More information needed
The article “Measles warning issued in Taipei” (Dec. 24, page 2) raises some questions that are troubling. Some background on the progression of measles is useful in explaining why this matters.
According to the Mayo Clinic Web site, the development of measles occurs in stages. For the first 10 to 14 days after exposure, no symptoms are observed. The next stage is the development of fever, rhinitis, sore throat, and conjunctivitis, which lasts some two or three days. That would range from day 12 to day 17 after the exposure date.
This is followed by specific symptoms, including the first appearance of a rash in the face and would progress to disseminated rash over all the body. The period over which the disease is communicable is given as from four days before the appearance of the rash to four days after that event.
If these symptoms appeared before Dec. 8 it would indicate that the exposure probably occurred before the departure for the Philippines. The period with no symptoms would have extended at least until Dec. 10 and at most until Dec. 18 so the statement that the non-specific symptoms appeared “upon his return to Taipei” raises some doubts about the assumption.
Why was the actual or approximate date not provided? It might possibly indicate that the exposure occurred before the departure for the Philippines.
Using the Mayo Clinic timetable, the rash would have appeared sometime between Dec. 12 and Dec. 20, so it is consistent with the child not having yet developed a rash by Dec. 14, when he was examined by the doctor, and marginally consistent with a hospital admission of Dec. 19, provided the rash had not spread beyond the face. But in that case, why was the child discharged before Dec. 24, while communication of the disease to others was still possible?
Again, the date of the discharge is not provided, but it must have been before the date of publication.
Surely the Centers for Disease Control should be concerned about whether the exposure occurred in Taiwan or the Philippines and about whether hospitals are discharging patients when they might still be capable of spreading the disease.
Emilio Venezian
New Taipei City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95