When anti-government protests erupted on Russia’s side of the Caucasus Mountains in October last year, authorities did something they had never done before: They cut mobile Internet service to an entire geographical area.
For almost two weeks, tens of thousands of mainly Muslim Russians were prevented from accessing social media Web sites and sharing videos through their smartphones.
Unlike China, where control of the Internet is uniquely centralized, Russia does not yet have an easy way to quarantine negative news, so it had to force commercial carriers to curtail local services one by one.
Illustration: Mountain People
Russia’s censorship deficit relative to China is about to narrow. Backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, lawmakers in Moscow are pushing a bill dubbed “Sovereign Internet” through the Russian Duma that is designed to create a single command post from which authorities can manage and, if needed, halt information flows across Russian cyberspace.
Putin is touting the initiative as a defensive response to US President Donald Trump’s administration’s new cyberstrategy, which permits offensive measures against Russia and other designated adversaries.
However, industry insiders, security experts and even senior officials said that political upheaval is the bigger concern.
“This law isn’t about foreign threats, or banning Facebook and Google, which Russia can already do legally,” said Andrei Soldatov, author of The Red Web: The Kremlin’s Wars on the Internet and cofounder of Agentura.ru, a Web site that tracks the security services.
“It’s about being able to cut off certain types of traffic in certain areas during times of civil unrest,” he said.
Tensions might have subsided along Russia’s southern border over the past four months, but they are ticking up across the country.
Since winning re-election by a landslide in March last year, Putin’s approval ratings have sunk to multiple-year lows, dragged down by decisions to cut spending and raise taxes, while wages continue to slide and consumer prices creep ever higher.
The draft law, which was coauthored by Andrei Lugovoi, a KGB veteran who is wanted in Britain for the 2006 murder of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko, is actually a hodgepodge of bills, some of which have been in the works for years.
According to Putin, the ultimate goal is to ensure that the Runet, as the domestic Internet is known, continues to function in the event that the US tries to isolate its former Cold War foe digitally.
Putin last month told media executives at the Kremlin that he doubted that the US would unplug Russia from the Web, because “it would cause them enormous damage.”
Still, he said the threat is real, so Russia has to prepare.
“They sit there, it’s their invention, and everyone listens, sees and reads what you say,” Putin said. “The more sovereignty we have, including in the digital field, the better. This is a very important area.”
The first step toward the kind of independence envisioned in the legislation is the establishment of the “technical means of countering threats.”
This refers to installing special boxes with tracking software at the thousands of exchange points that link Russia to the wider Web.
The units would feed a single nerve center, allowing regulators to analyze both the volumes and kinds of traffic in real time and selectively block or reroute certain types of flows, be they YouTube videos or Facebook feeds.
So-called deep-packet inspection (DPI) has been a popular tool for operators of large networks for years because it helps optimize user loads.
Content providers use the technology to harvest the increasingly valuable metadata about consumers that they sell to advertisers, but DPI is also a “powerful mechanism” for repression, former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt wrote in 2014.
Not only can DPI censor “objectionable activities,” it can also slow the Internet “for target users or communities,” Schmidt said.
Lugovoi said during hearings that officials have “absolutely no clue about the communications networks laid in Russia and cross-border connections — who owns them, how they’re used, what kind of information is sent.”
Once the monitoring hub is set up, “we’ll be able to see all this online,” he said.
The BBC last month caused an uproar on social media in Russia when it reported that authorities in Moscow were planning to isolate the Runet completely for a few hours this spring to test the system.
However, that is neither true nor technically possible, officials and industry executives who have been briefed on the project said.
Internet providers and wireless carriers are objecting to the bill as written on several grounds, not least of which is expense.
While the government has pledged to pay the costs of implementation, the 20 billion ruble (US$304.20 million at the current exchange rate) estimate put forward by one of the authors would not be enough for procurement, installation and refinement, let alone maintenance, they said.
However, even before getting to that point, officials need to involve market participants in extensive tests of all relevant hardware and software to avoid “major disruptions” that could cost companies tens of billions of rubles in lost revenue, the industry’s main lobby group said in a statement.
Rongbin Han (韓榮斌), a professor of international affairs at the University of Georgia who studies the “Great Firewall of China,” said that all major countries are extending their sovereignty into cyberspace for one very good reason — new threats are emerging all the time.
“Russia is moving in a similar direction as China,” Han said. “You don’t necessarily need to shut down the entire Internet to quash political dissent. It’s smarter just to filter online content.”
One Russian official said that the new law would make it easier for authorities to monitor and disrupt scores of apps and message groups that are have been classified as illegal.
As many as 30 million Russians use such services, the most popular of which is Telegram, a platform founded by rebellious tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov and his mathematician brother, the official said.
Russian efforts in April last year to force Durov, who is based in Dubai, to hand over his encryption keys resulted in protests and mass ridicule. Authorities tried to pull the plug on Telegram in Russia, but ended up bringing down hundreds of unrelated Web sites in the process, including retailers, banks and airline ticketing systems.
The Runet went largely unregulated in the early years of the Putin era as the Kremlin focused on bringing to heel the most influential media outlets of the time, which were in broadcasting and print.
However, censorship has been systematically tightened, particularly since nationwide protests erupted in late 2011, when then-Russian prime minister Putin announced his return to the presidency.
Russia now censors a variety of topics online, often under the pretext of rooting out “extremism.” It also blocks foreign companies such as LinkedIn and Zello that refuse to locate servers inside the country.
In total, about 80,000 sites are currently blacklisted, according to Roskomsvoboda, a Moscow-based group that campaigns against online restrictions.
Group founder Artem Kozlyuk said that if Russia is truly afraid of getting kicked off the Web by the US, then it is playing into the US’ hands by trying to centralize a distributed system.
That would both make the Runet easier to attack and increase the likelihood of some unskilled official crimping connection speeds around the world by mistake, he said.
“Russia is one of the world’s largest hubs for exchanging of traffic, with fast channels,” Kozlyuk said. “Putting monitoring boxes on every node may slow down not only the Runet, but the global Internet. It’s like closing your airspace.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US