When the world commemorated the 30th anniversary of the Chinese government’s brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, public discussion of the events leading to the massacre remains off-limits in China.
Amnesia is incredibly dangerous, because it undermines the public’s moral and intellectual integrity, and lays the foundation for future violent persecutions.
Imposing collective amnesia is a signature feature of the state terror, and China is no exception. Accurate accounts of the Tiananmen Massacre are banned in the public domain.
Every time this year, Chinese authorities arrested political dissidents seeking to honor the massacre victims, and shut down their Sina Weibo accounts.
Beijing reinforces political quiescence and cynicism by denying people freedom of expression and assembly, and by propagating that China’s one-party rule and socialist economy are superior to multi-party democracy and free markets.
Unfortunately, a substantial portion of the Chinese population has accepted the post-Tiananmen bargain — “money yes, politics no,” expressing political loyalty in exchange for economic prosperity.
One long-term legacy of the Tiananmen tragedy is that authoritarianism has emerged as an influential geopolitical force in the early 21st century, with China and Russia championing anti-liberalism as an alternative to a teetering liberal order.
In contrast, the rest of the world strives to keep alive the Tiananmen memory in symbolic and substantive ways. Commemorating the June 4th anniversary has now become part of a global democratization project.
In Taipei, a gigantic inflatable model of the powerful “tank man” has been exhibited outside the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall since late last month. This icon of courageous resistance to military dictatorship transcends boundaries and inspires oppressed peoples worldwide.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) met with a delegation of former Tiananmen student leaders in the Presidential Office Building, and vowed to defend the nation’s fully fledged democracy against Beijing.
This high-profile gesture not only generated goodwill among exiled activists striving to democratize China, but also signified a new initiative to support democracy and human rights advocates in neighboring countries.
Undoubtedly, Hong Kong’s massive candlelight vigil attracted worldwide media coverage. More than 180,000 people gathered in Victoria Park to remember the victims and their families.
The huge turnout at the annual vigil was of great significance at many levels.
First, the event symbolized a smooth generational transition in the territory’s prodemocracy movement. The whole ceremony was presided over young activists, who were mostly born after 1997.
Since the months-long peaceful protests in late 2014, known as the “Umbrella movement,” the local pro-democracy struggle has become a youthful campaign.
Despite the imprisonment of several prominent leaders of the movement, many young activists have asserted themselves and stepped up to play a leadership role in this politically hostile environment.
Second, China’s democratic trajectory was thought to be better understood through the voices of Tiananmen survivors and human rights advocates.
This year’s annual vigil adopted the method of storytelling to emphasize unique personal experience. Accounts given by the Tiananmen mothers, and by Hong Kong student leaders and journalists who witnessed the massacre 30 years ago brought tears, sorrow and grief to everyone.
As Hong Kongers are now fighting for their rights and acting out their convictions in the public square, they learn from these historical actors a strong, if new, faith in democratic struggle.
Third, the vigil attracted numerous Mainland Chinese students and professionals residing in Hong Kong and visitors from across the border. The awakening experience might cause confusion and disorientation, but it would prompt them to reject amnesia about the past.
Once the Chinese authoritarian state cannot control their political thought, the ingrained ideologies of times past become obsolete.
Being a new theater of democratic laboratory for Mainlanders, Hong Kong provides a new social space to define and contest what democracy truly means to Chinese of all stripes.
Embracing universal values and norms, cultural diversity, and democratic governance is a learning process to foster an inclusive setting for people with vastly different opinions.
Whenever people gather to commemorate the Tiananmen anniversary in Taiwan, Hong Kong and China, they are actually exploring new modes of engagement to advance the unfinished project of democratization.
After all, justice, freedom and equality are not the result of abstract and wishful thinking.
Taiwan’s remarkable journey toward democracy and the ongoing political struggle among Hong Kongers have clearly demonstrated that democratic governance is deeply embedded in a genuine sense of localism and closely tied to everyday livelihood.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers