Standing atop the stairs outside his university’s auditorium, 20-year-old campaigner Parit Chiwarak led a protest of hundreds of people calling for an end to Thailand’s ruling military junta.
“The military is supposed to protect the country, not fight the people,” he called out to students gathered this month at Thammasat University in Bangkok, one of Thailand’s most prestigious universities.
“We want elections,” attendees chanted, many of them waving fans emblazoned with hearts reading “Love Democracy.”
Thailand is scheduled to hold its first election since the army seized power in a 2014 coup next month.
The March 24 vote could be swayed by young people, many of them newly politicized and active in a way that has rarely been seen since state forces crushed student pro-democracy movements in the 1970s.
Voters aged 18 to 35 now make up just more than one-quarter of the electorate of about 50 million. Of those, 7 million are eligible to vote for the first time.
While it is not clear which way young people will vote, many have said that they do not favor the junta and the military-backed parties that have been formed to contest the election.
Young Thais for years have been seen as politically apathetic. Many have said that they were turned off by years of paralyzing street protests by Thailand’s two rival factions, the Red Shirt loyalists of exiled former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and establishment Yellow Shirt pro-military royalist groups.
However, nearly five years of direct military rule has led to a small, but determined movement of young people calling for change.
“Young people today are not like before. We’re more politically engaged, and we’re a large voter base,” said Netiwit Chotiphatphaisal, a 22-year-old student advocate. “This is an all-important election for us. It’s more than a transition of politicians, but a testimony whether we accept dictatorship, a life-and-death moment for our future.”
A poll in December last year by King Prajadhipok’s Institute found that 90 percent of young voters aged 18 to 24 surveyed said they would vote in the next election, a departure from conventional wisdom that Thai young people are apathetic where politics are concerned.
That compares to only 37.9 percent of Thais aged 15 to 25 who said they were “quite interested or very interested” in politics ahead of Thailand’s most recent election in 2010 .
“Young people are creating ripples and are more politically awakened,” said Anusorn Unno, a lecturer at Thammasat University.
Most of the student advocacy has focused on calling for elections and has not translated into support for any party.
One new political party is making direct appeals to the youth vote as part of its platform.
The Future Forward party, led by the charismatic heir to an auto parts manufacturing empire, promises a new kind of politics that weakens the military and moves beyond the red-versus-yellow conflicts.
“The young people grew up in a highly divisive society. They don’t see this as the new normal; they seek a way out. They seek change,” said party leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, who at 40 is at least a decade younger than other major parties’ likely prime ministerial candidates, who are all in their 50s and 60s.
Future Forward, made up almost entirely of young progressives with zero experience in politics, touts left-wing policies including scrapping obligatory military conscription for young men and ending economic monopolies for wealthy families.
Also making appeals to young voters are two of the biggest established parties, roughly associated with the Red Shirt and Yellow Shirt rival camps that have taken to the streets over the past decade.
For the Pheu Thai Party, which has won every election since 2001 and is linked to the Red Shirts, there are rampant social media memes of its possible prime ministerial candidate, Chatchart Sittiphan. He is portrayed as The Hulk, among other pop culture references.
Another prominent Pheu Thai candidate, former Thai minister of public health Sudarat Keyuraphan, often takes her teenage daughter on her campaign tours.
The rival Democrat Party, whose opposition to Thaksin gained some support from the Yellow Shirt movement, also heavily promotes its “New Dem” wing of young politicians, including the party leader’s 26-year-old nephew, Democrat legislative candidate Parit Wacharasindhu, who has promised to bring more youth agendas to government.
Even the junta’s leader, Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, has a few youthful fans — although they are harder to find.
“He’s obviously not corrupt like previous governments,” Penumpai Phumxusri, 27, said of Prayuth, a former general.
Over the past few decades, youth activism in Thailand has been muted, haunted by the violent crackdown on student uprisings in the 1970s.
On Oct. 6, 1976, state forces and royalist mobs attacked a group of about 2,000 students inside Thammasat University and killed dozens, accusing them of sympathizing with left-leaning revolutions sweeping through the region at the time.
Now, several young advocates have taken to calling the junta a “dictatorship.” Small protests are held, and satirical cartoons targeting the military have appeared on social media and as street art.
Last year, a music group called Rap Against Dictatorship released a song that notched up about 54 million views on YouTube, with lyrics calling Thailand “a country where the parliament is the military’s living room.”
Social media-savvy young Thais last month also took their frustration to Twitter with a hashtag translated roughly as “not another damn delay” when the junta said that a Feb. 24 election date would be postponed again.
“I have seen a lot of changes in the youths over the past year, like with the rap song and the hashtag, which indicate how much they value their rights and liberties,” Anusorn said. “When the polls roll around, the young and especially the new voters will turn up in high numbers.”
Additional reporting by Panu Wongcha-um
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers