Brazilian resident Luan Dartora Taniuti settled in the remote municipality of Akitakata in southwest Japan when he was nine. Leonel Maia, from East Timor, has been there nearly seven years. Philippine resident Gladys Gayeta is a newly arrived trainee factory worker, but must leave in less than three years.
Japan’s strict immigration laws mean that Taniuti, who has Japanese ancestry, and Maia, who is married to a Japanese, are among the relatively few foreigners whom the country allows to stay for the long term.
The upper house of the Japanese Diet on Saturday passed a bill that allows more foreign blue-collar workers such as Gayeta to immigrate for limited periods.
However, Akitakata Mayor Kazuyoshi Hamada, said that his shrinking community, like others in Japan, needs foreigners of all backgrounds to stay.
The rural city has more than 600 non-Japanese, or about 2 percent of its population, which has shrunk more than 10 percent since its incorporation in 2004.
“Given the low birth rate and aging population, when you consider who can support the elderly and the factories ... we need foreigners,” said Hamada, 74, who in March unveiled a plan that explicitly seeks them as long-term residents. “I want them to expand the immigration law and create a system where anyone can come to the country.”
Japan’s population decline is well-known, but the problem is especially acute in remote, rural locales such as Akitakata.
Hamada’s proposal to attract foreigners as teijusha, or long-term residents, is the first of its kind in immigration-shy Japan.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pitched his bill as a way to address Japan’s acute labor shortage, but has denied that it is an “immigration policy.”
“Hamada openly mentioned Japanese immigration policy and that is very courageous,” said Toshihiro Menju, managing director of the Japan Center for International Exchange in Tokyo, a think tank. “Akitakata is kind of a forerunner.”
The population of Akitakata, formed from the merger of six small townships, dropped to 28,910 last month from 30,983 in 2014. About 40 percent of residents are 65 or older.
Car parts factories and farms are crying out for workers, many houses stand empty, darkened streets are deserted by early evening and the aisles of a discount supermarket are mostly empty by 8pm.
Hamada said that long-term resident foreigners are the solution.
However, integrating them will be crucial — and many cities were unprepared for earlier influxes of foreign workers, experts said.
Blue-collar foreign workers have typically arrived via three legal avenues: long-term visas begun in the 1990s for the mostly Latin American descendants of ethnic Japanese; a “technical trainees program” often criticized as an exploitative backdoor to unskilled labor; and foreign students allowed to work up to 28 hours a week.
The country had 2.5 million foreign residents as of January, up 7.5 percent from a year earlier and about 2 percent of the total population. The number of native Japanese dropped 0.3 percent to 125.2 million in the same period, the ninth straight annual decline.
Akitakata’s foreign population is about two-thirds trainees from such places as China, Vietnam, Thailand and the Philippines. Most are only allowed to stay for up to three years.
The rest are long-term residents, such as Maia, and Brazilians like Taniuti who stayed even after the global financial crisis prompted the central government to offer one-way tickets to his native country.
“When I feared having no job, I thought ‘It’s enough if I can eat,’” said Taniuti, who five years later set up his own company, where his two brothers and father now work.
Akitakata residents are divided on whether to attract more foreigners, but less wary than in the past.
A survey conducted last year showed that 48 percent of Akitakata residents thought it was “good” to have foreigners live in the city, up from 30.8 percent in 2010.
That was similar to the 45 percent nationally who backed Abe’s planned reforms in a poll by the Asahi Shimbun last month.
“I think our lives would be enriched with different cultures, but Japanese are not skilled at communication and language is the biggest barrier,” said Yuko Okita, 64, who works at her husband’s local taxi service.
Maia, 33, said that he got along well with local residents — he is a member of a volunteer firefighter brigade — but that his half-Japanese daughter had been bullied at school.
A media report that Hamada set a numerical target for an increase in foreign residents, which the mayor called “misleading,” sparked a protest by a right-wing group from nearby Hiroshima.
Akitakata might also have a hard time attracting new residents of any nationality, simply because it is remote and small.
“Akitakata is slow-paced. It’s not attractive for young people. But it’s a great place to raise kids,” said Taniuti, a father of two.
Gayeta, 22, a trainee at a car parts factory, said that there is little to do in Akitakata after work.
“There is no place to go, just yama [mountains],” she said, mixing English and Japanese.
To be sure, little has changed in Akitakata since Hamada announced his plan.
The city has an office where a Brazilian resident offers advice in Portuguese.
Proponents want to improve Japanese courses for foreigners and are considering how to use abandoned homes to house them.
Abe’s immigration bill, which is to take effect in April, allows 345,150 blue-collar workers to enter Japan over five years in sectors like construction that are suffering from serious labor shortages.
Opponents have said that the new law was hasty and ill-conceived.
The law creates two new categories of visas for blue-collar workers: one for those who could stay up to five years, but could not bring family members; and another for more highly skilled foreigners who could bring families and might eventually be eligible for residency.
Details are not spelled out in the law.
However, the path to permanent residence is steep: One standard requirement is to live in Japan for 10 consecutive years, with exceptions for the highly skilled professionals whom Japan is eager to attract.
“The truth of the matter is the central government is not basing acceptance of foreign workers on the premise of long-term residence,” said Meiji University professor Keizo Yamawaki, who helped Akitakata draft its plan.
Additional reporting by staff writer
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers