Hundreds of thousands of Hong Kongers have joined a series of protests against proposed amendments to the territory’s Fugitive Offenders Ordinance, which would enable Hong Kong to extradite people to China.
China was abducting Hong Kong residents and foreign nationals from various places long before the extradition bill was proposed.
In 2015, Causeway Bay Books manager Lam Wing-kei (林榮基) disappeared. Bookshop shareholder and Swedish citizen Gui Minhai (桂民海) disappeared in Thailand and another shareholder, British national Paul Lee (李波), disappeared in Hong Kong. They all wound up incarcerated in China.
In 2017, Taiwanese human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲) was arrested after crossing the border from Macau to Zhuhai in Guangdong Province.
Also in 2017, Chinese capitalist Xiao Jianhua (肖建華), who has Canadian citizenship and Hong Kong residency, was taken to China from the Hong Kong Four Seasons Hotel.
In 2002, Chinese democracy movement pioneer and US green card holder Wang Bingzhang (王炳章) was abducted in Vietnam and taken to China.
As Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland has said, China’s arbitrary detentions of foreign nationals on the pretext that they have broken its national security laws, while actually using them as hostages, has become a problem that every country must face.
Beijing has been reaching into Hong Kong and taking away its judicial independence, personal freedoms and freedom of expression. If this compels foreign investors and transnational financial institutions to pull out of Hong Kong, its status as a trade and financial hub would be lost forever.
Hong Kongers have taken to the streets because they see the extradition bill crisis as their last chance to avoid this fate.
In China’s eyes, Hong Kong has been supplanted by Shanghai, overtaken by Shenzhen and submerged by the Greater Bay Area, turning it into a mere locality.
China and the US are locked in a conflict between democracy and human rights on one side and totalitarian dictatorship on the other. Hong Kong’s extradition bill is just a way of legalizing Chinese abductions.
Beijing is emulating the long-arm jurisdiction of Western nations by seizing people and holding them hostage, while the US threatens to retaliate with a draft Hong Kong human rights and democracy bill, which would amend the terms of the 1992 US-Hong Kong Policy Act.
It remains to be seen whether this will hit China where it hurts.
China’s dictatorship is deeply rooted in its traditional culture. The despotic regime has existed since the Zhou Dynasty, while the Confucian hierarchical relations between ruler and officials, father and son, and so on, form a top-down concept of the state with strictly controlled relations of rank and class.
This system respects absolute dominance, with no concept of human rights, freedom or democracy.
If China were still weak and isolationist, this would not threaten the rest of the world. However, US policies since the 1970s have enabled China to grow into an expansionist and domineering troublemaker.
Taiwanese might laugh at Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) slogan of “being mindful of the mainland, developing a global perspective and conquering the universe,” but if the US and other Western democracies fail to recognize the dark side of Chinese culture and take precautions, China’s rise could be a disaster for humankind.
Lau Yi-te is chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US