Thu, Jan 10, 2019 - Page 9 News List

This is the year to stop the threats to humanity

By Robert Muggah and Ian Goldin

Let us hope that this year is the year when the historical tide turns.

Last year, divisions within and between countries continued to deepen, and while geopolitical tensions and political tribalism have transformed international relations and national politics, new technologies are upending long-held assumptions about security, politics and economics.

Complicating matters further is the growing interdependence of societies. Everyone is increasingly subject to forces beyond the control of any one country, city or individual, not least when it comes to climate change.

What a difference three decades makes. In 1989, the collapse of the Soviet Union seemed to augur a triumph for liberal democratic principles and values. The development of the World Wide Web that year promised a new age of human flourishing and global cooperation. As recently as the 2000s, flashy catchphrases like “the death of distance” and “the world is flat” abounded.

Yet, far from flattening the world, globalization has made it more mountainous and uneven. More than ever, one’s postal code determines one’s perspective, lifespan and fate.

Instead of replacing national ideals with shared values, globalization has led to rapacious competition, the decline of welfare states and the corrosion of international institutions. Although there are technically more democracies today than in 1989, many are becoming more illiberal.

Not surprisingly, public support for globalization has waned. The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and the US$5.6 trillion “war on terror” certainly did not help. Nor did the 2008 financial crisis, which exposed the failure of experts and institutions to manage interdependence and technological change.

A growing divide between elites and those “left behind” has poisoned politics for a generation.

Still, the disillusionment with globalization is mostly confined to North America and western Europe. After all, the fortunes of the emerging powers in East and Southeast Asia have risen, and most people around the world are objectively better off in the aggregate than they were 30 years ago.

Outside of the West, average incomes since the fall of the Berlin Wall have doubled — and tripled in China. Life expectancy in many developing countries has increased by 15 years and 3 billion more people worldwide have learned to read and write.

However, there is no guarantee that this “New Enlightenment,” as Steven Pinker of Harvard University has called it, will continue delivering progress. The Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries came in the wake of the Renaissance, which was a period not only of scientific and artistic revolution, but also of rising intolerance, religious warfare, and the persecution of scientists and intellectuals.

The reactionary violence during and after the Renaissance owed much to elites’ failure to manage the rapid change and rising inequalities occasioned by the print revolution. Today’s elites should take note.

The spectacular fallout from the US-led invasion of Iraq and the 2008 financial crisis profoundly damaged public trust in authorities and experts. What unites right and left-wing populism is the idea that the old guard has let the people down while ensconcing itself in a cocoon of privilege.

They have a point. Flawed policies to promote globalization have let everyone down and contributed to growing inequality. Now artificial intelligence and automation are threatening to replace routine jobs and highlight social divisions.

This story has been viewed 2008 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top