Locks need more reflection
The article on the possible imposition of ignition locks for recidivist drunk drivers points out some of the serious problems related to the idea, most notably the non-existence of ignition locks for motorcycles and scooters (“Government mulls ignition locks for drunk drivers,” Feb. 26, page 1).
However, there is a hidden issue that does not appear to be mentioned. The statement that “the executive Yuan is mulling legislation that would require recidivist drunk drivers to install ignition interlocks in their cars” makes no sense because in Taiwan a large fraction of accidents involve drivers that do not own the car they drive, and this is particularly marked among young car drivers.
The problem arises because insurance rates are based on the characteristics of the car owner and the number of accidents in recent years. The base rates for mature females are much lower than those for young people, and young males in particular, so it is much less expensive for a family to have a car owned by the mother of a young male than to have it owned by the young male.
True, after the young male using the car is involved in many accidents, the rates will rise, but then it seems to be a simple matter to change the owner to a grandmother, aunt or older sister.
What does “their car” mean in this context? Do the laws permit the government to demand that the owner, maybe a distant female relative, install ignition interlocks, because a young male was involved in an incident involving driving in an impaired condition, if the driver was a recidivist driving that car for the first time? Or even if the driver was the exclusive user of that car?
By contrast, in the US, insurance rates on any vehicle owned by a household are based on the person in the household with characteristics corresponding to the highest rating, so it is not easy to play the same games.
When my son reached 18 years of age and got a driver’s license, the insurance on the two cars in the household would have been more than double, except for the fact that he had moved to Canada for his university education and he was no longer a member of the household.
Moreover, in the US, there have been cases in which a grandmother who provided funds for a recidivist driver to purchase and insure a new car was required to pay damages for an accident incurred by the driver using the new car in an impaired condition because the court found that the grandmother had acted recklessly and endangered public safety in providing the financing, when she knew the history of recidivism.
Does Taiwan have such laws and are they being used?
Emilio Venezian
New Taipei City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers