On April 15, Hon Hai Group chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) said Taiwan should stop purchasing arms from the US because Washington has been selling old equipment to the nation for many years.
His comment drew attention because it shows that he draws conclusions from generalizations and ignores the long-term friendship between the two nations’ armed forces.
Saying that all arms sold to Taiwan by the US are secondhand is simply untrue. Many of the arms to be purchased or that have been received by the nation’s armed forces are new systems and even newly manufactured, including the latest F-16V jets, MIM-104F Patriot surface-to-air missiles, AIM-120 medium-range air-to-air missiles and AGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missiles purchased by the air force.
The army’s Boeing AH-64E Apache helicopters, AGM-114 Hellfire missiles and FIM-92 Stinger surface-to-air missiles, as well as the navy’s RIM-66A Standard missiles and MK48 torpedoes, are also new.
The armed forces do have some secondhand equipment, such as M60A3 tanks, which have served in the army for a long time.
However, experts with knowledge about the basic nature of defensive equipment will be familiar with the concept that strong combat capabilities can be maintained before second-hand gear reaches the end of its operational service life.
Reconstructing and upgrading operating systems also helps retain combat capabilities.
The Bell AH-1W Super Cobra attack helicopters and the OH-58D Kiowa reconnaissance helicopters of the Army Aviation and Special Forces Command are good examples. Many years of deployment experience show that helicopters are capable of conducting anti-landing and anti-airborne operations. Their impressive performance at the annual Han Kuang military exercises further proves that secondhand equipment can still perform.
As the US-Taiwan arm sales have been regular, despite numerous transitions of political power in Taiwan and changes to national defense policy, the US can always be relied on as the greatest safeguard of the nation’s security.
Arms sales not only make up for the insufficiency in combat capabilities and technological power, but also carry vital political implications. Discrediting arms sales out of hand could destroy the long-term mutual political trust between Taiwan and the US, and even weaken the combat capabilities of the armed forces.
Seen in this light, sustaining Taiwan-US relations should not only be founded upon mutual political trust, but also on interactions of national defense, which have been part of a tacit agreement between the two sides for years.
Anyone who wants to run for president needs to have a practical understanding of the relationship. After all, Taiwan is of great importance to the US, Japan and regional security in the Asia-Pacific.
The nation cannot be too careful about its defense, as shunning it could severely affect regional stability.
Ray Song is a graduate from the Institute of Strategic and International Affairs at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS