As a child growing up in Lagos, Nigeria, in the late 1990s, I remember women roaming through my community and chanting in Yoruba: “Onigo de o! Anra bata rubber ati ayo t’on jo.”
This translates as “The bottle peddler is here! We buy rubber sandals and leaky [aluminum] pots.”
Some families would separate their waste, because they could give some of it to these women for cash.
There are far fewer of these peddlers nowadays, perhaps because bottling companies are no longer recycling the bottles that the women gather, but a large-scale effort along these lines to monetize waste in Lagos, if properly coordinated and funded, could potentially have a huge effect on the city’s garbage problem.
What works in Lagos could hold lessons for many other cities — and not only in the developing world.
In Lagos, action is urgently needed. The city has a population of about 22 million and, as the World Bank has highlighted, is heavily polluted.
Especially in poorer areas, residents who cannot afford to pay for waste collection come out in the dead of night to dump their garbage on the streets or in the water. As a result, the city’s slums are littered with paper, household waste and plastics.
By outsourcing most of the actual waste collection and management to about 375 private companies, the Lagos Waste Management Authority, an arm of the Lagos State Government, has helped to reduce waste significantly.
However, much more can, and must, be done. Unless people are given incentives to monetize their garbage and minimize the amount that reaches landfills, the pollution problem will continue to fester.
Three options in particular look promising:
For starters, Lagos could introduce a green-exchange program such as the one established in Curitiba, Brazil. There, residents bring their waste to designated local centers in exchange for bus tickets or food.
Many workers in Lagos are already switching from cars to state-run commuter buses because they cannot afford the cost of fuel. If poorer people in particular could receive bus tickets for their waste, life would be easier for everyone.
There would be less garbage on the streets, roads would be less clogged and people would not need to wait for waste trucks to get rid of their rubbish.
In addition, households would be more likely to separate waste if the city gave food stamps or fruit to those that recycled a certain amount of metal, clean plastic or oil waste, for example.
Second, Lagos could reduce its plastic waste by working more closely with bottling companies and other manufacturers.
This could involve public-private partnerships that require each company to operate a recycling center where consumers can bring used plastics. Citizens will feel motivated to recycle their plastic waste at centers bearing recognizable brand names, especially if a reward program is involved.
No bottling companies currently have recycle-for-reward programs in the Makoko community of Lagos, where I grew up.
Introducing such schemes would certainly help to cut the amount of plastic waste that is generated or discarded.
Lastly, campaigns to raise environmental awareness would encourage better waste management. By showcasing ordinary citizens being mindful of waste and their environment in everyday life, such efforts could inspire others to do the same.
My current work in Berea, Kentucky, at the Greenie Project, a non-profit student initiative that I started, shows how environmental awareness can spread.
Our film The Carlbergs chronicles a local family that hosts huge contra-dance events in their home in a sustainable way — by using silverware and ceramic plates instead of disposable plates and cutlery, and by recycling.
The film has inspired other groups and small businesses in the community, such as Berea Coffee and Tea, to be more sustainable.
Similarly, creative and locally relevant approaches would work well almost anywhere.
That includes Lagos, where the waste problem hits the poor particularly hard. To address it, we should create the right incentives, as the bottle peddlers in my part of the city did two decades ago.
Monetizing waste will encourage poorer communities to participate, and awareness campaigns can help to show just how easy it is to be green. The result will be a cleaner, more livable city that serves as an example for others to follow.
Stephen Nwaloziri, founder of the Greenie Project, is a program associate at the Berea College Forestry Outreach Center.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers