A same-sex union special act drafted by HTC chairwoman Cher Wang’s (王雪紅) Faith, Hope and Love Foundation and proposed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Tai-hua (林岱樺) proceeded to a second legislative reading on May 3. Alongside the Executive Yuan’s “enforcement act of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748” and a “same-sex family members special act” sponsored by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆), the three draft bills were on Thursday sent to cross-caucus talks presided over by Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全).
Laws formulated to cover family members and relatives, marriages or any horizontal union between two people should never disregard a family’s vertical relationships. There are already many same-sex families in Taiwan whose children were born after an anonymous sperm donation and artificial insemination. These children are lineal descendants of one of the parents in a legal parent-child relationship.
What requires particular consideration from lawmakers is how to give the other spouse in the same-sex marriage — who is not the biological parent, but who is willing to raise the child with their partner — the legal right to rear, protect and educate the child with the partner in the best interests of the child, rather than the adults.
This seems to be the core concern for people who trumpet the protection of family values and advocate the concept of family responsibilities. Parents determined to give birth to children and raise them together should also be allowed to jointly exercise their rights and fulfill their responsibilities. The law should recognize the parent-child relationship between the non-biological parent and their partner’s child.
This is why the Cabinet’s draft, written by the Ministry of Justice, allows a spouse in a same-sex marriage to adopt the other spouse’s biological children.
The court, after ensuring that the spouses want to jointly raise the child and that the relationship is in the child’s best interests, approves the adoption, which grants parent-child rights, but also the obligation to care for the child — in the same way as for heterosexual families. Stable relationships not easily renounced are in the best interest of adopted children.
Lin’s and Lai’s bills only allow a spouse in a same-sex marriage who is the biological parent to grant the other spouse — who is not a blood relation of the child — partial guardianship. Their idea is that guardianship would allow the spouse of the biological parent to contribute to the child’s care and protection. The same mechanism exists in the Civil Code (民法) and most people in a same-sex relationship have already authorized their partner to be the guardian of their children.
In principle, the law allows biological parents to authorize any trusted person to perform the function of a guardian, regardless of their relationship to the child. Even a nanny can be the authorized guardian of a child.
From a legal perspective, should two parents who bring up a child together be considered nannies or parents? The Lin and Lai versions prefer creating a guardianship that can be terminated, leaving children who are used to having two people caring for them with only one.
What does that mean for the family stability that Lin and Lai advocate for or their position that having two parents is better than one? The adoption approach gives the child greater security. An adoption can only be broken by a court, not the will of the parents.
If a same-sex couple breaks up, the one exercising guardianship over the child can renounce the relationship and become free of further responsibility. If the guardian had greater financial means, the breakup could result in a sudden decline in the child’s care.
Opponents of same-sex marriage use the justification that they protect “the happiness of the next generation,” but in refusing to give equal rights to same-sex families, the best interests of the children are ignored.
Closer scrutiny of the posturing of lawmakers and lobbyists reveals their focus on the selfish interests of adults: the nature of kinship, whether the biological or the adoptive parent is the child’s true family after a breakup.
From the beginning, opponents of same-sex marriage never really considered the issue from the perspective of protecting the well-being of children. The legislators, before casting their votes, should think twice about which version conforms to the best interests of the children.
Kuan Hsiao-wei is an associate professor of law at National Taipei University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused