Fred Perrotta spent four years building a network of Chinese suppliers for his line of trendy backpacks, but as soon as the US announced tariffs on almost half of its Chinese imports, he started looking for suppliers in other countries.
That process is now so far advanced that it is too late to reverse it, even after US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) called a three-month truce in their trade war at this week’s G20 summit, the 33-year-old said.
Perrotta’s company, Tortuga, is joining what industry experts say is the biggest shift in cross-border supply chains since China joined the WTO in 2001.
Illustration: Yusha
The shift is creating stiff competition to secure new facilities in neighboring countries and rebuild supply chains outside of China, home to a fifth of global manufacturing.
“Everyone is nervous and scrambling around,” Perrotta said by telephone from Oakland, California, where he took delivery of the first samples from a potential new supplier in Vietnam.
“Long-term, we will probably shift everything,” he said.
The scramble is driven by the risk of more, and higher, US tariffs on China, and fears that nearby emerging economies can only accommodate new businesses on a “first come, first served” basis.
Vietnam and Thailand are emerging as preferred destinations, but they still face capacity constraints ranging from red tape to skilled labor and limited infrastructure.
Interviews with more than a dozen company executives, trade lawyers and lobby groups in various industries revealed a frenzy of activity across Asia in the past few months: Executives are requesting product samples, touring industrial parks, hiring lawyers and meeting with officials.
In June, Hong Kong-listed furniture maker Man Wah Holdings bought a factory in Vietnam for US$68 million and earlier this month said that it plans to almost triple its capacity to 373,000m2 by the end of next year.
“The acquisition is to mitigate the risks posed by tariffs,” Man Wah said in a statement.
Vietnam-based industrial real-estate developer BW Industrial said that inquiries have surged since October and all its factories are now leased out.
“The manufacturers are from all over the world, but they all have production plants in China and need to start production ASAP,” BW Industrial sales manager Chris Truong told reporters.
In Thailand, SVI PCL, which provides electronics and manufacturing solutions, said it has just selected four new deals worth about US$100 million with existing customers who have operations in China.
“The trade war is good for us,” chief executive officer Pongsak Lothongkam said. “We have been approached by so many companies that we have to prioritize.”
KCE Electronics, Southeast Asia’s biggest maker of printed circuit boards, has been contacted by US companies that want to seek a new supplier to replace one in China, chief executive officer Pitharn Ongkosit said.
“It’s a good opportunity. Many customers have contacted us to ask about our products and prices. But there are no sales yet, as it will take time,” he said.
Stars Microelectronics PCL, another Thai electronics manufacturing services provider, is also getting new business.
“Two [or] three companies will start moving their production base [out of China] to us soon,” chief executive officer Peerapol Wilaiwongstien said.
Cambodia is also attracting interest, with Parsippany, New Jersey-based bicycle maker Kent International Inc shifting Chinese production to the Southeast Asian country.
“We have a big business in the United States,” Arnold Kamler, the company’s majority owner and chief executive, told reporters. “There is no choice, but to as rapidly as possible look to move production away from China.”
The resourcing and relocation efforts mark an acceleration of an already established trend as China’s economy shifts toward services, consumption and high-tech production.
“We are on the cusp of the biggest sourcing disruption that we have seen in a generation,” said Stephen Lamar, executive vice president of the American Apparel & Footwear Association, whose more than 1,000 members contribute more than US$400 billion annually to US retail sales.
“The No. 1 thing I hear from companies is along the lines of: ‘For years we have been talking about diversifying from China and now we have to actually do it.’”
Shifting production can take years to complete: Firms need to secure funding, find the right suppliers, sort out new logistics — all while dealing with new legal and accounting issues in a country they might not know well.
“Any relocation away from China is going to be very slow and very uncertain,” said Aidan Yao, senior Asia emerging markets economist at AXA Investment Managers.
Low-tech goods and low-value manufacturing would be the quickest to migrate, while higher value-added exports in the machinery, transport and IT category would likely take decades to relocate due to high research and development costs, and competitive Chinese labor costs, UBS said in a note last month.
Yet a regional client poll by Citi conducted in October showed more than half of them already adjusting their supply chain to limit upheaval to their business.
China’s sophistication in areas, such as automation, means no one country can replace China, said trade lawyer Sally Peng of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg.
“So everyone is looking for that China plus one, plus two, plus three country strategy, all the way to Africa,” she said.
While Chinese export data show little sign yet of an impact from the trade war, some economists said that is because companies are rushing to get shipments out ahead of more tariffs.
To be sure, smaller emerging Asian economies are not necessarily licking their lips about the prospect of the trade war between the world’s top two economies worsening.
Growth has slowed in the third quarter across Southeast Asia, as well as in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, with officials partly blaming the trade war for it.
Thailand’s exports of electronic integrated circuits, for instance, in October rose 4 percent to the US, but fell 38 percent to China. Vietnam’s manufacturing sentiment indicator is the highest in Asia, but is well off its peak.
A lack of infrastructure is also a problem for countries seeking to pick up business.
Thailand is 41st in World Bank infrastructure quality rankings, Vietnam is 47th, compared with China’s 20th ranking.
Bangkok is seeking to address that with its Eastern Economic Corridor, an ambitious US$45 billion development project that plans improvements to deep water ports, airports and railways.
Beyond infrastructure bottlenecks, red tape — particularly in Vietnam — remains hard to navigate and skilled labor is not easily available.
Vietnam’s unemployment rate is 2.2 percent. Thailand’s is even lower.
“The proportion of unskilled labor in Vietnam remains large and there hasn’t been any effective plan to improve this issue, and I don’t see any significant change in five or even 10 years,” Vietnam Electronic Industries Association vice chairman Nguyen Phuoc Hai said.
“Whether cheap labor will remain one of Vietnam’s advantages in the face of the fourth industrial revolution is questionable.”
Additional reporting by Noah Sin, Marius Zaharia, Khan Vu, James Pearson and Rajesh Kumar Singh
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers