Just months after a stunning election victory, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has had to step in to mollify the nation’s majority Malay Muslims, underlining a weighty challenge confronting his multiethnic, reformist coalition: race.
When riots erupted at a Hindu temple outside Kuala Lumpur last week, 93-year-old Mahathir spared no effort to scotch speculation that tensions with Malays were to blame.
Just a few days earlier, his government reversed its pledge to ratify a UN convention against racial discrimination following a backlash from groups that said that it would dilute privileges Malays have enjoyed for decades.
The two incidents illustrate the predicament confronting Mahathir as euphoria over the May election fades: curbing racial divisions, carrying out reform and reassuring Malays that affirmative-action policies favoring them in business, education and housing are not about to disappear.
Mahathir’s unlikely alliance — known as Pakatan Harapan, or Pact of Hope — has to do that without upsetting the delicate balance of its constituent parties.
“The problem with Pakatan Harapan as a multiracial coalition is that it is not seen as championing the Malays,” said a deputy minister, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Opposition parties are successfully fanning a perception that Malays, about 60 percent of the country’s 32 million people, are being abandoned in what some have called “New Malaysia,” he said.
Malaysia’s ethnic Chinese are estimated at 23 percent, while mostly Hindu ethnic Indians comprise about 7 percent, government data showed.
Mahathir ousted the long-ruling coalition led by the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), which has pushed positive discrimination for Malays to avoid a repeat of bloody Chinese-Malay riots in 1969.
Mahathir was prime minister for two decades at the head of UMNO, before he fell out with his successors.
In the May election, Mahathir’s coalition won overwhelming support from ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities, but it secured the votes of only 30 percent of Malay voters, according to estimates by independent polling firm Merdeka Center.
About 40 percent of Malays backed the beleaguered government of former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak, an UMNO grandee who is now facing multiple graft charges, and the rest voted for Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), a conservative Islamic party.
A Merdeka poll in August showed that concerns over ethnic issues and religious rights had grown since the election, with about 21 percent citing those issues as a concern compared with 12 percent in April.
For many Malays, the ouster of Najib over a multi-billion-US-dollar corruption scandal that had swirled for years around the 1Malaysia Development Berhad sovereign wealth fund was fair enough.
However, some have been dismayed by moves made by the government of Mahathir — himself once a champion of the Malay bumiputera, or “sons of the soil” policy — such as the appointment of non-Malays as minister of finance and attorney general.
A lawmaker in the ruling coalition said the initial plan to ratify the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination fed a narrative pushed by UMNO and PAS that the government is out of touch with the Malay community, especially the working class.
“The Malays are more focused on socioeconomic issues, and if you don’t focus on their poverty and hardships, obviously they’ll get worked up,” said the lawmaker, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
The coalition is struggling to convince Malays that its policies will benefit them and protect Islamic values, Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department for Religious Affairs Mujahid Yusof Rawa said.
“We have had some success in reaching out to them, but if we fail to build on that, it will affect support from Malay voters,” he said.
Mahathir, who was prime minister from 1981 to 2003 and is now the oldest elected leader in the world, remains a sharp political operator: Many expect he will take steps to shore up Malay support for his government.
It was Mahathir who snuffed out controversy over the UN treaty by dropping it and amid the Hindu temple unrest he promised action to keep the peace, acknowledging that “such incidents ... can lead to bigger problems involving racial harmony.”
His administration has also refused to deport Indian cleric Zakir Naik, who is popular among conservative Malay Muslims, but is being investigated by Indian authorities for alleged hate speech.
Naik last week began a five-day speaking tour in a northern state.
However, steps that pander to Malays could create rifts within Mahathir’s alliance, which includes the Chinese-led Democratic Action Party and the pro-reform party of former Malaysian deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim.
There is an understanding that Mahathir is to eventually hand power to Anwar, but the two men have fallen out before.
“As things currently stand, the Malay opposition are saying the government is being dominated by the Democratic Action Party and weak on Malay interests, and that it is delivering far less than promised,” said Ibrahim Suffian, director of pollster Merdeka. “The danger is that if they try to please one crowd, they push away the other.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers