Taiwan strong
The new year is scarcely three weeks old and already we have seen the national sovereignty of Taiwan and the wishes of its 23 million people attacked by China in every imaginable way.
Recently this was carried out in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rather direct and brutal public warning to Taiwan that any assemblage of independence or democracy for Taiwan is completely out of the question as far as the communist authoritarian regime is concerned.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) rather bravely stood up to these aggressive comments by stating that the wishes of the Taiwanese people must be respected within their own homeland without illegal compromise or foreign aggression.
Many international voices have also spoken up in support of Tsai recently, especially from within the US Congress.
Taiwan and the world cannot control the irresponsible and aggressive behavior of neighboring China, nor should it seek to try.
Rather, Taiwan would do well to take the moral and strong defensive high-ground in response to Chinese attacks against its very right to existence.
Where China offers hatred and war, Taiwan should respond with careful, but strong, resolute defense for its own people in the face of imminent military threat. Peace can only be had in the face of tyranny by showing the aggressor that the nation will not collapse when bullied, but will rather stand stronger and more prepared.
Given this year’s aggressive behavior on the part of the Chinese Communist Party against Taiwan, it feels only irresponsible and foolhardy to continue to allow direct flights and shipping of any kind coming to Taiwan from China and/or any territory under its control or vice versa.
In response to China’s military and international aggression against the sovereignty of Taiwan, the routes should all be immediately severed and forced to rather travel via a third, neutral nation such as Japan, South Korea or Vietnam.
There needs to be a responsible defensive response from the government of Taiwan to China’s aggressive behavior.
Taiwan needs to remain committed to peace and non-aggression, but very much does need to take the basic actions to help ensure the continuation of its democracy and liberty. Severing all direct flights and navigation is a logical and reasonable commonsense response.
These could all be resumed when China publicly and in writing renounces any and all acts and threats of war against Taiwan.
In this way the choice would be completely up to China to do the right thing and in the meantime Taiwan would be more secure.
Howard Fass
Massachusetts
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US