The destruction wrought by Cyclone Idai in southern Africa last month shows that weather warnings must spur action and infrastructure has to be built with climate risks in mind if people are to be kept safe on a warming planet, researchers and officials said.
The death toll from the powerful storm packing high winds, which barreled inland, has risen above 700 across Mozambique, Malawi and Zimbabwe, with floods caused by the weather system affecting nearly 3 million people.
The region might also have lost infrastructure worth more than US$1 billion in the disaster, including damage to the Mozambican port of Beira, the coastal city where the cyclone came ashore, according to the UN Economic Commission for Africa.
Illustration: Yusha
Mami Mizutori, head of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), said the devastation in and around Beira — where vast areas were flooded — was “a clear demonstration” of climate change adding to a pre-existing cocktail of risk rooted in poverty, unplanned urbanization, environmental degradation and weak ability to prepare.
“It is particularly distressing that severe damage has been done to schools, hospitals, health facilities and other key infrastructure, as this will have serious consequences for the long-term efforts of these countries to eradicate poverty and hunger,” Mizutori said in e-mailed comments.
Scientists are still exploring if and how global warming might have increased the rainfall and storm surge brought by the cyclone, but they have made general observations about how climate change could have worsened the situation.
Erin Coughlan de Perez, manager of the climate science team at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Center, said climate change had increased average sea levels in the region, meaning it very likely boosted Idai’s storm surge, which hit informal settlements in low-lying parts of the city.
In many cases, warmer ocean temperatures fuel more intense rainfall in storms like Idai, with the large amount of rain dumped inland in Malawi, Mozambique and Zimbabwe responsible for many deaths and enormous loss of infrastructure.
Coughlan de Perez and other researchers said forecasts for Cyclone Idai had been accurate and well-disseminated.
What was missing was a detailed understanding of how different areas would be affected and a joined-up plan to act on the information, they said.
Douglas Parker, a professor of meteorology at the University of Leeds, said getting government departments to coordinate their response — something Britain has done to manage flooding emergencies better in recent years — was a tough task.
“Every country in the world faces these challenges, but in countries where the communications or governance of things are not as advanced as they might be ... then it can be a greater challenge,” he told reporters.
In Africa, weather extremes tend to be more severe, such as heavier rainfall and fiercer droughts, and people are more vulnerable “so the effects of a breakdown in communication or a lack of action are much more dramatic,” he said.
The Mozambican government began to put in place emergency staff and supplies ahead of Cyclone Idai’s arrival, although earlier flooding in the same areas hampered preparations, according to the US government development agency, USAID.
The Mozambican National Institute of Disaster Management, estimating that 600,000 people could be affected by the storm, also coordinated evacuations of those in its path, and distributed alerts and updates to communities via mobile phones, USAID said.
In addition, efforts by local Red Cross volunteers to warn people and get them to seek shelter did help save lives, said Coughlan de Perez, but added that there was a limit to what could be achieved at relatively short notice.
“You can’t do everything five days before a storm,” she told reporters. “This needs to be coupled with long-term investments — and that is [in] climate change adaptation and that is [in] good development.”
Mizutori said that while governments around the world must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to limit temperature rise, there should be “equal emphasis” on investing in stronger infrastructure for poorer countries that lack the resources to adapt to more extreme weather and rising seas.
“Much more needs to be done in this regard or it will be extremely difficult to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, many of which depend on a reduction in disaster losses,” she added, referring to the UN’s global targets that include ending poverty and hunger by 2030.
Coughlan de Perez said that when the time came to start rebuilding homes, schools, clinics, roads and other facilities destroyed by Cyclone Idai, factoring in the rising risks of wilder weather would be key.
“I do hope people will be looking at long-term trends as well — not just building back for yesterday’s climate, but building back for today’s climate and tomorrow’s climate,” she said.
While she expected aid agencies, authorities and others to have good intentions in that regard, whether there would be enough funding and political momentum to ensure a climate-safe recovery was unclear.
“I think that is where we need to hold ourselves accountable,” she said.
Rui Carlos da Maia, director of the disaster risk management unit at the Technical University of Mozambique (UDM), said he feared his country would be slow to learn the lessons of the disaster.
Politicians were poorly educated on the threat climate change poses, while the government lacked the money, equipment, human resources and will to build back better, he told reporters.
The city of Beira should never have been constructed in such a flat, flood-prone area, Da Maia said, but “from previous experience, they will rebuild in the same places.”
Schools and hospitals were unlikely to be made safer, as construction contracts often go to the lowest bidder and building codes are not respected, he said.
In general, understanding of the risks accompanying climate change and how to address them was low in Mozambique, he said.
“We have to help African governments embed climate change into public policy,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers