Armed with laptops, three dozen journalists and fact-checkers braced for battle before a live debate between Indonesian President Joko Widodo and his challenger, Prabowo Subianto.
With two giant screens displaying television network feeds in front of them, the keyboard warriors split into six groups, each responsible for fact-checking a segment of the debate.
For nearly three hours, their eyes barely left their screens as they attempted to verify candidates’ comments in real time: allegations about corruption, statistics on the country’s Muslim population, boasts and even personal anecdotes.
They and other fact-checkers are fighting a running battle against “fake news” and propaganda ahead of an election tomorrow in the world’s third-biggest democracy.
Election monitors are worried that the flow of misinformation stoking ethnic and religious divides could undermine electoral bodies and even raise social tensions.
The Cekfakta (“checkfacts” in Indonesian) initiative brings together non-profit, fact-checking organization Mafindo and 24 news organizations that normally compete fiercely with each other during election campaigns.
“There’s a watchdog now in operation,” Cekfakta cofounder Wahyu Dhyatmika, editor-in-chief of news Web site Tempo.co, told reporters. “As a candidate, you cannot throw claims into the air... We will fact-check them.”
Backed financially by Google News Lab, which also helps fund Mafindo, Cekfakta’s volunteers took over the US tech giant’s swanky Jakarta office for the debate on March 30.
Dhyatmika wanted to avoid a repeat of the 2014 election, also between Widodo and retired general Prabowo, when reporters were unprepared for the flood of false news reports that swept across social media.
The fact checkers’ adversaries, fake news peddlers, sit at screens too, pumping out misinformation disguised as fact that often exploits ethnic or religious divides.
“We’re in a war for content ... people are doing anything they want,” said one fake news creator, who has written stories depicting Indonesian officials as paid off by Beijing.
The person declined to be identified because such work is illegal.
Indonesia’s population of 269 million has a youthful median age of just over 30 years, according to the World Population Review.
With more than 100 million accounts, the country is Facebook’s third-largest market and a top-five market globally for its WhatsApp and Instagram platforms, as well as rival Twitter.
Fake news in Indonesia can rack up thousands of views in hours, despite laws against creating and spreading such content.
Mafindo’s head of fact-checking, Aribowo Sasmito, compares it to the drug trade.
“There are the factories, the dealers and the victims. Most of the people who end up arrested are victims... They read hoaxes and believed them to be true,” Sasmito said.
Since December last year, Mafindo has documented a surge in political fake news using ethnicity and religion to target both candidates.
The organization finds most worrisome the dozens of stories that paint electoral bodies as corrupt. This will be only Indonesia’s fourth democratic presidential election.
Sasmito considers it a good result if fact-checked posts can reach even a small fraction of the audience the originals did.
Mafindo’s work has made it some enemies. The group has received enough threats that it keeps its office address secret; Cefakta’s Web site was hacked after a previous debate.
A Reuters investigation last month found that the Prabowo and Widodo campaigns were funding sophisticated social media operations to spread propaganda and disinformation through fake accounts on behalf of the candidates.
Both campaigns said they did not use such teams.
One journalist said he was hired by Prabowo campaign advisers to write positive stories about Prabawo and negative ones on Widodo, to be posted on Facebook and WhatsApp.
He said he was not motivated by money, but believes the mainstream media is biased in favor of Widodo.
Fearing government retaliation, the man declined to be named, but he showed reporters communications that suggested he was he in contact with Prabowo advisers.
He said he wrote only “true” negative stories, and cited as an example a post that 2,000 Chinese workers on Sulawesi island were secretly part of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.
“We have evidence from government contacts and we can see they are soldiers from the way they look,” he said, declining to share such evidence.
Prabowo campaign spokesman Andre Rosiadi denied that any advisers had hired journalists to write “positive or negative content” and “especially not fake news.”
Asked about the Sulawesi allegation, a spokeswoman for the Chinese embassy in Indonesia replied to reporters in a text: “Fake news.”
However, such claims also make it onto the campaign trail.
A Prabowo campaign volunteer in West Java last week told reporters that millions of Chinese workers had been secretly relocated to Sulawesi.
“It’s not hoax, it’s fact,” volunteer Cecep Abdul Halim said.
Reuters found that the creator of the Sulawesi claim had also written stories in 2016 falsely depicting then-Jakarta governor Basuki Tjaha Purnama as a communist stooge of China.
Purnama, a Christian ethnic-Chinese Indonesian ally of Widodo, recently completed a two-year prison sentence for blasphemy against Islam based on a video doctored to make him seem he was insulting the Koran.
The man convicted of making the video, a former journalist, worked for Prabowo’s media team until he was sent to prison last month.
A campaign spokesman confirmed he had worked for the media team, but did not comment further.
Social media data gathered by Mafindo as well as Indonesian big-data consultancy Drone Emprit shows that allegations using China as a bogeyman are widespread in Indonesia, where suspicions about the wealth of the ethnic-Chinese community and the influence of Beijing run deep.
A disproven video that went viral in January claimed to show seven shipping containers from China at Jakarta’s port filled with millions of ballots punctured in favor of Widodo.
Common misinformation themes against Widodo portray him alternatively as a member of the banned Communist Party of Indonesia, a Chinese plant or anti-Islam.
Prabowo has been depicted as both impious and planning to create a caliphate, while his running mate has been portrayed inaccurately as gay.
All are inflammatory accusations in the world’s largest Muslim-majority country, which rights groups say recently has seen increased prejudice against religious and LGBT minorities.
The stories work. Although Widodo enjoys a double-digit lead over Prabowo, three surveys found that a minority of the population believes that he is either a communist or a Christian.
According to a poll in December last year, as many as 42 percent of Prabowo supporters believed this about Widodo, while 65 percent of Widodo supporters believed Prabowo kidnapped democracy activists while in the military, a claim he strenuously denies.
Experts say such polarization is dangerous for Indonesia and could stoke anger against minorities.
“This kind of fake news gains traction because they’re the seeds of intolerance in our society and it’s not being addressed,” Dhyatmika said.
Additional reporting by Yerica Lai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95