The East Asia Summit (EAS) on Nov. 14 and 15 was held against the backdrop of a deplorable security and economic situation in Asia and the world. The summit, chaired by Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍), was attended by the heads of all 10 ASEAN members and eight other countries.
The leaders extensively discussed several issues of regional importance, including broad strategic, political and economic issues, with the aim of promoting peace, stability and economic prosperity in the region.
In doing so, Loong said: “We reaffirmed ASEAN’s central role in the EAS, and ASEAN’s commitment to work in close partnership with all EAS participating countries to ensure the EAS would continue to be an integral component of the evolving regional architecture through ASEAN-led processes.”
The leaders expressed their commitment to strengthening regional cooperation to address security issues, including safety and security of nuclear and other radioactive materials in accordance with national and international obligations.
The meeting also highlighted that cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region should embrace key principles, such as ASEAN centrality, openness, transparency, inclusivity and a rules-based approach to enhance mutual trust, respect and benefits.
On the issue of the South China Sea, the member countries “reaffirmed the importance of maintaining and promoting peace, security, stability, safety and freedom of navigation in and overflight above the South China Sea, and recognized the benefits of having the South China Sea as a sea of peace, stability and prosperity,” and underscored the importance of the full and effective implementation of the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.
This bold statement clearly reflected the growing concerns of the countries about China’s aggressive efforts to institutionalize its claim over the sea by building artificial islands and obstructing free movement.
With this in mind, the EAS has focused on promoting maritime cooperation as a new area of cooperation under the Manila Plan of Action, which includes practical and comprehensive action lines to promote this area of cooperation.
The member countries also supported further strengthening maritime cooperation among EAS-participating countries in a collective and holistic manner through ASEAN-led mechanisms, such as the ASEAN Regional Forum and the ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting-Plus, in line with the 2015 EAS Statement on Enhancing Regional Maritime Cooperation.
At a time when terrorism has emerged as one of the most deadly global security issues, leaders at the EAS condemned attacks that had caused significant loss of life, and discussed the need for countries to support “a sustained and comprehensive approach involving the active participation and collaboration of all states ... and international and regional organizations to impede, impair, isolate and incapacitate the terrorist threat.”
This move will strengthen the voices arguing for stringent action against countries that support terrorist organizations and use terrorism as state policy.
On the issue of connectivity, member countries of the EAS expressed support for ASEAN’s efforts to implement the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity (MPAC) 2025, which aims to achieve a seamlessly connected and integrated ASEAN.
This in turn would “promote competitiveness, inclusiveness and a greater sense of community,” they said.
In so doing, the lead implementing body for the MPAC 2025 Strategic Area on Sustainable Infrastructure has been established. This will increase the understanding by governments, the private sector and communities of the importance of regional connectivity.
To promote trade and commerce, they noted the need for greater certainty and policies to sustain this momentum.
They also shared the resolve to keep markets open, inclusive and competitive through the rules-based multilateral trading system, as well as improving transparency and predictability in business.
Some leaders emphasized the importance of shared prosperity and being able to compete freely and fairly. They also noted the importance of efforts to improve the WTO, including its monitoring, rulemaking and dispute settlement functions.
Taiwan undoubtedly shares the interests of the East Asian countries on all these issues.
President Tsai Ing-Wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy has taken particular interest in strengthening ties with ASEAN. This can be gauged from the fact that ASEAN accounts for a big portion of Taiwanese exports and foreign direct investment.
Between January 2016 and April, ASEAN received more than 86 percent of Taiwan’s exports to countries covered by the policy and the meeting of the EAS has further increased the prospect of expanding ties.
Meanwhile, the absence of US President Donald Trump from the meeting did not go unnoticed.
His absence also intensified the efforts of countries to promote and strengthen cooperation to mention peace and security in this part of the word, when China is trying every possible thing to reshape the geostrategic situation in Asia in its favor so that it can play its hegemonic act without obstruction.
It has to be seen how the summit succeeds in its endeavor of maintaining a balance of power in the region.
Sumit Kumar is a Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University in Taipei and a research fellow at the Chennai Center for China Studies in India.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers