Following his breakthrough trip to China in 1972, President Richard Nixon had intended to move quickly toward formal recognition of Beijing, but domestic scandal forced his resignation two years later, and the moment passed. China fell into disorder and a successional struggle following the death of Mao (毛澤東) in 1976.
Detente with Moscow began to weaken as the Soviet Union continued its aggressive behavior in Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia, exacerbated by the Party leader Leonid Brezhnev’s declining health. The Sino-Soviet rift, which began in the late fifties, had disintegrated into border clashes and ideological feuding by the late seventies. Mao’s successor, Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), continued the hostile policy toward China’s northern neighbor. Thus it seemed natural for the US to finally formalize reality by establishing formal diplomatic relations with Beijing under President Jimmy Carter as of January 1, 1979.
Though this didn’t come as a complete shock to Taipei, it was nonetheless a major blow to the island state, which had been hemorrhaging formal diplomatic partners to China already for some time. The Carter Administration, focused on a hostile attitude toward Moscow, decided to establish diplomatic ties with Beijing, to reflect the warming nature of the bilateral relationship.
Taiwan was almost an afterthought, from the Carter White House’s perspective. The US Embassy on Chung Shan Road was closed, and the staff of the mission began informal meetings at the home of the former Deputy Chief of Mission. Washington had given relatively little thought to what would come next with Taipei, though it did leave its diplomatic staff in place for the time being.
Fortunately for Taiwan, it retained many friends in the US, including a well-organized pro-Taiwan group in the Congress. Working with friends of Taiwan in the State Department ranks, as well as academics and a sympathetic Taiwan-American population, Congress quickly came up with draft legislation that became known as the Taiwan Relations Act, which passed Congress that March and was signed into law by President Carter on April 10, 1979.
The TRA, now approaching its fortieth anniversary, has proved an enduring piece of legislation, sustained by continuing Congressional and public support. The TRA formalized the existence of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). It also provided for military arms sales as well as an informal structure of contacts between Washington and Taipei, that aimed to maintain the same spirit of close relations long enjoyed prior to the break in relations.
I showed up in Taipei in April, 1981, a young Foreign Service Officer excited to be returning to a place where I had lived in as a boy nearly twenty years earlier. I found the American staff there still quite cautious not to press the boundaries of formality in our dealings with local authorities. But the election of old Taiwan friend Ronald Reagan to the White House, and his appointment of veteran Sinologist Jim Lilley as second Director of AIT, began a shift toward more cordial and expansive dealings with our old friends on the island. Our local counterparts also found creative ways to sustain vital relations, as always bolstered by a sympathetic US Congress.
Much has changed in the ensuing four decades. Taiwan has prospered economically and matured into a modern democratic society, one of the most open in all of East Asia. The economy has moved through several stages, ensuring its competitiveness both regionally and globally. Under Deng Xiaoping, China has emerged as one of the largest economies in the world, sustained by high growth rates despite the regime’s reluctance to match that with meaningful political liberalization.
Successive US Administrations of both parties have been careful to reassure our Taiwan friends of the ongoing commitment to the island’s stability and security, both in word and deed. Under the TRA, Washington has provided defensive weaponry and training to the Taiwan military, while also maintaining a robust military presence in the region. Despite the recent rise of Chinese military power, America and its allies retain considerable means of checking any PRC aggression toward the island, should Beijing be so foolish as to attempt such.
The vitality of US-Taiwan relations over the past four decades, even in the absence of traditional diplomatic ties, is a remarkable success. AIT is formally moving into a new office complex in Nei Hu (內湖) this April that can accommodate the 500 odd officers and staff of the institute. These numbers reflect significant growth over that time period. Every US Administration during this time has honored Washington’s commitments to Taiwan’s safety and security, buttressed by an extremely supportive Congress and a legion of supporters in American society.
Many of us harbor long overdue hope that China will join the modern world politically by opening up its society. That could well facilitate a more realistic attitude toward Taiwan, as well as possibly ease concerns over unprovoked aggression from the mainland. But until and unless the cross-strait calculus shifts, our friends in Taiwan can rest assured that the bipartisan support for the island and its democratic people will continue. The TRA has proved a solid template for supporting this robust relationship, and I see no reason to doubt its efficacy into the foreseeable future.
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers