Almost every day, “Janda,” a self-described Indonesian housewife with 2,000 Twitter followers, dispenses lifestyle tips, complains about city life and praises how the government of Indonesian President Joko Widodo has improved her life as a young mother.
However, Janda the housewife does not exist. The Twitter account’s real owner is an unmarried middle-aged man who offers political social media services backing Widodo’s re-election campaign.
He is a leader of one of the many so-called “buzzer” teams, named for the social media buzz such groups aim to create, that have sprung up in Indonesia ahead of the presidential election next month in the world’s third-largest democracy.
“Our battleground is social media. The content we are making for the election is reaching at least a million people per week,” the owner of the Janda account said, declining to be named because his work is legally in a gray area.
In interviews, more than a dozen buzzer team members, social media consultants and cyberexperts described an array of social media operations that they said were spreading propaganda on behalf of Widodo and his challenger, retired general Prabowo Subianto.
Widodo enjoys a comfortable lead in most opinion polls over Prabowo, as the challenger is widely known. The two contested the previous election in 2014 as well, and Widodo won narrowly.
Fake news was spread in that election as well, although social media was less far-reaching than it is now.
Under Indonesia’s broad Internet defamation law, creating and spreading fake news is illegal, but holding social media accounts in false names is not, unless a real person is being impersonated. However, social media companies mostly bar holding accounts under false names.
Three buzzers directly involved in the campaign described how they operate hundreds of personalized social media accounts each on behalf of the candidates. One denied propagating fake news, while two said they did not care about the accuracy of the content.
Both campaign teams deny using buzzers or spreading fake news.
Ross Tapsell, an expert on politics and media at the Australian National University, said that it has become normal for candidates in Southeast Asia to hire online campaign strategists, who in turn tap an army of people to spread content on social media.
“So there is no direct link at all to the candidate,” he said.
The buzzer campaigns have far outstripped the efforts of Facebook and other social media companies to curtail creation of fake accounts and spread fake news, cyberexperts say.
Reporters found that while robot accounts were occasionally deleted, personalized fake accounts such as “Janda” are widespread on Twitter and Facebook, despite violating the companies’ rules.
Misinformation spread by real accounts — which are often co-opted by buzzer teams — is rampant on Facebook as well as on its Instagram and WhatsApp affiliates, and rival service Twitter. The companies say they are working with the government and fighting back against false content.
Representatives for Twitter, Facebook and Whatsapp said they regularly delete fake accounts in Indonesia, but declined to share removal numbers.
A Twitter spokeswoman said it is working to remove networks of accounts engaged in misinformation and disinformation.
Facebook, which counts Indonesia as its third-largest market globally with an estimated 130 million accounts, said it trains election management bodies how to flag fake news to the company, which is then evaluated by moderators and deleted if it breaks its community standards.
For Indonesian Minister of Communication and Information Technology Rudiantara, those efforts are not enough.
He said the government had asked social media companies to work with authorities to create a standard operating procedure that would allow fake news and hoaxes to be flagged and resolved. They have yet to comply.
“We expect it to get much worse as we get closer to the election,” said Harry Sufehmi, cofounder of Mafindo, an Indonesian organization fighting fake news, which listed nearly 500 social media hoaxes related to politics last year.
He was one of three experts whose research found that a larger proportion of the misinformation targets Widodo, with some posts depicting him as anti-Islam, a Chinese stooge or a communist.
All are inflammatory accusations in a nation that has the world’s largest number of Muslims, where the communist party is banned and suspicions linger over the influence of Beijing.
A smaller portion of the misinformation campaigns target Prabowo.
On one afternoon in Jakarta, a buzzer team leader scrolled through two mobile phones that had more than 250 Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Youtube and Twitter accounts, each with a fake persona. He updated five of them with posts praising Widodo’s achievements or mocking Prabowo and his running mate.
He denied disseminating misinformation, focusing instead on content that gushed about his clients’ virtues, but he admitted he does look for dirt on opponents as part of a “complete package” of posts and videos that he sells for 200 million rupiah (US$14,037) a month.
His staff of 15, who he refers to as “cybertroops,” in turn have subcontractors throughout Indonesia, many of whom are unaware of the ultimate identity of clients, he said.
He said he was hired by an adviser to Widodo’s campaign.
Ace Hasan Syadzily, a spokesman for the president’s campaign team, denied knowledge of such groups, but said: “The campaign had an obligation to counter false or negative narratives” against Widodo.
Another buzzer said he had been hired by advisers to Prabowo, while the third said he supplied services to a social media agency used by both campaigns.
Anthony Leong, the Prabowo digital team’s coordinator, denied they use buzzer teams, saying that the campaign required its “10,000 digital volunteers” to use real names and only allowed them to post “positive content.”
According to the buzzers interviewed, a junior “cybersoldier” can be paid between 1 million to 50 million rupiah per project depending on the reach of their social media accounts.
“For a lot of us, the work is fun ... and the salaries are decent,” said the buzzer who said he is a contractor for a social media agency used by the Widodo and Prabowo campaigns.
He said his role was to create trending topics during key election moments, using hashtags and content provided by his agency in combination with his personal fake accounts, he said.
“For me, there’s no hoax or so-called negative content. The material just comes from the client,” he said.
Pradipa Rasidi, a researcher at the University of Indonesia, said that most buzzers are young graduates who do it “because it’s hard to find a job after university and the pay is higher.”
However, the legal risks are real. Buzzer activities are punishable by jail if they are judged to contravene Indonesia’s Internet defamation law.
All three buzzers declined to be named or provide certain details of their operations because of those risks.
However, policing by the social media companies was not a concern: None had ever had an account or post deleted.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers