Standing atop the stairs outside his university’s auditorium, 20-year-old campaigner Parit Chiwarak led a protest of hundreds of people calling for an end to Thailand’s ruling military junta.
“The military is supposed to protect the country, not fight the people,” he called out to students gathered this month at Thammasat University in Bangkok, one of Thailand’s most prestigious universities.
“We want elections,” attendees chanted, many of them waving fans emblazoned with hearts reading “Love Democracy.”
Thailand is scheduled to hold its first election since the army seized power in a 2014 coup next month.
The March 24 vote could be swayed by young people, many of them newly politicized and active in a way that has rarely been seen since state forces crushed student pro-democracy movements in the 1970s.
Voters aged 18 to 35 now make up just more than one-quarter of the electorate of about 50 million. Of those, 7 million are eligible to vote for the first time.
While it is not clear which way young people will vote, many have said that they do not favor the junta and the military-backed parties that have been formed to contest the election.
Young Thais for years have been seen as politically apathetic. Many have said that they were turned off by years of paralyzing street protests by Thailand’s two rival factions, the Red Shirt loyalists of exiled former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and establishment Yellow Shirt pro-military royalist groups.
However, nearly five years of direct military rule has led to a small, but determined movement of young people calling for change.
“Young people today are not like before. We’re more politically engaged, and we’re a large voter base,” said Netiwit Chotiphatphaisal, a 22-year-old student advocate. “This is an all-important election for us. It’s more than a transition of politicians, but a testimony whether we accept dictatorship, a life-and-death moment for our future.”
A poll in December last year by King Prajadhipok’s Institute found that 90 percent of young voters aged 18 to 24 surveyed said they would vote in the next election, a departure from conventional wisdom that Thai young people are apathetic where politics are concerned.
That compares to only 37.9 percent of Thais aged 15 to 25 who said they were “quite interested or very interested” in politics ahead of Thailand’s most recent election in 2010 .
“Young people are creating ripples and are more politically awakened,” said Anusorn Unno, a lecturer at Thammasat University.
Most of the student advocacy has focused on calling for elections and has not translated into support for any party.
One new political party is making direct appeals to the youth vote as part of its platform.
The Future Forward party, led by the charismatic heir to an auto parts manufacturing empire, promises a new kind of politics that weakens the military and moves beyond the red-versus-yellow conflicts.
“The young people grew up in a highly divisive society. They don’t see this as the new normal; they seek a way out. They seek change,” said party leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, who at 40 is at least a decade younger than other major parties’ likely prime ministerial candidates, who are all in their 50s and 60s.
Future Forward, made up almost entirely of young progressives with zero experience in politics, touts left-wing policies including scrapping obligatory military conscription for young men and ending economic monopolies for wealthy families.
Also making appeals to young voters are two of the biggest established parties, roughly associated with the Red Shirt and Yellow Shirt rival camps that have taken to the streets over the past decade.
For the Pheu Thai Party, which has won every election since 2001 and is linked to the Red Shirts, there are rampant social media memes of its possible prime ministerial candidate, Chatchart Sittiphan. He is portrayed as The Hulk, among other pop culture references.
Another prominent Pheu Thai candidate, former Thai minister of public health Sudarat Keyuraphan, often takes her teenage daughter on her campaign tours.
The rival Democrat Party, whose opposition to Thaksin gained some support from the Yellow Shirt movement, also heavily promotes its “New Dem” wing of young politicians, including the party leader’s 26-year-old nephew, Democrat legislative candidate Parit Wacharasindhu, who has promised to bring more youth agendas to government.
Even the junta’s leader, Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, has a few youthful fans — although they are harder to find.
“He’s obviously not corrupt like previous governments,” Penumpai Phumxusri, 27, said of Prayuth, a former general.
Over the past few decades, youth activism in Thailand has been muted, haunted by the violent crackdown on student uprisings in the 1970s.
On Oct. 6, 1976, state forces and royalist mobs attacked a group of about 2,000 students inside Thammasat University and killed dozens, accusing them of sympathizing with left-leaning revolutions sweeping through the region at the time.
Now, several young advocates have taken to calling the junta a “dictatorship.” Small protests are held, and satirical cartoons targeting the military have appeared on social media and as street art.
Last year, a music group called Rap Against Dictatorship released a song that notched up about 54 million views on YouTube, with lyrics calling Thailand “a country where the parliament is the military’s living room.”
Social media-savvy young Thais last month also took their frustration to Twitter with a hashtag translated roughly as “not another damn delay” when the junta said that a Feb. 24 election date would be postponed again.
“I have seen a lot of changes in the youths over the past year, like with the rap song and the hashtag, which indicate how much they value their rights and liberties,” Anusorn said. “When the polls roll around, the young and especially the new voters will turn up in high numbers.”
Additional reporting by Panu Wongcha-um
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US