For Europe’s sake, French President Emmanuel Macron needs help — not our scorn or hatred. A young, reformist French head of state who promised a “European renaissance” finds himself struggling at the helm of a country that is fast becoming the “sick man of Europe” again.
It was a telling moment last weekend when rioters disfigured the face of a statue of Marianne, the French republic’s symbol, at the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. Just three weeks earlier, world leaders had gathered there with Macron for the centenary of the armistice that ended World War I.
If the “sad passions” that Macron has warned of many times take hold in France, an entire continent will be affected — not just one man’s political career.
Extreme forces across Europe are busily rejoicing over Macron’s “yellow vests” predicament. From Britain’s hardline Brexiteers — both left and right — to far-right Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, not to mention Russian President Vladimir Putin’s propaganda outlets, the relish is unmistakable. Upheaval and chaos in liberal democracies is what they thrive on.
The prize the extremists seek is a political takeover of Europe in May’s European Parliament elections. Events in France are ominous and their significance extends far beyond one country’s borders.
Not long ago, Macron proudly branded himself as the archenemy of Salvini and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, two leaders whose trademark policies target migrants, political opponents and the rule of law.
Macron is weakened, on the defensive and ever more isolated.
Scenes in France over the past two weeks could seem to some like a revival of the May 1968 uprising, but a more pertinent parallel might be Feb. 6, 1934. That day, gangs of far-right nationalists marched on the French capital and clashed with the police in violence that left 15 dead. The events of the day served as a founding myth for that generation of France’s far right.
Macron has certainly made mistakes. Most of the protesters have genuine, if chaotically expressed, grievances. They consider themselves the “invisible” people, treated with contempt by Parisian elites, and now they have made themselves very visible with their fluorescent vests.
Public opinion is behind them.
One of their most eloquent members is Ingrid Levavasseur, a young nurse and single mother of two from Normandy. Last week she spoke movingly on TV of her struggle to make ends meet and of her sense of deep injustice.
“Some people complain that we block roads, but they don’t complain when they’re stuck in traffic jams on their way to ski resorts, do they?” she asked softly.
However, the French crisis has more sinister undercurrents, embodied by another “yellow vests” spokesperson, Christophe Chalencon.
A blacksmith from the southern Vaucluse region, Chalencon is openly anti-Muslim and has called for a military-led government to be installed, “because a true commander, a general, a strong hand is what we need.”
Meanwhile, far-right outfits such as Action Francaise are trying to make a comeback.
Tuesday’s announcement that tax rises would be suspended was probably too little, too late. French anxieties are threefold: There is the fear of losing power and prestige; the fear of the economic consequences of globalization and the fear of losing a “national identity.”
The country also suffers from deep domestic fault lines, which one president alone could hardly heal in just 18 months.
Entire social groups feel pitted against one another: young versus old, unemployed versus employed, rural versus urban and unqualified versus educated. Such divisions exist in many countries, but in France they take on an existential dimension because of the ideal of egalitarianism historically associated with the republic.
Many French people feel that reality does not reflect what they are entitled to have.
When Macron ran for office last year, he promised a “revolution” — it was even the title of his campaign book — to address a widespread need for domestic renewal and a rebooting of French prestige, not least on the European stage.
Now Macron looks paralyzed at home and the last rites could soon be read over his European plans. Just as a weakened German Chancellor Angela Merkel did not do much to help Macron relaunch the European project, a weakened Macron could now provide new fodder for extremists and populists across the continent.
The Le Pens, Orbans and Salvinis are waiting in the wings. If we do not find solutions, the EU election in France risks becoming a referendum against Macron.
So the gloss has come off the French president as a champion for liberals and pro-Europeans., but to see that as good news for Europe and democracy at large is mind-bogglingly dangerous. It is like wishing for a train crash so that some carriages can be replaced.
Social pains in France are real and must be addressed, but the forces that stand to gain from collective wreckage and street violence are those that will push us into an abyss.
Look at the death threats made to the “yellow vests” who said that they were ready to negotiate with the government.
A few years ago, an exhausted, tense Italy had its “vaffanculo days” of protests — the message being: “fuck you” to the establishment — from which the populist Five Star Movement grew its strength.
What has happened since? This year, Italy has fallen into the grip of the far right.
France’s “vaffanculo days” will lead to a similar scenario if sober-minded people do not somehow help Macron to rebuild a minimum of trust.
There can be no European democratic project or social justice without a European democratic France. Marianne’s face must be restored.
Natalie Nougayrede is a Guardian columnist.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers