After veteran entertainer Lisa Cheng (鄭惠中) slapped Minister of Culture Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) in the face at a lunar year-end banquet because she was upset with the minister’s attempts to “discredit” Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), reports said that Lisa Cheng is receiving a low-income subsidy of NT$6,000, even though she lives in a luxury apartment — allegations that Cheng denies.
It does not look very good if someone who lives in luxury housing receives a low-income subsidy and it raises questions about our welfare system.
The Pearl S. Buck Foundation is caring for a few hundred children of immigrants and we also receive adoption aid for one to three of our adoptive parents. The adoption aid is not very high, and some people have to apply for low-income subsidies from the Department of Social Welfare.
In one case that I witnessed when accompanying social workers, an immigrant family with four children — who all received assistance from our adoptive parents — altogether six people, lived in Taipei’s last slum, Ankang Community (安康社區). The family was squeezed into a small two-bedroom apartment of about 13 ping (43m2).
The living room was full of miscellaneous things, which they said were materials to be used by immigrants for interior decoration, but the materials did not sell very well at all. There was no space to sit down.
The husband was 60 years old, had prostate problems, high blood pressure and diabetes, and ran a small business that did not even earn him NT$10,000 per month. Fortunately, the family could still put food on the table thanks to a NT$20,000 subsidy from the social welfare department.
I wanted to help the wife improve her business, but did not know how to go about it, and wanted to help the family apply for a subsidy from a large social welfare group, but the husband shook his head and said that they had tried that five years ago, but the application was flatly rejected without a stated reason.
This was perplexing, as the family clearly needed help and it makes one wonder what standards decisions about subsidies are based on.
Generally speaking, low-income households in Taipei are still able to make a living, but in other counties or cities, local government leaders might misappropriate social welfare funds or not handle subsidy applications according to the stipulated standards.
If that is the case, those in need are in a difficult situation.
County and city councils, and the Control Yuan must keep their eyes open and monitor the situation.
Yu Ying-fu is chairman of the Pearl S. Buck Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US