When Norway’s largest political party decided that the Lofoten Islands in the north should not be opened up to oil exploration, a chill ran down the spine of the energy industry.
The decision by the opposition Labor Party on April 6 effectively ended any chance of drilling in the foreseeable future in an area of natural beauty that energy executives say is important to the future of the nation’s oil production.
It was a stark example of how priorities are changing in a country that has become one of the world’s richest on the back of oil.
Illustration: Mountain People
In particular, young people concerned about climate change are pushing for curbs on exploration, with many thinking the unthinkable: shutting down the oil industry altogether.
“Climate comes before cash,” Simon Sand, 16, said while demonstrating in front of the Norwegian Parliament during a climate protest inspired by Swedish teenage activist Gretha Thunberg.
While some might dismiss such protests as youthful rebellion, young people are undeniably driving change.
The decision by Labor, a traditional ally of the oil industry, to withdraw its support for Lofoten drilling was largely down to an internal campaign by its Workers’ Youth League (AUF).
“In this area, nature has to come first,” AUF leader Ina Libak, 29, said. “Because it’s so vulnerable, and because of fisheries and other kinds of industries.”
Indeed, the youth wings of seven out of the nine parliamentary parties in Norway call to either restrict or to completely phase out petroleum activities, according to a Reuters review of the programs of the organizations.
The youth wing of the ruling Conservative Party does not call for restrictions, but says it assumes “market and environment-based” downsizing of the industry.
Labor’s AUF wants to phase it out altogether by 2035.
Labor’s Lofoten move, which created a parliamentary majority against drilling, caused consternation in the oil and gas industry.
The area is estimated to contain 5 percent of total undiscovered resources on the Norwegian continental shelf and, furthermore, executives fear that the green lobby will soon move on to their next target, such as exploration in the Arctic.
Unions highlighted the economic risks of winding down the oil and gas sector — it employs 170,000 people and is the nation’s top moneymaker, projected by the government to produce 17 percent of GDP this year.
“Every responsible government, on the left or on the right, will need to balance the budget and they will have to rely on revenues from oil and gas,” said Frode Alfheim, leader of the top trade union for oil workers, Industri Energi.
“Those revenues are not possible to replace from other sources. Much of the welfare state comes from this industry,” he added.
Another sign of the hardening opposition toward fossil fuels and its impact on the energy industry is a lack of qualified recruits to replace a rapidly aging oil and gas workforce.
State oil giant Equinor, the top oil producer in Norway by far, expects about half of its 21,000 workforce to retire in the next decade.
The number of applications for the petroleum geosciences and engineering program at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, the nation’s leading program, fell to 33 last year from 420 in 2013 — although the 2014 to 2016 downturn in crude prices could also have been a big driver.
“It will be hard for us to provide enough for the oil companies in the next five years,” asid Egil Tjaaland, head of the university’s geoscience and petroleum department.
“Is this a response to the price of oil, or is it because of environmental reasons or political reasons? Young people today are looking for a secure job in and a job with a future — as it has always been,” he added.
However, those calling for Norway — western Europe’s largest oil producer and Europe’s second-largest gas supplier after Russia — to wean itself off oil and gas say that the future of jobs in the nations is a big factor motivating their campaign.
“The worst thing that we can do for people working in oil and gas industry is to close our eyes to what’s happening abroad and just say ‘good luck with this,’” Libak said. “When Europe stops using oil and gas and switches to other energy sources, and that is happening very fast, it would affect us... I’m really concerned that we will have high unemployment in 20 years if we don’t make that plan now.”
Ada Johanna Arnstad, leader of the youth wing of the agrarian Center Party, questioned how Norway could maintain high oil and gas output if countries met their carbon emissions reduction goals under the Paris Agreement.
“Right now, we [Norway] are planning for the Paris Agreement to come true. If it does, we will have huge issues in Norway if we continue to bet that oil and gas production will last for another 50 years,” the 26-year-old said.
Her family is well versed in the energy sector; her aunt, Marit Arnstad, is a former Norwegian oil minister and a former member of the board of Equinor.
The state oil giant last year changed its name from Statoil, partly to become more appealing to young people by emphasizing its renewable energy credentials.
“Let’s face it, the increased pressure and higher expectations [on oil companies] are not only coming from narrow political groupings and activists as they used to,” Equinor chief executive officer Eldar Saetre told oil executives in Houston, Texas, last month.
“But increasingly also from broader political circles, from more and more investors, and not least from young people,” he said.
From being a poor country characterized by emigration and living off fishing and agriculture, Norway became prosperous after oil was discovered at Ekofisk in the North Sea in 1969.
It now enjoys a GDP per capita about twice the level of Britain’s, according to IMF data from last year, and prudently pooled its revenue from oil into a sovereign wealth fund, now US$1 trillion in size and the world’s largest.
However, in a sign of the times, the giant wealth fund is itself now reducing its investments in oil and gas explorers to reduce its exposure to a risk of a permanent decline in oil prices.
For the Norwegian central bank, which manages the fund that owns about 1.4 percent of all equities worldwide, it is not a matter of whether the oil industry will disappear, but when.
“We have always known that oil and gas activities will be phased out sooner or later,” central bank Governor Oeystein Olsen told a meeting of Norway’s political and business elite in February.
“A stricter global climate policy may mean that this will occur sooner than foreseen earlier,” he said, although cautioned against forcing a downsizing of the industry.
Additional reporting by Alister Doyle and Lefteris Karagiannopoulos
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers