The next global downturn might still be a little way off. The chances that the North Atlantic as a whole will be in recession one year from now have fallen to about one in four. German growth might well be positive this quarter, while China could rebound, too. And although US growth is definitely slowing — to 1 percent or so this quarter — this might yet turn out to be a blip.
Let us hope so, because if the next downturn is looming, North Atlantic central banks do not have the policy room to fight it effectively.
Should a recession arrive, the US Federal Reserve would ideally be able to cut interest rates by 5 percentage points, as is customary in such situations. However, with short-term safe interest rates at 2.4 percent, it cannot. And with euro and yen interest rates still at about zero, the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan would be unable to help much, either.
Looking ahead, therefore, the big risk is not that inflation will start spiraling upward, with the Fed unable to raise interest rates fast enough to stabilize the economy.
Rather, it is the downside risk that a year from now, the North Atlantic will be in recession, governments will not provide enough fiscal stimulus and the Fed will not be able to reduce interest rates enough — leaving it nearly helpless to even try to stabilize the economy.
The logical response to such an asymmetric risk is — or ought to be — to buy insurance to cover it. However, worryingly, the Fed is not taking out any policy insurance at all against a possible recession, despite having at least three possible options from which to choose.
For starters, the Fed could raise interest rates further now, creating more room for rate cuts if the US economy subsequently falls into recession, but Fed Chair Jerome Powell seems to have ruled out this option for the time being.
In a recent interview, Powell said that the Fed’s policy rate “is in an appropriate place” in view of “muted” US inflation and increasing evidence that the global economy is slowing.
“We’re going to wait and see how those conditions evolve before we make any changes to our interest rate policy,” he said.
Alternatively, the Fed could cut interest rates today to try to compensate for its inability to reduce rates enough in a future downturn. If growth then recovers and strengthens — as more likely than not it will — there is no harm done. US inflation expectations are well anchored, so the Fed could fully and cheaply offset looser monetary policy now with a tighter stance later.
However, if growth does not pick up and the North Atlantic falls into recession, the Fed would have to cut interest rates frantically at the end of this year, and it will greatly regret that it did not get ahead of the curve by pre-emptively lowering rates today.
The Fed’s third option is to leave interest rates unchanged for now, but clearly and aggressively explain how it would fight a recession effectively, should one arrive over the course of the next year. In doing so, the Fed would need to be far more convincing than it was from 2010 onward, when the US economy was struggling to recover from the 2008 financial crisis.
On that occasion, then-Fed chair Ben Bernanke’s monetary policy — and his pleas to Republican lawmakers and austerity hawks to put the national interest ahead of partisan point-scoring and support aggressive fiscal stimulus — were completely ineffective in generating growth above previous trend rates. As a result, the US recovery was anemic and unsatisfactory.
A more credible Fed plan to fight a possible recession next year, in 2021 or thereafter might well boost business confidence and make the central bank’s policies more effective. At the very least, it would reassure companies and investors who, fearing that US aggregate demand will be weak next year, might be starting to pull back.
However, this third option would require an aggressive intellectual and communications effort from the Fed, and there has been no evidence of one.
If the US falls into recession over the next year or two, the Fed might have very little room to loosen policy, and yet, it is not taking any steps to cover that risk. That is unwise.
Unless the Fed buys some recession insurance soon, the US — and the world — might well face much bigger problems later.
J. Bradford DeLong is a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, and a research associate at the US National Bureau of Economic Research. He was deputy assistant US Treasury secretary under former US president Bill Clinton.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from