At the current rate of progress, it would take more than 200 years to achieve gender equality and female empowerment at work.
In many countries, girls are still forced to marry young, which limits their access to education and future employment opportunities. In Niger, for example, 76 percent of girls aged 15 to 19 were married in 2016, which partly explains why 73 percent of lower-secondary-school-age girls are out of school.
Child labor is also common and almost one-third of the world’s women believe that domestic violence is a justifiable punishment under certain circumstances, such as burning meals.
What does it say about human values when it is considered more acceptable to beat a woman than to ruin dinner?
Legal frameworks enshrine such values. Today, 10 countries still allow marital rape and nine permit rapists to avoid punishment by marrying their victims.
For many more women, such values inform social arrangements that deny them opportunities. Around the world, the absence of paid maternity leave, childcare facilities or family-friendly job policies prevents women’s participation in the formal economy. Even when women do manage to have a career, they still assume three-quarters of household responsibilities.
Clearly, a more equal, gender-inclusive world will require far-reaching change in perceptions, attitudes, stereotypes and laws. Promoting such change is justified not only on moral grounds, but also in economic terms.
According to our estimates, if countries eliminated gender-based discrimination and granted women greater access to education and jobs, global GDP would increase by US$6 trillion over the next decade, but while the rationale for change might be strong, countries often struggle to develop gender-based policies rooted in solid data and evidence.
To address this gap, in 2009 the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) developed the Social Institutions and Gender Index with data for about 180 countries. Together with the SIGI Policy Simulator, which launched this year, governments can assess how inclusive their gender policies are, identify areas for reform and evaluate the programs they implement.
The data have already yielded important insights. Consider Germany: Although the country ranks high on world gender-equality indexes, SIGI shows that it could enter the top 10 with a relatively simple change: legally mandating equal pay for equal work. The absence of such a requirement costs Germany the equivalent of 1 percent of GDP, according to estimates calculated from the most recent OECD Economic Outlook.
In Chile, granting married women the same property rights as married men would increase total investment by 1 percent. In Vietnam, helping women access the same professional opportunities as men would increase labor-force participation by 1 percent.
In many countries, only mothers are entitled to parental leave, but this reinforces the perception that unpaid care work is a woman’s job, which in turn skews the distribution of domestic duties. Women in Pakistan and India spend, on average, 10 times longer on housework than men do, which means less time engaging in market-related activities, studying or simply relaxing. Nor is this trend unique to South Asia.
So how can governments use SIGI to change laws and advance gender equality? The best way is to learn from the experiences of others.
In South Africa, the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998, combined with the 2006 Civil Union Act, have effectively eliminated forced and child marriage.
In Liberia, a law passed in 2015 entitles women to receive equal pay for equal work.
In 2000, Ethiopia repealed language that gave only men the right to administer family assets.
In 2015, Bulgaria eliminated male-only professions, and in 2002, Sweden sought to help balance childcare responsibilities between parents by increasing the “father’s quota” in the parental leave law from one month to two.
Data and planning made these initiatives possible, and the OECD’s new data sets are designed to help other countries follow suit. Armed with information, leaders can turn rhetoric about gender equality and empowerment into meaningful action.
Ultimately, such action will help to create environments of equality for both women and men, and to build sustainable, respectful and peaceful societies for all of us.
We now have the data to help women fulfill their potential — and to see what happens to all of us when we fail to do so.
Gabriela Ramos is the OECD chief of staff, Sherpa to the G7 and G20, and leader of OECD Gender Strategy. Mario Pezzini is director of the Development Center at the OECD and special adviser to the OECD secretary-general on development.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a