Having passed the age of 70, I am getting on in years. After the nine-in-one elections in November last year, I had quite a few chats with young people. I asked them about how they voted and found the thinking of those who voted for non-Taiwan-centric candidates worth discussing.
First, most of them simply wanted to “vote for someone different and see what happens.”
They hardly had any political considerations. They think that as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has not been doing a good job, a different person or party might as well have a go.
When I asked them whether it would be worth it if it led to Taiwan losing its sovereignty, freedom and democracy, their reply was: “No way.”
Second, most of them think that Taiwan’s mother tongues and native cultures have no practical value. They would rather speak Taiwan-style Mandarin and limited English, listen to foreign music and watch foreign films.
When I asked them what they thought about German philosopher Johann Herder’s opinion that the language and culture left to us by our ancestors is very important, they did not know how to answer.
Third, these young Taiwanese who call themselves “naturally pro-independence” do not know much about Taiwan’s languages, history — especially its modern political history — and geography. Neither do they know much about Taiwan’s global ranking in terms of science, technology, economics, politics and culture. They only know that Taiwan is more democratic than China.
Members of my generation all know that the democracy and human rights that Taiwan enjoys today were won by countless forerunners who shed their blood and sweat to achieve it — in many cases sacrificing their lives, their youth or their family wealth. It would be fair to call it “revolutionary” democracy and rights.
We older people are also clear that the democracy and rights we have today are still fragile and could be damaged or even wiped out in a short period of time.
In contrast, members of the so-called “naturally pro-independent” generation have enjoyed democracy and human rights since the day they were born. For them, democracy and rights are “God-given.” In their eyes, democracy, freedom and human rights are completely natural and universal values that are sure to exist forever.
It is a typical political generation gap.
Should we call them fortunate or naive? If they want to call themselves “naturally pro-independence,” they should know a lot about Taiwan and identify with this nation, and they should also know how to present and market it.
That is why the Southern Taiwan Society has always called for education to be Taiwan-centered. Only when Taiwanese of all ages know enough about Taiwan and identify strongly enough with it can they know how to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty, democracy and freedom.
Only then can Taiwan be free of the fear and anxiety that many people are feeling.
Tiunn Hok Chu is a physician and former president of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Local media reported earlier this month that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) criticized President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for referring to China as a “neighboring country,” saying that this is no different from a “two-state” model and that it amounts to changing the cross-strait “status quo.” I find it quite impossible to understand why civilized Taiwan continues to tolerate the existence of such a deceitful group that believes its own lies. The relationship between Taiwan and China is the relationship between two countries, and neither has any jurisdiction over the other — this is the undeniable “status quo.” Those who believe in the
With the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, China has remarketed its East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) concerns. Beijing urged the Taliban to make a clean break with the movement and asked the US to blacklist it again. While some are still debating whether the movement exists, it is not the core of the matter because its existence neither justifies China’s Uighur policy nor sheds light on its concerns after the withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan. Is China really worried, and if so, is it because of the movement? This question needs to be answered. When Chinese officials first acknowledged
On Thursday, China applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) — a regional economic organization whose 11 member countries have a combined GDP of US$11 trillion. That is less than China’s 2019 GDP of US$14.34 trillion, so why is China so eager to join? China says there are two main reasons: To consolidate its foreign trade and foreign investment base, and to fast-track economic and trade relations between China and member countries of the CPTPP free-trade area. China’s bilateral trade with these countries grew from US$78 billion in 2003 to US$685.1 billion last year, mostly because of China’s 2005
US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) talked on the telephone on Thursday last week, the first time the two leaders have done so since Biden assumed the presidency. While each side sought to put their own gloss on the content of the conversation, some common ground did emerge. Biden reportedly said that both sides have a joint responsibility to ensure that competition between the US and China does not spiral into conflict and that there is no reason that the two nations are destined to fall into this trap. The day after the phone call, the Financial Times reported