Standing on the court steps last month after spending a night in detention, Philippine journalist Maria Ressa spoke defiantly to the dozens of gathered cameras.
This was the sixth time she had posted bail in the space of 18 months, she said.
“I will pay more bail than convicted criminals,” Ressa said. “I will pay more bail than [former Philippine first lady] Imelda Marcos.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Ressa, the editor and founder of Rappler, a Philippine online news outlet that has been highly critical of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, has borne the brunt of a targeted crackdown on opposition media in the nation, which just two years ago was considered something of a beacon of free press in Southeast Asia.
The witch-hunt against Ressa and Rappler has seen the small, but influential news organization hit with a never-ending series of investigations and charges, from accusations of illegal foreign ownership and tax evasion to the latest charge of cyberlibel.
While it is a stark illustration of the Duterte regime’s increasing disregard for press freedom, it is also part of a broader regional trend, which is seeing criminal law weaponized to target journalists and muzzle the press.
“Southeast Asia has never been an easy place for press freedom, but what we have seen recently is a really alarming decline in almost every country, from arrests in Myanmar and the complete obliteration of opposition press in Cambodia to everything that’s been happening to Rappler in the Philippines. Then also in Thailand, where the junta have spent the past five years of their rule steadily crushing media freedom,” said Shawn Crispin, Southeast Asia representative for the Committee to Protect Journalists.
In September last year, Reuters journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were sentenced to seven years behind bars in Myanmar for breaking the official secrets act.
The pair had been investigating the military’s massacre of the Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State and were among the first to reveal the levels of brutality.
Reuters allege the men were set up because of their journalism.
However, despite a case full of flimsy and contradictory evidence, they were convicted and Aung San Suu Kyi’s government has repeatedly resisted calls for them to be pardoned.
Free Expression Myanmar director Yin Yadanar Thein called the situation “dire and marked by self-censorship and fear.”
While the election of the National League for Democracy government in 2015, led by Burmese State Councillor Aung San Suu Kyi, was supposed to mark a new era for freedom of expression in Myanmar, she said it could not be further from the reality.
The situation was only worsening, she said, leaving the vast majority of Burmese with media “that sounds like something out of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four.”
While not yet at the same censorship levels as Myanmar, the weaponization of the law against critical journalists like Ressa is also increasingly becoming the norm in the Philippines and cases have also been filed against the board of the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper and news channel ABS-CBN.
Rappler itself is facing nine legal cases and when Ressa was taken in Philippine National Bureau of Investigation officers, she was held overnight in what she described as a stunt.
“The whole thing was just an intimidation tactic to make me and the Rappler team feel like they have the power to take away our freedom, and that’s extremely petty,” Ressa said, accusing the government of using “mob tactics.”
“But in the end they overplayed their hand, it just shows abuse of power by the government against the press,” she added. “And they chose the wrong journalist to pick on.”
Thailand, like the Philippines, was also once held up for its independent media, but five years of military rule following the 2014 coup has all but strangled the free press, with multiple journalists arrested and prosecuted for critical coverage of the military under the computer crimes act or charged under the draconian lese majeste act, which prevents any criticism of the monarchy.
While most of the nations in the region have seen a slow burn in the decline in press freedoms, the obliteration of the free press in Cambodia was quick and severe.
It followed the dissolution of all opposition political parties and led the way for Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen to run uncontested and unchallenged in the press in July last year.
In less than two years, Cambodia went from having a fairly vibrant media industry to the closure of the main opposition paper the Cambodia Daily, the closure of all independent national and local radio stations, the arrest of multiple journalists and the change in ownership of the Phnom Penh Post.
The paper is now run by a businessman with connections to Hun Sen, which has led to noticeably pro-regime coverage shift.
There have been international factors at play. Under US President Donald Trump’s administration, the US influence on human rights in Southeast Asia has waned considerably.
Washington has drawn closer to Vietnam strategically and economically, while the Hanoi regime continued to ramp up arrests, torture and exile of journalists and dissident bloggers over the past 18 months.
“Together with Trump’s domestic attacks on journalists it sends a signal to Vietnam that press freedom is not a priority and that the US is willing to ignore how abysmal the situation is for journalists there,” Crispin said.
Pivotal too is the increasing powerful political and economic influence of China. Over the past year Beijing has invested billions into countries across the region, such as Cambodia, and emboldened them to demolish opposition media.
“Several Southeast Asian governments are seeing China’s authoritarian regime as a model, while others are getting direct support for surveillance and censorship technology from China,” said Matthew Bugher, head of the Asia program at humans rights organization Article 19.
The only possible beacon of hope in the region is Malaysia, though optimism has dimmed in recent months.
While Malaysia has long had some of the most draconian laws used against journalists and critics — in particular the sedition law, the printing presses act and the recent anti-fake news law — the toppling of Najib Razak as prime minister in May last year was supposed to herald a new era for press freedom.
However, the new coalition government led by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has failed to repeal any of the laws that have been used to target critical journalists in the past. Even an attempt to repeal the anti-fake news law, passed by Najib just before his fall from power, failed in the Senate.
Zulkiflee Anwar Ulhaque, the celebrated Malaysian political cartoonist known as Zunar, who was persecuted by the Najib regime and given multiple charges for sedition, is not optimistic.
“All the laws that were used by the previous government to shackle critics, they still exist, and I see no serious steps to abolish them,” Zunar said.
“People are still holding back criticism of Mahathir, they still want to give him time, but it cannot last forever,” Zunar added. “I am sure that he will go back to his old way of being a dictator who silences his critics. In my view that is why he is keeping all these laws; because one day he will use them again.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past