Since the number of tour groups from China began to decline last year, the government has enacted various measures to prop up the tourism industry, including travel subsidies and promoting the nation in Southeast Asia.
Critics have said that the subsidies are too small, while others have argued that industry operators must change their business model. The government has responded to these criticisms by increasing subsidies, showing that it is taking the issue seriously, but in a puzzling move the Tourism Bureau on Monday said that it was mulling easing regulations to allow more young people into the industry.
Many businesses in southern Taiwan have already folded, citing a lack of Chinese tourists, but maybe the bureau is right to encourage younger players in the market. After all, many of the failed businesses had catered largely to tour groups and the trend now seems to be toward individual travelers. Tour groups often book inexpensive transportation and accommodations, and the members of the groups tend to spend little while in the nation. Yet, many industry operators seem to cling to these groups, unable to adjust to a changing market.
Tour groups can also be problematic, as they have an expedited visa process, which can sometimes be detrimental. The bureau on Wednesday confirmed that 152 Vietnamese tourists were reported missing after they entered the nation through Kaohsiung on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ “Kuan Hung Pilot Project” — an electronic visa program designed to increase visits from quality tour groups from India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos.
The question then is: How can the tourism industry attract more individual travelers, particularly those who will become repeat visitors and act as ambassadors for the “Taiwan” brand? Various responses on Web site Quora to the question “What qualities make a destination attractive to you as a tourist?” indicate that travelers want to see something in a destination that can only be seen in that place.
“Every place has it’s own charm, culture and cuisine, so if a place is offering me an opportunity to experience something I haven’t done before, I would love to go there,” one user wrote.
Another said that when traveling they want to “do something that I can’t do at my home location, eg, riding a camel through the desert in Morocco.”
Taiwanese often tout the nation’s night markets, but even Taipei has much more to offer, such as historical areas like Dihua Street, Dadaocheng (大稻埕) and Mengjia (艋舺); its many temples; and hot springs.
Outside Taipei there are the unique experiences of walking through tea plantations in Alishan (阿里山); cycling through Taroko Gorge (太魯閣峽谷) and picturesque Chihshang Township (池上) in Taitung County; and visiting historical military outposts in Kinmen and Matsu.
The government has promoted these places in its marketing aimed at China, but it has not done nearly as good a job in its marketing elsewhere.
The head of the Taiwan Tourism Bureau in New York in May apologized for content on social media that included misspelled words and grammatical errors in English; its promotion of things like “dirty bread” (髒髒包) and Kavalan whiskey — which one blogger said is “not a reason for somebody to buy a plane ticket to Taiwan”; and its marketing of Jiufen (九份) as inspired by the Japanese animation Spirited Away, which is inaccurate.
Taiwan has much to offer travelers, but there are still misconceptions in the nation about what tourists want. Rather than seeking to attract international theme park brands, such as Disney or Universal Studios — as suggested by Kao Ming-tu (高洺塗), convener of the Travel Agent Association’s policy development committee — Taiwan should look to promote what it already has that makes it unique.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers