Although liberty, equality and democracy are deeply rooted in people’s minds, controversy at the London School of Economics and Political Science has triggered heated debate and made people reflect once again on the respect and inclusive spirit beneath these values.
On March 26, the institute unveiled a sculpture titled The World Turned Upside Down designed by Turner Prize winner Mark Wallinger.
Wallinger was quoted as saying: “This is the world as we know it from a different viewpoint. Familiar, strange and subject to change.”
The intention of the artwork was to inspire people to view the world from different perspectives, as well as to reflect on the spirit of progressive inquiry that has characterized the institute since its inception with the motto “rerum cognoscere causas” (“to know the causes”) on its badge.
However, the work with its profound meaning has been caught up in controversy.
Echoing the soul of the work as an academic, I would like to express my humble opinion to reconsider and reflect on this issue from a broader and more inclusive perspective.
As Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society in the UK, I was deeply moved by the astonishing concept of the design, which encapsulates the spirit of turning the world upside down to convey the anticipation of enlightening people to reflect on the world with broader and more inclusive visions, as well as bring liberty, equality and other shared values to understand and embrace this world. Its location at the London School of Economics and Political Science, a world-renowned institute, no doubt endowed this artwork with more educational impact.
Furthermore, the UN officially launched its Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in 2015, highlighting the critical issues that society is facing and emphasizing that everyone in the world should endeavor to achieve the goals, especially SDG No. 17, which stresses the importance of global partnerships.
Former UN Assembly president Mogens Lykketoft said that the “global goals will only be realized in a world of peace, security and respect for human rights.”
The spirit of the goals is also reflected in the artwork, with the title from a ballad of the same name that dates back to the English Revolution, or English Civil War, from 1642 to 1651. It was used as a tribute to Protestant reformer and political philosopher Gerrard Winstanley and the ideals of the Protestant Digger Community.
Winstanley’s “The True Levellers Standard Advanced” manifesto says that “when once the Earth becomes a common treasury again, as it must... Then this enmity in all lands will cease, for none shall dare to seek a dominion over others, neither shall any dare to kill another, nor desire more of the Earth than another.”
The artwork is full of inspirational insights, but it has accidentally triggered a controversy about sovereignty.
From the perspective of geography, the world already knows that Taiwan is no doubt one of the most important countries in East Asia, as it embraces and guards the values of liberty, equality and democracy, which are true values shared by society.
As a member of the world, Taiwan has its own identity and cherishes basic human rights.
SDG No. 17 says that identity and international space should be respected, rather than be suppressed by totalism. The coprosperity of all societies lies in global partnerships, which can only be achieved through respect and an inclusive spirit — the values beneath liberty, equality and democracy.
Most importantly, the human worth should not be represented with power, but practiced through humanitarian care, and the assurance and protection of the dignity and rights of all to have the basic human rights of liberty, equality and democracy.
However, a look back at human development shows that progress has not been smooth, but has zigzagged. The development and inheritance of civilization is never ending, with education playing an indispensable role.
The London School of Economics and Political Science — as a world-renowned institute that inherited fine traditions — should promote the civilization of society, rather than surrendering to powers.
Hopefully, it will reconsider its decision and prove to the world again that this first-class institute founded in a traditional democratic country is always persistent on the true values shared by human societies in all circumstances.
Chen Chih-wei is a fellow of the UK’s Royal Geographical Society and a visiting professor at University College London. He is on the National Council for Sustainable Development.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers