On Friday last week, Chen Yu-an (陳昱安), who was sentenced to death for murdering his father in 2010, strangled himself with elastic bands in the Taipei Detention Center. This could not have happened if he had been held in a forensic psychiatric hospital instead of an ordinary prison, because elastic bands are strictly banned in psychiatric wards.
Why should Chen have been held in a forensic psychiatric hospital? First, because he suffered from schizophrenia and depression. Second, because he had long shown serious suicidal tendencies.
Chen’s case was tragic from start to finish. He had mental illness long before his crime, but had no previous criminal record. He killed his father because his father often scolded him for staying at home and not getting a job.
If Chen had received adequate treatment and guidance early on, enabling him to find a job and integrate socially, he would not have done such an awful thing.
Chen’s trial courts arranged for him to undergo several forensic psychiatric evaluations, but the evaluating doctors could not reach a consensus about his mental health. Some could not decide whether he was mentally ill, while others said his mental illness did not impair his cognitive and behavioral capacities.
It is true that Chen’s psychiatric symptoms did not directly cause his act of patricide, but the doctors did not seriously consider his weakened control over his emotions and actions resulting from his long-term psychiatric illness.
If there were forensic psychiatric hospitals in the nation, he could have been held at one and undergone long-term observation, which could have clarified his mental state at the time of the crime.
In 2009, Taiwan adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, giving it the force of law. Chen’s crime took place in 2010, so the convention should have applied to his case. However, in the judges’ reasoning for their verdict, they only cited Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the covenant, which says the “sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes,” while overlooking the principle that mentally and intellectually disabled people should not be sentenced to death.
There is a clear discrepancy in this respect between the sentencing in Chen’s case and those in subsequent similar cases. The spirit of this principle is that even if a person’s behavioral capacities were normal when they committed a crime, a death sentence should not be carried out if they become mentally disabled later on.
Although Chen’s psychiatric evaluations concluded that he was not affected by mental illness at the time of the crime, he should still not be executed if he was confirmed to be mentally ill in prison.
Even if people have committed heinous crimes, if they are mentally ill, their right to receive treatment should still be protected in prison. However, the medical treatment environment in the nation’s prisons makes it very hard to provide adequate psychiatric treatment.
Chen showed depressive tendencies long before his crime, and his emotions remained unstable in prison, eventually leading to his suicide. If he had received sufficient psychiatric treatment, this tragedy might have been averted.
The only way to provide adequate psychiatric treatment for mentally ill offenders would be to establish forensic psychiatric hospitals. Courts currently entrust mentally ill prisoners who need to be held securely to the care of psychiatric hospitals, but it is hard for such hospitals to assume such judicial duties. Ideally, such offenders should be admitted to specialized forensic hospitals.
Shen Cheng-nan is a physician.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US