Just months after a stunning election victory, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has had to step in to mollify the nation’s majority Malay Muslims, underlining a weighty challenge confronting his multiethnic, reformist coalition: race.
When riots erupted at a Hindu temple outside Kuala Lumpur last week, 93-year-old Mahathir spared no effort to scotch speculation that tensions with Malays were to blame.
Just a few days earlier, his government reversed its pledge to ratify a UN convention against racial discrimination following a backlash from groups that said that it would dilute privileges Malays have enjoyed for decades.
The two incidents illustrate the predicament confronting Mahathir as euphoria over the May election fades: curbing racial divisions, carrying out reform and reassuring Malays that affirmative-action policies favoring them in business, education and housing are not about to disappear.
Mahathir’s unlikely alliance — known as Pakatan Harapan, or Pact of Hope — has to do that without upsetting the delicate balance of its constituent parties.
“The problem with Pakatan Harapan as a multiracial coalition is that it is not seen as championing the Malays,” said a deputy minister, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Opposition parties are successfully fanning a perception that Malays, about 60 percent of the country’s 32 million people, are being abandoned in what some have called “New Malaysia,” he said.
Malaysia’s ethnic Chinese are estimated at 23 percent, while mostly Hindu ethnic Indians comprise about 7 percent, government data showed.
Mahathir ousted the long-ruling coalition led by the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), which has pushed positive discrimination for Malays to avoid a repeat of bloody Chinese-Malay riots in 1969.
Mahathir was prime minister for two decades at the head of UMNO, before he fell out with his successors.
In the May election, Mahathir’s coalition won overwhelming support from ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities, but it secured the votes of only 30 percent of Malay voters, according to estimates by independent polling firm Merdeka Center.
About 40 percent of Malays backed the beleaguered government of former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak, an UMNO grandee who is now facing multiple graft charges, and the rest voted for Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), a conservative Islamic party.
A Merdeka poll in August showed that concerns over ethnic issues and religious rights had grown since the election, with about 21 percent citing those issues as a concern compared with 12 percent in April.
For many Malays, the ouster of Najib over a multi-billion-US-dollar corruption scandal that had swirled for years around the 1Malaysia Development Berhad sovereign wealth fund was fair enough.
However, some have been dismayed by moves made by the government of Mahathir — himself once a champion of the Malay bumiputera, or “sons of the soil” policy — such as the appointment of non-Malays as minister of finance and attorney general.
A lawmaker in the ruling coalition said the initial plan to ratify the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination fed a narrative pushed by UMNO and PAS that the government is out of touch with the Malay community, especially the working class.
“The Malays are more focused on socioeconomic issues, and if you don’t focus on their poverty and hardships, obviously they’ll get worked up,” said the lawmaker, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
The coalition is struggling to convince Malays that its policies will benefit them and protect Islamic values, Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department for Religious Affairs Mujahid Yusof Rawa said.
“We have had some success in reaching out to them, but if we fail to build on that, it will affect support from Malay voters,” he said.
Mahathir, who was prime minister from 1981 to 2003 and is now the oldest elected leader in the world, remains a sharp political operator: Many expect he will take steps to shore up Malay support for his government.
It was Mahathir who snuffed out controversy over the UN treaty by dropping it and amid the Hindu temple unrest he promised action to keep the peace, acknowledging that “such incidents ... can lead to bigger problems involving racial harmony.”
His administration has also refused to deport Indian cleric Zakir Naik, who is popular among conservative Malay Muslims, but is being investigated by Indian authorities for alleged hate speech.
Naik last week began a five-day speaking tour in a northern state.
However, steps that pander to Malays could create rifts within Mahathir’s alliance, which includes the Chinese-led Democratic Action Party and the pro-reform party of former Malaysian deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim.
There is an understanding that Mahathir is to eventually hand power to Anwar, but the two men have fallen out before.
“As things currently stand, the Malay opposition are saying the government is being dominated by the Democratic Action Party and weak on Malay interests, and that it is delivering far less than promised,” said Ibrahim Suffian, director of pollster Merdeka. “The danger is that if they try to please one crowd, they push away the other.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US