After 86 days of turmoil, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential primary finally ended, with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) winning the nomination. Now it is time for Taiwanese who love their homeland to think positively and optimistically.
The primary was a blessing and a hard-won experience for Taiwan. Both candidates, the nation and the DPP are all winners, because it deepened and advanced Taiwan’s democracy, bared the tension inherent to democracy and further consolidated it in the minds of the public. The primary was a victory for Taiwan.
Undeniably, obvious flaws could be found during the process. For instance, the promulgated rules were constantly changed and delayed, raising questions about fairness.
Fortunately, the process was concluded peacefully, and these 86 days, characterized by cooperation and competition, unwittingly boosted party morale. Overall public support for the DPP has improved slowly, but steadily from the rock bottom of 24.7 percent. Competition gives rise to progress, and the primary was a victory for the DPP.
For Tsai, being a presidential candidate nominated in a party primary bestows a different legitimacy and authority than if she had been directly nominated. The primary certainly gives Tsai an edge and strengthens her credibility and competitiveness in the election in January next year.
The reason for the primary was the concern that the administration’s policies might be too accommodating to China and are neglecting national security. Tsai also made adjustments during the primary period and turned herself into a “smart Taiwanese cookie” opposing Chinese annexation. She also put her ear to the ground in frequent visits to grassroots supporters, which helped her support ratings.
In polls, she defeated two potential competitors — Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and independent Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — by 11 percent and 13 percent respectively. Voters’ confidence in her is firmly established, so the primary was a victory for Tsai, too.
Former premier William Lai (賴清德) challenged Tsai because he saw the DPP’s crisis in last year’s local elections and wanted to take charge, hoping that he could turn the tide. Essentially, Lai’s challenge was not an attempted power grab, but an attempt to safeguard Taiwan’s freedom and democracy. That is why he proposed “five noes” — no mobilization, flags, vehicles, headquarters or campaign posters — and fair play. He also said that he would rather lose than harm Tsai. Lai did indeed fulfill his promises.
The DPP Central Executive Committee on May 29 insisted on changing the primary rules by including 50 percent cellphone interviews and comparing popular support for Tsai and Lai when pitched against two potential non-DPP competitors. Had Lai not conceded, the primary could have gone on forever and sent the DPP down a dark hole.
Everyone, including Lai, knows that conceding would lead to his losing the primary, but to prevent the party from disintegrating and making the primary possible, Lai gave in and showed his statesmanship and magnanimous attitude, which will be forever praised. The primary, then, was also a victory for Lai, who was the biggest winner of all.
Let bygones be bygones. It is time to seriously consider Tsai’s suggestion that “one plus one is greater than two.” Tsai and Lai can be trusted to make the best decision for the DPP and the nation.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new