Financial digitalization — the digital revolution’s system-level transformation of the entire financial ecosystem — could catalyze global efforts to finance sustainable development.
According to the McKinsey Global Institute, the expanded use of financial technology (fintech) could drive growth across developing countries by up to US$3.7 trillion by 2025, thanks mainly to increased productivity gains and broader financial inclusion.
However, if the promises of digitalization are to be fulfilled, the world will need to align financing and investment strategies more tightly to sustainable development outcomes.
Last month, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres convened a task force on digital financing to tackle this complex challenge. We are honored to serve as cochairs for this global effort.
For obvious reasons, financing is key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and meeting the emissions targets set by the 2015 Paris Agreement.
However, although global savings are more than adequate to fuel the transition to sustainable development, the global financial system has so far failed to effectively intermediate supply and demand. The modest success that some countries have achieved in financing sustainable development has not been commensurate with the need.
Many factors can influence sustainable development outcomes. For example, the global financial and economic crises that began in 2008 — and the subsequent responses by regulators and policymakers — have impacted economic growth, job creation and income equality.
Likewise, ventures such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative can unlock fresh funds for infrastructure investment. Any number of national and international policies can determine whether financing delivers, or diverts us from, sustainable development.
However, it is digitalization that could make the biggest long-term difference by harnessing the power of new business models driven by technologies, including mobile connectivity, artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain and the Internet of Things.
However, that immense potential is not guaranteed. Ultimately, the impact of digitalization on sustainable development will depend on whether the advent of more and cheaper data, together with faster analytics, results in financing decisions that take greater account of today’s social and environmental costs.
Fintech can place citizens center stage in delivering good development outcomes.
Kenya’s digital revolution has helped poor households gain access to everything from solar energy to government bond markets. Crowdfunding platforms such as the UK’s Abundance, Germany’s EcoCrowd and Japan’s NPO Bank are unlocking responsible, sustainable lending solutions. In China, Ant Financial’s Ant Forest platform has helped more than 300 million people reduce their ecological footprint. Bicycle-sharing services use app-based fintech payment solutions to make their low-carbon, healthier transportation option available to millions of people in cities all over the world.
In short, there are already tantalizing hints of the power of the digital revolution in advancing finance for sustainability.
Changing how people bank and invest, and democratizing access to the financial system is essential to spurring development more broadly.
According to the UN Capital Development Fund, financial inclusion for the unbanked and underserved is a direct enabler for at least eight of the SDGs.
The challenge is to think and act systemically: to extrapolate from retail-level examples to consider how digitalization can align the financial system to sustainable development; how investors identify, analyze and mitigate risk; how capital markets move; and how policymakers and regulators approach their work.
The problem is that most solutions are fragmented and narrowly focused, while issues that pose an existential threat to humanity — such as climate change — are largely external to most financing decisions.
Domestic savings are not being channeled to fund sustainable infrastructure. Illicit financial flows continue to drain development resources. Sustainable financing for biodiversity remains virtually ignored by the fintech revolution, and even financial inclusion — where fintech has had the biggest development impact to date — has a long way to go in reducing poverty and inequality.
These are just a few of the challenges our task force will study. Our membership includes tech entrepreneurs, bank CEOs, civil society leaders, international standard-setters, capital markets experts, central bank governors, finance and economic ministers, and heads of UN agencies.
Throughout next year, we will work closely with established and emerging leaders to analyze the issues, identify opportunities and make recommendations to ensure that the transformations being wrought by financial digitalization will be ones that ultimately benefit the planet and its people.
We begin our work next month and aim to present our initial set of findings in September.
As Guterres said last month when he announced the launch of the task force, digital technology “can be a game changer” in delivering progress on the SDGs.
With leadership and policy guidance, the digitalization of financing can open up roles for empowered citizens to shape the future of the real economy. The focus must be on seizing this disruptive opportunity to ensure that the finance system fulfills its potential to support inclusive, sustainable development.
Maria Ramos is CEO of Absa Group Ltd. Achim Steiner is administrator of the UN Development Programme.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused