There are TV stations, reporters and staff who are doing a good job with election coverage, but viewer ratings for coverage of the nine-in-one elections were a huge blow for them. Channels that reported on candidates in an uneven manner had more viewers than channels with more balanced reporting.
During ballot counting after the Nov. 24 vote, news channels that updated vote counts earlier received much higher viewer ratings than channels that required the numbers to be verified before they were reported.
Viewer ratings represent advertising income, which is a matter of life and death for commercial TV stations. Consequently, journalists who take their job seriously often struggle with viewer ratings, while their competitors — who pay scant attention to professionalism — get much higher ratings.
With “bad money driving out good,” what is the National Communications Commission (NCC) doing with its authority to censure stations that diseminate misinformation and fake news?
Taiwan’s ballot-counting process is quite wondrous. For hours, viewers who care about election outcomes are fixated on ever-changing and difficult-to-verify vote counts on TV, their mood fluctuating with the fortunes of the candidates they support. It is an open secret that with the exception of Public Television Service (PTS), whose operations do not rely on commercial income, news stations have been “inflating” vote numbers in live broadcasts of vote-counting in the scramble for higher viewer ratings.
During the 2004 presidential election, a scandal broke when news stations trying to outdo each other with inflated vote numbers to the extent that their numbers exceeded the final tally. Following public criticism, stations pledged to exert self-discipline. Some self-restraint was apparent during the 2008 presidential election, but by 2012, they were back at it again.
It seems that no one can stop TV stations from inflating numbers as long as they do it “discreetly” — not inflating them “too much.”
However, coverage of the vote-counting process should be truthful. Reports on ballot numbers should follow verified counts, not the manipulation of news station managers, who become directors catering to viewers’ state of mind and targeting ratings. Reporting vote counts is not a soap opera, but it seems to follows similar logic.
Inflated figures during the 2004 presidential election brought post-election political and social turmoil, because supporters of the pan-blue camp doubted the official results after having watched the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket of Lien Chan (連戰) and James Soong (宋楚瑜) hold a fabricated lead for several hours. In pursuit of advertising income, which seems to be a trivial consideration compared with democracy for such TV stations, they harmed the nation and allowed news coverage — a public good — to become public enemy No. 1.
Social progress is always slower than people expect, because preventing regression and setbacks requires great effort. TV news is closely connected to the quality of democracy, but stations performed poorly in their coverage of last month’s elections, which is a warning of a coming setback. This must be addressed head-on to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy.
With commercial television stations in the mainstream, allowing rule-breakers to profit is tantamount to suppressing and eliminating those who stick to journalistic professionalism, just as turning a blind eye to tax dodgers is tantamount to punishing tax payers.
As market regulator, the NCC should quickly intervene and raise the cost of breaking the law before the media outlets that are still willing to comply with journalistic ethics — sticking to the principle of accuracy and balanced coverage — are forced to throw in the towel. Otherwise, a vicious circle will emerge in which the good ones are eliminated.
If that happens the downfall of professional journalism will bring down the nation’s hard-earned democracy, which was fought for over decades.
Article 27 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法) stipulates that if a broadcasting business involved in producing and broadcasting news violates the principle of fact verification and hurts the public interest, the NCC can, after receiving a report from the industry’s self-regulatory mechanism, impose a fine. In the past, the NCC did not fine violators out of respect for freedom of expression.
If the premise is the protection of the freedom of expression, then surely the NCC has no excuse to remain idle with the situation today in which journalists who try hard to present truthful and balanced information are deprived of their freedom of expression.
Eve Chiu is a board member of the Campaign for Media Reform.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95