Across vast tea plantations that sit atop the rolling hills separating two of Indonesia’s largest cities, excavators dig out a series of giant tunnels for the country’s first high-speed rail line.
The US$6 billion project linking the capital, Jakarta, with Bandung, about 150km away, is expected to cut the travel time between them to about 40 minutes. The journey now takes about four hours on a road clogged with trucks packed to the brim, and it can easily double when the wet season brings daily downpours.
In theory, the project should be a point of pride for Indonesian President Joko Widodo, the man popularly known as Jokowi who holds a commanding lead heading into an April 17 election, but it has been hampered by delays, and even members of his own administration have raised concerns over the transparency of its financial backer: China.
“The Jakarta-Bandung high-speed train represents everything that’s wrong with Belt and Road,” Indonesian Investment Coordinating Board Chairman Tom Lembong said in an interview last month, adding that he still remains a supporter of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s ( 習近平) ambitious plan to finance global infrastructure.
“It’s opaque and non-transparent — even us Cabinet members are having trouble getting data and information,” Lembong said.
While he does not doubt that the populous area can sustain a network of high-speed rail lines over the next few decades, he called the project “deeply troubled” and lamented the lack of financial modeling or due diligence.
Those sentiments are shared by Prabowo Subianto, who is challenging Jokowi for the presidency. To make up ground in the polls, the former general known by his first name is in part tapping into anti-China sentiment that has a long and occasionally ugly history in Indonesia — and has recently swept across Asia.
Last year, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad stormed to power after promising to review Chinese investments, including a high-speed rail line. Myanmar has reassessed the price tag of a China-backed port, while Thailand’s opposition plans to review Chinese investments if it takes power after a disputed election this month. Tiny Maldives also booted a pro-China administration in a shift toward India.
Prabowo has said he welcomes Chinese investment, but it must also benefit Indonesia. He has vowed to review the high-speed rail project, and also to get a fairer deal in trade with Beijing.
Indonesia’s trade deficit with China surged to US$18.4 billion last year, up from about 40 percent since Jokowi came to power in 2014.
China has presented a dilemma for Jokowi from early in his presidency. On the one hand, stronger ties with Beijing and billions of dollars of cheap financing help him bring jobs and overcome a shortfall of government revenue. At the same time, it risks fueling impressions that Indonesia is becoming too indebted to China, leaving him open to political attacks.
“Jokowi has been very careful not to criticize China in most circumstances,” said Aaron Connelly, a Singapore-based research fellow at the Institute for International and Strategic Studies. “He is caught between a rock and hard place.”
Some Chinese investment in Indonesia is driven by economics, such as nickel mining in Sulawesi, but the high-speed rail project turned into a bidding war between China and Japan, Connelly said.
“China offered lending rates and promises in terms of completion and delivery — which it hasn’t fulfilled — that were pretty extraordinary,” he said.
Jokowi’s administration last month said it would offer projects worth US$91 billion to China with a focus on developing four separate economic corridors. He is scheduled to head to Beijing later this month for a Belt and Road summit hosted by Xi.
China is also backing several other big-ticket projects besides the high-speed rail. A US$1.6 billion hydro-electric dam supported by the Bank of China has been proposed for North Sumatra. On the island of Borneo, a Chinese state-owned company is set to build hydro-power plants worth almost US$18 billion.
Jokowi’s campaign has sought to downplay his dealings with China, noting that former Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono also partnered with the country on projects. It pointed to the Jakarta metro, which opened last month after three decades of planning, as an example of a partnership with Japan.
“It is not true if people think President Jokowi has special preference for China-funded projects,” Ace Hasan Syadzily, a spokesperson for his campaign, said by telephone on Friday.
He also said the decision to build the high-speed rail “was taken with sound, prudent judgement,” even as he acknowledged the campaign would not be featuring the project in its bid to woo voters.
Sandiaga Uno, a tycoon who is running on a ticket with Prabowo, said his campaign would push for Chinese investment that creates “good jobs” and “a fair deal” that benefits both countries.
With nationalist sentiment running high and economic growth well short of the 7 percent growth promised by Jokowi when he took office, it is a message that might resonate with an electorate already fearful of China’s growing economic clout.
“We will get a better deal,” Uno said in an interview.
Chinese investment “has to benefit the Indonesian people and it has to be rational,” he said.
In 2013, during a trip to Indonesia, Xi proposed a broader vision that would become known as the Belt and Road Initiative a month after he first mentioned the concept of an economic belt based on the ancient Silk Road on a visit to Kazakhstan.
Indonesia was among a host of developing countries that jumped at the chance to fast-track infrastructure plans.
Lembong said he expected China to reboot the Belt and Road at this month’s summit to make it more green, more transparent and more professional.
That desire to make the initiative a success would ultimately help projects like the high-speed rail, which will need to be expanded over time, he added.
“When the stakes get big enough it’s both lender and borrower’s problem, so we’re aligned actually,” Lembong said. “Neither side wants a 150-kilometer white elephant.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past