President’s true nature
The jaw-dropping participation of former premier William Lai (賴清德) in the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential primary provoked a heated debate.
One of his glorified excuses was that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) approval rating flatlined after last year’s local elections. He claimed that because there was only an outside chance of her winning next year’s presidential election, he must step forward to take the responsibility to run.
Ostensibly, looking at poll data, it seems that Tsai did not do her job well. However, can polls represent the whole story? Should people not look under the hood before blaming her for her low popularity?
As a responsible voter, it matters more to observe politicians’ actions over a long period than to only listen to them during campaigns. Tsai might be not an eloquent speaker, but she is definitely a pragmatist.
Her administration focused on reforms. She pulled off the government employees’ pension reform, which was a head-scratcher for previous presidents, amended the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), raised the minimum wage and codified marriage equality. She also developed green energy to achieve the goal of a nuclear-free homeland policy.
More importantly, she made Taiwan’s consensus clear to the world when China’s dictator tried to unify Taiwan with a policy of “one country, two systems.”
Almost all the issues she tackled were controversial, making it difficult to please everyone, but she did not choose the easy way out by leaving the problems for a second term.
During the reform process, many rightists felt offended, but some extreme leftists said that her efforts were not aggressive enough. She was often caught between two fires, but she always kept trying to find the best solution to let the two sides meet in the middle.
After Tsai took office, she led Taiwan away from China’s clout. The nation is on the right track, although some of us might lose some benefits for now.
With her dedicated administration, the Public Service Pension Fund will not go bankrupt in 30 years, the goal of a nuclear-free homeland is reachable, the minimum wage has been raised incrementally and Taiwan has become an impressive nation that embraces the values of humanity and equality in Asia by legalizing same-sex marriage.
Tsai has proven that making wise calls can lead Taiwan to prosperity without inclining toward China too much.
Of course, there are still many amendments that need to be done because it is never easy to perfect reforms all at once, but Taiwanese should have faith in Tsai. She is not only a reformer with determination, but also a real statesperson who will bring Taiwan to the world.
The bravery of doing the right thing with long-term vision means she is a statesperson instead of a politician.
Hung Hsiang-fei
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US