In most of the EU, this week’s European Parliament election is a low-energy affair. Not in Poland, where tomorrow’s vote could determine the nation’s direction — and eastern Europe’s — for years to come.
The closely fought contest pits the ruling Law and Justice Party, the nationalist force known by its Polish abbreviation PiS, against five major anti-authoritarian parties and a number of smaller groups called the European Coalition.
“It’s a black-and-white situation,” said Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, No. 3 on the Coalition’s list of candidates in Warsaw. “If the Coalition wins, Poland still has a chance to be a democratic country. If PiS wins, Poland will drift toward an eastern model of government. We can either take the Europe express or the Trans-Siberian railroad.”
Illustration: Lance Liu
This might sound like the kind of exaggeration one is likely to hear from a politician in the heat of a campaign’s final days. However, the example of Hungary weighs heavily on the Polish moderate right, center-left and Greens, three factions that are normally disinclined to cooperate with each other, but have joined forces for this month’s contest.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban won his third consecutive election last year against a divided opposition, tightening his stranglehold on the courts, media and civic organizations.
Even if Orban’s opponents manage to join forces by the next election in 2022, they might be too marginalized after 11 years of his propaganda and expanding enforcement machinery to be able to oust him.
In Poland, PiS only came to power in 2015 and it has tried to build up control in one legislative period. Under the nationalist leadership of Jaroslaw Kaczynski, it put the judiciary under political control, turned public media into a propaganda machine PiS opponents says is reminiscent of Poland’s communist past, enlisted the Polish Catholic Church to back its identity politics and boosted social benefits to appeal to poorer rural voters.
This race to Orbanize Poland has worked well enough that PiS can withstand scandals that would have brought down many a government in Europe. One involves the alleged entanglement of the supposedly ascetic Kaczynski in a real-estate project funded by a loan from a bank nationalized by the PiS government.
Another followed the revelation of lucrative land speculation involving Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki (before he was appointed to the post) and the Catholic Church.
Both were uncovered by reporting in the daily Gazeta Wyborcza; Kaczynski and Morawiecki have denied wrongdoing.
Separately, a crowdfunded documentary that exposed a coverup of pedophile clergy by the church has implicated the one-time chaplain to Poland’s first post-communist leader, Lech Walesa, and has even cast a shadow over the revered late Polish pope John Paul II.
The film hit YouTube days after Kaczynski told a crowd of PiS supporter: “He who raises his hand against the church and wants to destroy it, raises his hand against Poland.”
After church figures expressed contrition, PiS had to look for a damage-control strategy, calling for harsher penalties for pedophiles.
However, the scandals have failed to dent the ruling party’s standing in the polls; its support has been fluctuating between 35 and 40 percent in public opinion polls since February.
“Even with such a bombshell as the church film, we probably see two trends canceling each other out — the public indignation and Kaczynski’s effective use of the idea that the church is under attack,” said sociologist Jacek Kucharczyk, president of the Warsaw think tank Institute of Public Affairs.
Kucharczyk said that churches, especially in small towns and rural areas, are an important under-the-radar propaganda channel for PiS.
Still, the scandals have put PiS on the defensive and created an opening for the European Coalition, whose leaders have made an uncharacteristic effort to stick together and stay on message.
Gasiuk-Pihowicz, the Coalition EU Parliament candidate in Warsaw, illustrates the conflicting pressures. She was a top national legislator for the liberal Novoczesna (Modern) Party, but when its leaders leaned against joining opposition alliances last year, she quit and started cooperating with the main opposition force, Civic Platform, the governing party before the PiS victory.
“I like to think my action pushed the Modern Party to realize it belonged in the Coalition,” Gasiuk-Pihowicz said.
Another center-left politician, Wlodzimierz Cimoszevicz, also claimed credit for inspiring cooperation.
Retired until recently after a career that included most of the top posts in Poland — foreign minister, justice minister, prime minister, parliamentary speaker — Cimoszevicz has stepped forward to run for a seat in the EU’s weak legislature. Now the Coalition’s No. 1 candidate in Warsaw, he described the stakes in an interview last week:
If the pro-European forces win in the European election, it would convince them — and the Polish public — that it is possible to defeat PiS in the parliamentary elections this fall.
A broad coalition is needed for both elections, which is not really a tradition in Polish politics.
The Polish center-left does not bring many votes to the European Coalition; forces from that part of the political spectrum failed to get into parliament in 2015, ultimately helping PiS win its majority.
However, Cimoszevicz remembers working to put together a broad leftist coalition in 1991, and he participated in resolving many European crises since putting his signature on Poland’s EU accession treaty.
“I talked some leaders into sitting down and discussing the alliance,” he said. “But once I did this, I had to run, too.”
Talking to European Coalition candidates, one gets the sense that the only thing that unites them is the desire to reverse the PiS takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal, the prosecutor’s offices and the process of judicial appointments.
There also is consensus on the public media; Cimoszevicz proposes abolishing them in the current form and then rebuilding them from scratch.
“I pay a tax for public TV and radio, but I haven’t turned them on in four years,” he said. “In effect, I’m paying for propaganda against myself.”
PiS portrays the opposition as a giant undo button with no positive agenda. That is not strictly accurate. The EU, thanks in large part to European Council President Donald Tusk, who served as Polish prime minister before the PiS victory, has taken a harsh stance on the nationalists’ justice reforms.
Poland stands to lose 23 percent of its EU funding, or about 19.2 billion euros (US$21.4 billion), between 2021 and 2027. The PiS government has loudly protested this, but European Coalition leaders are not far from the truth when they say they are the only force that can get the money back and use it, for example, to fix Poland’s dysfunctional healthcare system.
The Coalition uses the potential loss of EU funds to counter the PiS government’s social-benefit expansion. It is widely known and appreciated in Poland that EU funds have built roads and helped keep Polish farmers competitive.
Another item on the Coalition’s agenda is getting back Poland’s seat at the European decisionmaking table and rebuilding its cooperation with France and Germany, a format PiS unceremoniously dropped as it stressed Polish national pride over alliances with key EU nations. However, this is a tough sell to nationalist voters, who have no affection for the Germans in particular.
On the issue of Poland’s global importance, the watchers of PiS-controlled public TV and the Coalition’s more discerning big-city audience live in separate universes.
In any case, the opposition does have a common agenda beyond undoing the PiS power grab, and that agenda involves European issues of direct interest to Poles. This makes the European election such a tight race with a relatively high predicted turnout, even as high as 50 percent, compared with less than 24 percent in 2014.
While PiS and the European Coalition are about even in the polls, there is a good chance that anti-nationalist forces will prevail this week.
Wiosna (Spring), the leftist-liberal party of the openly gay former mayor of Slupsk, Robert Biedron, is expected to get up to 10 percent of the vote. Together, the European Coalition and Wiosna are likely to get more of Poland’s 51 European Parliament seats than PiS and smaller parties to its right.
Though Biedron, a charismatic figure vying for the leftist anti-establishment vote, has resisted joining forces with the centrists, Coalition leaders hope the election result would drive him toward them.
“He may not want to go alone and be responsible for letting PiS rule for another term,” Cimoszevicz said.
If the anti-nationalist forces can claim victory, they will have momentum going into the campaign for the national parliamentary election this fall, but if they lose — for example, because of a late surge by the extreme-right Confederation, a force that attacks PiS from the right with often anti-Semitic slogans — the disparate forces’ unity could shatter and the Orban scenario for Poland would become more likely.
While hope is still alive, European Coalition leaders say Poland should not be susceptible to Orban-style authoritarianism. Kaczynski has moved too fast and too aggressively, which makes the system he has been building in Poland easier to dismantle than Orban’s, former digitization minister Andrzej Halicki said.
Besides, Poles have a rich history of resisting authoritarianism.
“In communist times, Hungary was more liberal, closer to Vienna,” said Halicki, who was a radical student activist in the final years of communism, traveling illegally to neighboring countries to help local dissidents bring down their pro-Soviet regimes. “We’re different in that we had a whole underground society. Our soul and our history make propaganda counterproductive.”
If Halicki is right, Poland should not succumb entirely to nationalist illiberalism, even after another four years of PiS rule, especially if the governing party loses EU funding and starts surrendering economic momentum.
However, it makes sense for the Polish opposition to fight every battle as if it were the last — and, above all, to stick together.
If it could win this week and later this year, Europe’s recently deepened east-west divide may start healing. With nationalists also losing ground in Slovakia, Orban can hardly remain the region’s leading voice if Poland, too, defects from his way of thinking.
Leonid Bershidsky is Bloomberg Opinion’s Europe columnist. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion Web site Slon.ru. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US