Among the 10 referendums that were held alongside the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections were five connected with LGBT issues. The three “pro-family” proposals gained considerably more votes than the two pro-LGBT ones.
The results mark a setback for equal marriage rights and gender-equality education, but in the words of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙): “The work of the revolution is not yet done. Let all our comrades strive on.”
Taiwanese still have much work to do.
The African-American civil rights movement came to the fore in the 1950s, but not until 1968 did it achieve the abolition of the US’ century-old racial segregation laws.
The women’s equality movement in the US started in the second half of the 19th century, but not until 1920 did the US Congress confirm women’s right to vote.
Even today, the specters of racial discrimination and male chauvinism linger. It is a history of shifting cultural paradigms.
The gender equality movement in Taiwan could be said to have started 18 years ago after the death of “rose boy” Yeh Yung-chih (葉永鋕) or 20 years ago when the Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association was founded.
In historical terms, Taiwan’s gender equality movement has only just begun.
That Taiwanese voters were able to express their opinions about marriage rights and gender-equality education via direct democracy in the form of referendums, and that LGBT-friendly proposals gained the support of more than 3 million voters — despite the two sides having very unequal resources — make this event a remarkable milestone.
As for the local government election results, they show that the issue of unification versus independence within the traditional pan-blue versus pan-green camp framework is cooling down as people start to prioritize policy issues related to the economy and livelihood.
The retreat of blue and green ideologies heralds the next round of civil issues.
A cultural war — if that is not too dramatic a term — is looming between suspicion and conservatism on the one hand, and human rights and progress on the other.
The social confrontation that has just taken place between supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage, and the big differences in the numbers of votes cast either way, show that there are huge gaps on this issue between generations, and between urban and rural.
With the population tending toward conservationism, gender-equality supporters need to break out of their comfort zone.
This can only be done by fighting rumors with facts through social education, so they must keep up their efforts to communicate and persuade.
The democracy movement also began in an atmosphere of ignorance. It had to dispel layer upon layer of suspicion and obstacles so that it could march step-by-step toward today’s impressive achievements.
Social workers often say that social work aims to eliminate itself. When it no longer exists, it will mean that society is nearing a state of harmony.
The work of advocating gender equality also aims to eliminate itself by achieving an ideal state of real gender equality.
Let us thank the 3 million people who supported the LGBT-friendly referendum proposals and the nearly 7 million who voted either way.
These things will long be remembered.
“Faith” and “perseverance” are not just words.
Love and tolerance are what make us great.
Teng Ming-hung is a lecturer at Yilan Community University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS