One year after the Political Parties Act (政黨法) came into being, 90 percent of registered parties have ceased operations. As the number of political parties shrank, some people established the conservative Christian Formosa Republican Association.
Stephen Yates, a US politician concerned with Taiwan’s democracy, denied in a Facebook post on Dec. 10 that he was involved with organizing the group, saying: “I am neither a member nor a cofounder of” the association.
However, “for many years, I have noted to friends that American conservatives lack a natural partner in Taiwan for collaboration on policy and commentary... In that spirit, I have often encouraged friends to consider organizing outside of the political process in a way that would facilitate policy analysis and advocacy based on common principles and values,” he said.
Although the association is a minor group, the phenomenon is significant to Taiwan. The association considers Taiwan a conservative society, but no political party represents that ideology. Its members think that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is left-wing and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is a Leninist party, while government transitions have been merely an illusion.
However, the KMT was a complex right-wing and Leninist party under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), but followed a socialist path under former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). The DPP promoted social policies while in opposition, but after taking power, it quickly befriended big business.
Taiwan’s two major parties have no fixed values and can shift from right to left-wing and back again when they see fit.
The values of the conservatives are based on Protestant ethics: Morals override politics; people should be responsible for themselves and solve their own problems first and only then seek help from family, the community and the government in that order; fundamental human rights are God-given, but people have the choice to strive upward or fall. Conservatives thus advocate limited government, and oppose socialism and communism.
It sounds logical, but the association is naive in raising the idea of “rule by entrepreneurs,” which is fraught with problems. East Asian entrepreneurs, Chinese in particular, rarely introduce new technologies and models to increase profit and then share the profit with their employees. Instead, they tend to increase profit by cutting salaries and reducing expenditure, and then invest in real estate.
They are selfish believers in mercantilism, without the slightest sense of charity or humbleness. Someone who wants to promote “rule by entrepreneurs” should first ask themselves if they are mentally prepared for the consequences. The answer should be no and that is when conservatives need the balance of some left-wing naive idealism and reform fervor.
The long-term debate and competition of values between the left and the right has achieved spectacular accomplishments: democracy, human rights and environment protection.
The coming impact of artificial intelligence is likely to force people into a true left-right standoff. For example, the popular basic income theory could be interpreted as a left-wing social security measure, but it triggers an economic cycle favored by the right. However, capitalists oppose the idea without considering the devastating results to a stagnating economy.
Taiwan’s democracy movement has always been led by lawyers and political scientists. Three presidents over the past two decades went through law school. This makes them rigid and they tend to pay attention to detail. Now might be the time to elect a president from another field.
There will hopefully be a real policy debate between the left and right. This would be the only way to move beyond the trap set by the blue, green and white camps. The white faction’s objective to overtake the blue and the green camps is but an illusion, seemingly devoid of values and a philosophy. They are just another set of opportunists.
HoonTing is a political commentator.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS