Chiang’s statues
In response to an article by Chen Yu-fu and William Hetherington, my opinion regarding Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) statues, scattered all across Taiwan, is similar to that of New Power Party Legislator Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明) (“Legislator urges action on Chiang Kai-shek statues,” June 4, page 3).
I believe that Chiang’s statues should all be removed or relocated. Taiwan is now a democratic country. Statues celebrating an oppressive authoritarian dictator no longer reflect the country’s values.
Chiang’s ruthless rule and complete control were maintained by stepping on the corpses of Taiwanese citizens. Thousands of innocent people perished under the rule of dictator Chiang. The horrid 228 Massacre in 1947, commenced under his command, killed more than 28,000 Taiwanese.
In his authority, he made free speech a crime. Those who dared to speak up and criticize or oppose the government during that period went missing. It has been estimated that up to 3,000 Taiwanese who opposed him or spoke ill of him were executed.
Today, Taiwan is a progressive democratic country that values the lives of its citizens. It is a country that stands for freedom of speech and basic human rights. Chiang no longer has his authoritarian grip on Taiwan.
Hence, his statues, which symbolize a time of his cruelty and dictatorship, should be removed.
Taiwan has moved on since and we no longer have to live in his shadow.
Irene Tang
Taipei
Bicycle route
While news of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications’ plan to splurge billions upgrading the nation’s circuitous bicycle route sounds like a wonderful idea, there is a fundamental problem (“MOTC to upgrade round-the-nation cycling route,” June 3, page 1).
Regardless of how well the route is signposted, the fact remains that sections of it will still involve riding on many kilometers of monotonous highway.
If you have ever pedaled on Highway No. 9 south of Hualien, or along Highway No. 1 in Pingtung — both incorporated in the route — I seriously doubt you would chose to repeat the feat. As one of your contributors put it back in Nov. 8. 2013: “By the time we reached Taichung, we were growing tired of chewing up kilometer after kilometer of flat highway between interchangeable urban centers.”
I fail to see how the Tourism Bureau can be happy with that kind of reporting.
Hopefully the ministry will focus more on the 25 branch lines, especially ones that weave through some of Taiwan’s bucolic landscape, and consider routes such as Highway No. 7.
This route is simply a provincial road with little traffic and winds through spectacular scenery. Passing over the central mountains, it links Taoyuan with Yilan, and branches south to Lishan. From there there’s the thrill of cycling down Taroko Gorge on Highway No. 8, which should be on the bucket list of every cycle tourist.
As an avid cyclist who has cycled in over 40 countries and written various magazine articles about cycle touring, it saddens me that so many fellow riders blindly follow this round-Taiwan route.
I have explored lots of Taiwan in the 20 years I’ve lived here and know the island has so much to attract cyclists, and also know that having new road markings won’t give any cycle tourist a buzz.
Graham Finch
Taoyuan
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers