While China’s bullying and obstruction of Taiwan’s international space is nothing new, the nation this year is expected to face accelerated aggression from Beijing as its haughtiness has been emboldened by the China-friendly Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) gains in the Nov. 24 local elections.
With numerous KMT winners endorsing the so-called “1992 consensus,” Beijing will take it as a sign that pro-China sentiment is rising, despite cross-strait affairs clearly not being the focus during campaigning. Its increasing arrogance is apparent.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Liu Jieyi (劉結一) on Sunday said that “Beijing’s dominance over the general trend of events in cross-strait relations is to grow in 2019” and that “Taiwanese independence forces will continue to provoke incidents, but the mainland will have total control to prevail in the face of those risks ... cross-strait relations will make great leaps toward unification.”
Xinhua news agency yesterday reported that in Beijing today, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is to mark the anniversary of the 1979 “message to compatriots in Taiwan” with a “major speech” on Taiwan.
Beijing’s gloating confidence is understandable when viewing cross-strait affairs from its perspective. Over the past year, aside from a charm offensive to woo Taiwanese, including 31 measures it said would benefit Taiwanese seeking to study, work, live or start a business in China, it has made gains in undermining Taiwan’s sovereign status and international standing by blocking Taiwan’s attendance at World Health Assembly and Interpol events, snatching diplomatic allies, pressing international airlines to refer to Taiwan as part of China on their Web sites, and a malicious move to revoke Taichung’s right to host the first East Asian Youth Games. These incidents were depressing for Taiwanese. The series of vengeful acts were obviously to put pressure on President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration over its non-acceptance of the nonexistent “1992 consensus” as the political foundation for cross-strait dialogue and development.
While the Tsai administration ought to be lauded for rejecting political coercion, its responses — which were in apparent opposition to the party’s founding ideals — to issues such as the appointment of Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) as National Taiwan University president, in which it failed to uphold the law by turning a blind eye to procedural flaws and other allegations, Tsai’s vacillating remarks and self-imposed restrictions on the implementation of transitional justice, and her aloofness toward the referendum to use “Taiwan” instead of “Chinese Taipei” at next year’s Tokyo Olympics, it might be a matter of time before it caves in to China and the nation is disarmed diplomatically.
Fortunately, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Sunday came in time to assuage misgivings.
In summing up the past year and outlining its prospects for this year, it said “it is resolved to defend the nation amid increasing pressure from China and would step up efforts to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty.”
While it might be mere rhetoric, it is at least comforting to know that the ministry has not let its guard down or become passive.
The new year is expected to be a noisy one politically, with Taiwan to enter the campaign season for the 2020 presidential election. The year can also be expected to be a daunting one on the diplomatic front, with Beijing poised to grind its fists into accelerating its agenda to marginalize Taipei.
Hopefully, Tsai’s New Year’s speech today will include a resolution that the government would stand resolute and uncompromising in the face of China’s assaults.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers