Wed, Jan 09, 2019 page8

• Open letter to democratic Taiwan

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  We the undersigned scholars, former government and military officials, and other friends of Taiwan who have witnessed and admired Taiwan’s transition to democracy for many decades wish to express to the people of Taiwan our sense of urgency to maintain unity and continuity at this critical moment in Taiwan’s history.

  It is obvious that during the past two years, the People’s Republic of China has left no stone unturned in its attempts to squeeze Taiwan’s international space, threaten it with a buildup of military power and make it appear as if Taiwan’s only future lies in integration with an authoritarian China.

  This pressure culminated on Wednesday last week with a speech by Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平), telling the Taiwanese people that “the Taiwan question” was a Chinese internal affair, that unification under China’s “one country, two systems” principle was the only option for the future and Taiwan independence was a “dead end.”

  In her response the same day, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that the vast majority of the Taiwanese people strongly rejected “one country, two systems” and that her government had never accepted the so-called “1992 consensus.”

  She then reiterated her “Taiwan consensus” based on the “four musts,” elaborated in her New Year’s address the day before. These include that China must accept the reality of the existence of the Republic of China (Taiwan), and respect the commitment of the 23 million people of Taiwan to freedom and democracy.

  As international scholars, writers and former officials we believe this is the right response. It is also illustrative of the stable and responsible leadership Tsai has displayed in the face of the mounting threat from communist China.

  We applaud the courageous stance of the Taiwanese people in resisting Chinese pressures and protecting their own democratic system.

  However, we express our concerns that Beijing’s latest subversive techniques of deception and disinformation could sow division and confusion in Taiwan’s body politic and create the kind of civil unrest that Beijing lists as one of the pretexts for using force against Taiwan — which would nevertheless constitute aggression in violation of the UN Charter.

  In our view, Tsai is a most effective and knowledgeable statesperson. With her quiet demeanor and careful balancing she has not only significantly advanced Taiwan’s place in the international community, and elevated Taiwan’s profile on the international radar screen, but also stood firm in defending Taiwan’s hard-won freedom and democracy.

  Just as Taiwan has made itself a democratic model for the region, Tsai has earned the respect of other nations for her courageous and composed response to the aggressive bullying of Taiwan’s powerful neighbor. We urge our own governments to make clear to Beijing that Taiwan does not stand alone.

  Taiwan is at a crossroads as never before. It is under an existential threat by the People’s Republic of China. While we respect the reality that Taiwan, like all democratic polities, has a range of domestic issues that must be resolved, that democratic process should proceed in a manner that does not detract from the overall national unity in the face of the larger threat to Taiwan’s existence as a free and democratic nation.

  If Taiwanese across the political spectrum fail to understand this threat, and go on with business as usual, this provides Beijing’s repressive leaders with an opportunity to divide Taiwanese society and increasingly make it an inevitability that Taiwan is incorporated into China.

  This happened with East Turkestan in 1949, Tibet in 1950 to 1951, and Hong Kong in 1997. The repression and lack of freedom and democracy there should serve as a wake-up call for Taiwan.

  We thus appeal to the people of Taiwan to maintain a clear vision for their future as a free and democratic nation that is a full and equal member in the international family of nations. The process may be slow and cumbersome, but it is essential to maintain unity and to be supportive of a democratically elected president who has demonstrated balance, flexibility and toughness.

  These are the qualities Taiwan needs to navigate the stormy seas ahead towards a brighter and more secure future.

  John J. Tkacik, International Assessment and Strategy Center, retired US foreign service officer, Alexandria, Virginia

  Clive Ansley, international lawyer, Courtenay, British Columbia

  Thomas Bartlett, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

  Joseph A. Bosco, Georgetown University (retired), formerly at the office of the secretary of defense, US Department of Defense, Washington

  Kevin Carrico, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

  Frank Chiang, Fordham University Law School, New York

  Peter Chow, City University of New York, New York

  Jerome A. Cohen, New York University Law School, New York

  Michael Danielsen, Taiwan Corner, Copenhagen, Denmark

  June Teufel Dreyer, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida

  Feng Chongyi, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

  Carl Ford, former US assistant secretary of state, National Park University, Park, Arkansas

  Brock Freeman, American Citizens for Taiwan, Seattle, Washington

  Michael Rand Hoare, School of Oriental and African Studies, London

  Thomas G. Hughes, former chief of staff to the late US senator Claiborne Pell, Washington

  Michael A. Hunzeker, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

  J. Bruce Jacobs, professor emeritus of Asian Languages and Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

  Paul Jobin, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, and University of Paris Diderot, France

  Richard C. Kagan, professor emeritus, Hamline University, St Paul, Minnesota

  Michael Y.M. Kau, professor emeritus, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

  Bruno Kaufmann, European Democracy Foundation, Switzerland

  Sasa Istenic Kotar, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

  Paul Kovenock, US Department of State (retired), Washington

  Andre Laliberte, University of Ottawa, Canada

  Perry Link, professor emeritus of East Asian studies, Princeton University, New Jersey

  Victor H. Mair, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  The Very Reverend Dr Bruce McLeod, former moderator, United Church of Canada

  Wayne Pajunen, writer and former legislative aide, House of Commons, Ottawa

  Timothy S. Rich, Western Kentucky University, Kentucky

  Shawna Yang Ryan, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii

  Michael Scanlon, Shih Chien University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  David C. Schak, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia

  James D. Seymour, Columbia University, New York City

  Fang-long Shih, London School of Economics and Political Science, London

  Michael Stainton, Taiwanese Human Rights Association of Canada, Toronto, Canada

  William A. Stanton, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan, Taipei

  Peter Tague, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington

  Ross Terrill, Fairbank Center Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

  Arthur Waldron, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  Gerrit van der Wees, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

  Jack F. Williams, professor emeritus, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

  Yenna Wu, University of California, Riverside, California

  Ambassador Stephen M. Young, US department of state (retired), Londonderry, New Hampshire

  Gordon G. Chang, author of The Coming Collapse of China, New Jersey.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwanese lose status after obtaining single-use Chinese passport

  • 2

    KMT chair to meet with Xi, but at a price: source

  • 3

    Deterring Taiwan conflict a priority: US

  • 4

    Taiwanese tourists go viral in video during Japan quake

  • 5

    US vows deterrence ‘through strength’