Even as images of widespread protests in Hong Kong — there were about 2 million protesters on Monday last week, according to most US television channels — against the territory’s controversial extradition law proposal were flashed across to viewers, Americans glued to their TV sets were, ostensibly, missing another important development taking place on their own soil: Chinese officials in the US went into a tizzy to urge US Department of State officials and politicians not to allow “visits” to the US by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) this month.
Chinese officials, who have over the years built up in the US a support base of people of Chinese origin, and use them to drum up support for China’s cause, worked overtime after getting instructions to stop the US government from allowing Tsai to come to the US.
If one reads the fine nuances that get submerged in the diplomatese, Tsai this time will not be just making a “stopover,” which, usually, involves a few hours or a day’s layover before taking the first available flight out of the US.
Tsai will spend a total of four nights, which, in contrast to previous maximum stopovers of a day at a time, would acquire the character of a visit — a red flag for Beijing, which has described this as “unacceptable.”
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Geng Shuang (耿爽) called on the US to “cautiously and appropriately handle Taiwan-related issues … to avoid harming Sino-US relations, and peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.”
Beijing has already lodged a strong demarche with Washington against allowing Tsai’s visits.
Tsai will visit Caribbean island nations that maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, and she is to spend two nights in the US each way on her way to and from St Vincent and the Grenadines, St Lucia, St Kitts and Nevis, and Haiti on a trip that begins on Thursday. She is expected to break up her journey in New York City and Denver.
Tsai’s stopovers will be, according to US sources, the longest by an officiating president of Taiwan, a fact that has particularly irked Beijing.
Although the US is not particularly bothered by the usual protests from China whenever a high-ranking dignitary sets foot on US soil, the State Department recited the usual “there’s-no-change-in-one-China-policy” assurance to China.
Experts see this assurance as an attempt to sugarcoat what is for China a bitter pill.
While reciting its “one China” policy assurance, Washington continues to maintain close cooperation with Taiwan and provides it with assistance.
The State Department explains that it gives permission to Taiwanese dignitaries for a stopover to enable them to transit the US, aimed at ensuring their safety, comfort, convenience and dignity.
In the past few years, even before US President Donald Trump took office, the mood in the US was increasingly turning against China’s growing aggressive stand on a host of issues — ranging from unfair trade practices through the militarization of the South China Sea to issues such as Xinjiang’s Uighur population, the repression in Tibet, the tightening grip on Hong Kong and threats against Taiwan.
Taiwan’s success as a vibrant democracy, along with its thriving market economy, are thorns in China’s flesh; Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who has vowed to bring Taiwan to the “motherland’s fold,” needs to impress his rivals vying for the country’s leadership that he can get Taiwan back.
In trying to force Taiwan to return to its fold, Chinese diplomacy is working toward isolating Taiwan on the international diplomatic circuit by offering economic sops to countries that maintain diplomatic ties with Taipei, and pressuring them to sever ties with it.
At present, there are only 17 small nations in Central America and the Pacific maintaining ties with Taiwan.
However, by doing so, China is losing out on goodwill because many of the world’s established democracies, while not maintaining official ties with Taiwan, recognize the island republic’s commitment to democratic ideals with all the concomitant characteristics of an independent judiciary, a strong and free press, and a democratically elected legislature, unlike China’s rubber-stamp parliament, the National People’s Congress.
Fearing that people would question the Chinese Communist Party’s authority, China has imposed strict censorship measures that prevent the ordinary Chinese from getting information about the working of democracies in neighboring countries; indeed, Chinese censorship does not allow any room for ordinary Chinese to question why they cannot live like people in neighboring countries and why their lives are so stringently controlled by the all-pervasive party.
US politicians across the aisle, nongovernmental organizations, human rights organizations and even some businesspeople are increasingly losing their patience with China’s repressive characteristics, particularly after recent massive protests in Hong Kong against the erosion of the territory’s civil liberties guaranteed under the UK-China treaty.
Hong Kong’s 2 million demonstrators, out of a total population of 7 million, sent a clear message to the world: China, which has been pushing for the extradition bill through Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), cannot be trusted to respect the letter and spirit of agreements it enters into.
Hong Kong’s image as Asia’s financial hub has been dented as it sinks into unprecedented political chaos after three weeks of record-breaking demonstrations against the hugely unpopular extradition bill.
There are fears being expressed in many Western countries that the demonstrators in Hong Kong could possibly meet the fate of the demonstrators massacred in Tiananmen Square in 1989.
Thus, Tsai’s visits to the US take place at a time when public sympathy toward China has significantly dwindled following the negative publicity that the Hong Kong demonstrations have generated for China whose “one country, two systems” formula for Taiwan’s unification rings hollow.
While the US will continue to harp on its “one China” policy assurance — a lip service, as many see it — in response to China’s protest against Tsai’s visits, it will, at the same time, not stop visits by Taiwanese leaders on their way to reinforce ties with its partners and prevent China from weaning away the few friends that maintain relations with Taipei.
Manik Mehta is a New York-based journalist with extensive writing experience on foreign affairs, diplomacy, global economics and international trade.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past