As a child growing up in Lagos, Nigeria, in the late 1990s, I remember women roaming through my community and chanting in Yoruba: “Onigo de o! Anra bata rubber ati ayo t’on jo.”
This translates as “The bottle peddler is here! We buy rubber sandals and leaky [aluminum] pots.”
Some families would separate their waste, because they could give some of it to these women for cash.
There are far fewer of these peddlers nowadays, perhaps because bottling companies are no longer recycling the bottles that the women gather, but a large-scale effort along these lines to monetize waste in Lagos, if properly coordinated and funded, could potentially have a huge effect on the city’s garbage problem.
What works in Lagos could hold lessons for many other cities — and not only in the developing world.
In Lagos, action is urgently needed. The city has a population of about 22 million and, as the World Bank has highlighted, is heavily polluted.
Especially in poorer areas, residents who cannot afford to pay for waste collection come out in the dead of night to dump their garbage on the streets or in the water. As a result, the city’s slums are littered with paper, household waste and plastics.
By outsourcing most of the actual waste collection and management to about 375 private companies, the Lagos Waste Management Authority, an arm of the Lagos State Government, has helped to reduce waste significantly.
However, much more can, and must, be done. Unless people are given incentives to monetize their garbage and minimize the amount that reaches landfills, the pollution problem will continue to fester.
Three options in particular look promising:
For starters, Lagos could introduce a green-exchange program such as the one established in Curitiba, Brazil. There, residents bring their waste to designated local centers in exchange for bus tickets or food.
Many workers in Lagos are already switching from cars to state-run commuter buses because they cannot afford the cost of fuel. If poorer people in particular could receive bus tickets for their waste, life would be easier for everyone.
There would be less garbage on the streets, roads would be less clogged and people would not need to wait for waste trucks to get rid of their rubbish.
In addition, households would be more likely to separate waste if the city gave food stamps or fruit to those that recycled a certain amount of metal, clean plastic or oil waste, for example.
Second, Lagos could reduce its plastic waste by working more closely with bottling companies and other manufacturers.
This could involve public-private partnerships that require each company to operate a recycling center where consumers can bring used plastics. Citizens will feel motivated to recycle their plastic waste at centers bearing recognizable brand names, especially if a reward program is involved.
No bottling companies currently have recycle-for-reward programs in the Makoko community of Lagos, where I grew up.
Introducing such schemes would certainly help to cut the amount of plastic waste that is generated or discarded.
Lastly, campaigns to raise environmental awareness would encourage better waste management. By showcasing ordinary citizens being mindful of waste and their environment in everyday life, such efforts could inspire others to do the same.
My current work in Berea, Kentucky, at the Greenie Project, a non-profit student initiative that I started, shows how environmental awareness can spread.
Our film The Carlbergs chronicles a local family that hosts huge contra-dance events in their home in a sustainable way — by using silverware and ceramic plates instead of disposable plates and cutlery, and by recycling.
The film has inspired other groups and small businesses in the community, such as Berea Coffee and Tea, to be more sustainable.
Similarly, creative and locally relevant approaches would work well almost anywhere.
That includes Lagos, where the waste problem hits the poor particularly hard. To address it, we should create the right incentives, as the bottle peddlers in my part of the city did two decades ago.
Monetizing waste will encourage poorer communities to participate, and awareness campaigns can help to show just how easy it is to be green. The result will be a cleaner, more livable city that serves as an example for others to follow.
Stephen Nwaloziri, founder of the Greenie Project, is a program associate at the Berea College Forestry Outreach Center.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US