Russian President Vladimir Putin never thought he would have a problem with the nation’s youth culture. He has always been so confident of his popularity that he felt no need to repeat the mistakes of his Soviet predecessors, who tried to control the pop-music underground and banned it when they could not, but as the whole nation is losing patience with the system Putin has built, Russian rappers are now flipping off the state.
The Russian hip-hop world had been reeling this year from a wave of cancelations of concerts across the nation of acts that bureaucrats and police deemed to be immoral or otherwise extreme.
The resulting popular backlash, including a well-attended concert in Moscow to protest the detention of a rapper known as Husky and an abortive hearing in parliament, set off alarm bells among Putin’s advisers; Putin himself this week demanded to know why the shows were being shut down. Now he is trying to get a grip on a situation that emerged from the growing alienation of the Russian people from their government.
Illustration: Mountain People
The lessons of Soviet censorship could not have been clearer for Putin. He comes from St Petersburg, which in the 1970s and 1980s was home to the nation’s most powerful rock bands. Their music did as much as any politician to bring down the Soviet Union, and some musicians from that era have kept playing and have remained critical of the government.
In 2010, Putin had a much-publicized confrontation with one of them, Yuri Shevchuk of the band DDT, who told the Russian strongman that Russia was not a free country under his leadership.
However, the new generation of Russians does not listen to bands like Shevchuk’s. It listens to rap and for quite a while the Russian rap culture seemed compatible with the regime. In 2009, Putin went on the Muz TV channel to hand out awards in a youth culture contest named “Battle for Respect.”
Looking rather out of place in a sweater and jacket, he started off by saying that the art forms being honored — rap, graffiti and break dancing, were not of Russian origin, but should nevertheless be appreciated.
“In my view, any phenomenon, regardless of its country of origin and name, always deserves the support off both society and the state if there are two components: first, brilliant form, and second, constructive content,” he said.
Much of Russian rap in those days fit that definition. Timur Yunusov, aka Timati, the nation’s biggest hip-hop star (Snoop Dogg even appeared in one of his videos), was a Putin loyalist, and Roman Chumakov, aka Zhigan, the ex-convict who received the Battle for Respect award, pushed a brand of Russian patriotism that was to the national leader’s liking.
“I was a fool,” he rapped in 2013. “When I wanted to go away. I was a madman and no one could help me. I thought life would be sweeter over there and thought that crappy dollar could save everything. But I was wrong, how blind I was, man, when I ignored what was mine and tried to be different.”
For that kind of attitude, Putin, a former street kid himself, could tolerate a bit of petty criminality, macho posturing and fleeting references to drugs.
Even relatively recently, the Russian rap culture was not Putin-unfriendly. Last year, Vyacheslav Mashnov, aka Gnoiny or Slava KPSS, who has declared himself the Vladimir Putin of Russian rap (for the president’s macho qualities as well as his rejection of foreign influences), beat Oxford-educated and opposition-sympathizing Miron Fyodorov, aka Oxxxymiron, in an epic rap battle watched by more than 38 million people.
Many older Russians, for whom the battle was a revelation, were astonished by the rappers’ ability to reference Boris Pasternak and Aldous Huxley, as much as by the verbal violence they unleashed at each other. Gnoiny was even forgiven for the anti-Semitic hints he dropped (Oxxxymiron is Jewish). It looked as though Russia’s great poetic tradition was coming alive again — so what if some if its bearers respected Putin
However, living in Putin’s Russia, especially in its still desperately poor heartland, is no party. Even many of the more successful rappers are unable to break away from their roots and would lose their audience if they did. In 2014, Zhigan went to jail again for a year — for robbery, though he claimed that the victim, a producer, had owed him money.
He rapped his last word, saying he could not have gone to the authorities to get the debt back: “I am who I am.”
Last week, he and David Nuriev, aka Ptakha, were invited to the Russian parliament for a hearing about the concert cancelations, which had affected fellow rappers Egor Kreed, Husky, Allj and two pop groups, IC3PEAK and Friendzone. Ptakha, like Zhigan, was no opposition icon.
Last year, he recorded a popular video mocking the supporters of anti-corruption activist and Putin opponent Alexey Navalny: “Rich kids climbing street lamps, you’re the nation’s hope.”
Yet here Zhigan and Ptakha both were at the parliament, trying to explain to legislators and a hostile police official representing the Russian Ministry of the Interior that if rap songs mentioned drugs or violence, it was not their fault, it was Russian reality.
“Do you think you can help preserve morality” by banning concerts, Ptakha asked incredulously, “when every dog knows where to score dope ”
It did not work. After one of the legislators suggested that rappers complain to parliament when concerts get canceled, Zhigan apparently recalled his last word in court.
“This is a pointless conversation,” he told Ptakha before rising and walking out.
This was not about politics, just about an unbridgeable divide between the rappers and the audience on the one hand, and the state on the other.
Dmitry Kuznetsov, aka Husky, who was involved in the most notorious cancelation episode last month, did not suffer for agitating against Putin; in fact, he is known for playing in the unrecognized, Russian-backed Donetsk People Republic in eastern Ukraine and even recording a song about one of the “republic’s” fallen field commanders.
Rather, the problem was with Husky’s lyrics that police and various other public morality guardians consider extreme. His recent video, Judas, blocked on YouTube in Russia at the authorities’ request, but seen by more than 5 million people, shows him buying and using drugs.
“Which of you will give me up,” Husky raps, “before my blunt goes cold ”
The other affected rappers ostensibly have been stopped from playing in various Russian cities for similar reasons — after calls and letters to the authorities from concerned parents and morality activists.
When Husky was barred from playing at a club in the southern city of Krasnodar, he jumped on top of a car (he would later say that he thought its owner had encouraged him to do it) and started rapping.
“I will sing my music, hey, the most honest music, hey,” he intoned as hundreds of fans went wild, but police pulled Husky off the vehicle and he was sentenced to 12 days in prison.
By the time a court in Krasnodar lifted the sentence four days later, Oxxxymiron and two other rappers, the strongly anti-Putin Ivan Alexeyev, aka Noize MC, and Vasily Vakulenko, banned from Ukraine for playing concerts in annexed Crimea, had organized a concert in his support at one of Moscow’s biggest clubs.
“Darkness, debasement, drugs, guns are part of the modern world,” Oxxxymiron told the capacity crowd of about 3,000. “It’s not we, rappers, artists, who invent and spread them. Very different people do it. When one hears rap is to blame, no, it’s just a reflection, not the root cause.”
It is a short step from quarreling with the morality police to writing anti-government raps. This year, Ivan Dryomin, aka Face, previously not known for politicized lyrics, unexpectedly released a transparently political album.
“Since my birth, there has been no freedom in this country,” he rapped. “Here, bought judges ruin people’s lives, World Cups are just a reason to skim off cash, but nobody gives a **** among the gray apartment blocks.”
In October, the rapper canceled the tour he had planned to promote the album without a public explanation. If he had tried to go ahead, it is likely that the authorities would have treated him much as they reacted to IC3PEAK, which has had concerts canceled in multiple cities.
The group’s recent video shows the singer, Anastasia Kreslina, pretending to pour kerosene all over herself against the background of the Russian government building in Moscow.
“All of Russia is looking at me,” she sings. “Let everything burn, let everything burn.”
More such songs are definitely not what the Kremlin wants from a culture it has spent some effort to keep from turning hostile.
Sergey Kiriyenko, Putin’s deputy chief of staff in charge of domestic politics, last week told a conference of the ruling United Russia party that it would be “dumb” to ban concerts instead of “working” with young people and their culture.
Putin’s chief domestic propagandist, Dmitry Kiselyov, also took the rappers’ side in a recent edition of his weekly show on state TV.
“Rappers are like cats who walk by themselves,” he said, channeling Rudyard Kipling. “Organizing them into a herd is no simple task. At the very least, they shouldn’t be harassed.”
That attitude explains Putin’s orders on Tuesday last week to account for the concert cancelations. His interest in the matter is likely to cool down the morality defenders and let the rappers make a living for awhile.
However, it is not going to do much about the reality that feeds their poetry. Putting two and two together, as Face has done, is probably inevitable both for the artists and their mostly teenage audience. All Putin can hope to do is slow it down a little.
Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics and business. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion Web site Slon.ru.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US