Invited by Google Europe to attend a brainstorming session in Paris on the decline of truth, the rise of fake news and ways to counter both, I began my presentation by placing the problem in historical context.
I cited George Orwell’s Looking Back on the Spanish War, in which the author explains that, for him, “history stopped in 1936,” because it was there, in Spain, that he discovered for the first time “newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts.”
It was there that he sensed that “the very concept of objective truth,” ruined by fascism in its red and brown forms, was “fading out of the world,” and it was there, in effect, that men like Joseph Goebbels (“I’m the one who decides who is Jewish and who isn’t”) and later US President Donald Trump (and his “alternative facts”) became possible.
However, as I went on to point out, several intellectual shake-ups occurred before and after the rise of totalitarianism.
First, the Kantian “critique,” which separated the noumenal from the phenomenal realm, limited our knowledge to the latter and posited that we can know phenomena only to the extent that our senses, understanding and reason allow. This critique injects into our relationship with truth a measure of subjectivity of which Brexit’s proponents might be today’s willing victims.
Second, a Nietzschean “perspectivism” turned truth into a “point of view” and judged to be “true” that point of view that makes a being stronger, and “false” that which saddens or diminishes them.
It triggered a second intellectual earthquake, the aftershocks of which necessarily rippled through political systems, giving rise to the metaphysical possibility of leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Third, there was the post-Nietzscheans’ “deconstructionism.” By historicizing the “will to truth” (Michel Foucault), putting truth “in quotation marks” (Jacques Derrida), separating the sign from its referent (Louis Althusser) and miring the obvious in a miasma of charts and graphs (Claude Levi-Strauss) or tying it up in Borromean knots (Jacques Lacan), they probably caused people to lose contact with the simple, robust and irrefutable aspects of the truth.
I then focused on the responsibility of the Internet and Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon for the following sequence of events:
First, an almost infinite amount of speech is set free by digital democracy. The Web then becomes a crowd, a free-for-all, where everyone shows up armed with his or her personal opinions, convictions and truth.
At the end of a shift that was nearly imperceptible amid the virtual roar of tweets, retweets and posts, we demand for our newly affirmed truth the same respect that was paid to the old truth.
We started with the equal right to express our beliefs and wound up conceding that all expressed beliefs have equal value. We began by asking simply to be heard, then demanded that listeners respect our utterances, whatever they might think of them, and ended by warning them not to rank one statement above another or assert that there might be a hierarchy of truths.
We thought we were democratizing the “courage of truth” that was so dear to the later Foucault. We thought we were giving every friend of the truth the technical means with which to contribute, boldly but modestly, to the adventures of knowledge.
Instead, we convened a feeding frenzy. Truth’s body was laid out on the table and, fueled by a cannibalistic urge, we set to tearing it apart. Each of us stitched together a patchwork of certitude and suspicion from the bloody, putrid shreds.
This spectacle promptly gave way, minus Hellenic elegance, to the perversity of a new generation of Sophists holding that truth is a wavering shadow, that the human is the measure of all things and that the truth of each is precisely equal to that of their neighbor.
Given this, and because Google Europe was hosting the event, I proposed three concrete and eminently strategic ideas to the company’s president for partnerships and strategic relations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa Carlo d’Asaro Biondo.
The first proposal is a hall of shame, where, in partnership with the world’s 50, 100 or 200 largest newspapers, the most dangerous fake-news items at any given moment would be listed in real time. Second, a competition on the model of France’s 18th-century academies — from which no less than Rousseau’s two Discourses emerged — would be held. Denizens of the Web would propose a document, video or other work whose power of truth or satire could neutralize the most harmful fake news, with the winner funded to produce the proposed work.
Finally, two-and-a-half centuries after Diderot, a new encyclopedia — yes, an encyclopedia, a real one, the opposite of Wikipedia and its turbid entries — would be produced. Who other than one of the global tech firms has the power — should it decide to use it — to bring together thousands of real experts capable of drawing up an inventory of the knowledge available to us in every discipline?
The choice is clear: encyclopedia or ignorance.
Mend the fabric of the truth or resign ourselves to its definitive rending.
Plunge deeper into the cave, dim and clamorous, or begin to look for the way out.
I would not want to lend undue importance to a single Google event, but could it not be taken as a wake-up call, a challenge to begin a process of critical questioning? Might not those who are responsible for the worst be willing to shoulder some responsibility for repairing the damage, for building up after tearing down? If not them, then who?
Bernard-Henri Levy is a founder of the Nouveaux Philosophes (New Philosophers) movement. His books include Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism, American Vertigo: Traveling America in the Footsteps of Tocqueville and most recently, The Empire and the Five Kings.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
Taiwan’s first case of African swine fever (ASF) was confirmed on Tuesday evening at a hog farm in Taichung’s Wuci District (梧棲), trigging nationwide emergency measures and stripping Taiwan of its status as the only Asian country free of classical swine fever, ASF and foot-and-mouth disease, a certification it received on May 29. The government on Wednesday set up a Central Emergency Operations Center in Taichung and instituted an immediate five-day ban on transporting and slaughtering hogs, and on feeding pigs kitchen waste. The ban was later extended to 15 days, to account for the incubation period of the virus
The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
Art and cultural events are key for a city’s cultivation of soft power and international image, and how politicians engage with them often defines their success. Representative to Austria Liu Suan-yung’s (劉玄詠) conducting performance and Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen’s (盧秀燕) show of drumming and the Tainan Jazz Festival demonstrate different outcomes when politics meet culture. While a thoughtful and professional engagement can heighten an event’s status and cultural value, indulging in political theater runs the risk of undermining trust and its reception. During a National Day reception celebration in Austria on Oct. 8, Liu, who was formerly director of the
RSS