Fred Perrotta spent four years building a network of Chinese suppliers for his line of trendy backpacks, but as soon as the US announced tariffs on almost half of its Chinese imports, he started looking for suppliers in other countries.
That process is now so far advanced that it is too late to reverse it, even after US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) called a three-month truce in their trade war at this week’s G20 summit, the 33-year-old said.
Perrotta’s company, Tortuga, is joining what industry experts say is the biggest shift in cross-border supply chains since China joined the WTO in 2001.
Illustration: Yusha
The shift is creating stiff competition to secure new facilities in neighboring countries and rebuild supply chains outside of China, home to a fifth of global manufacturing.
“Everyone is nervous and scrambling around,” Perrotta said by telephone from Oakland, California, where he took delivery of the first samples from a potential new supplier in Vietnam.
“Long-term, we will probably shift everything,” he said.
The scramble is driven by the risk of more, and higher, US tariffs on China, and fears that nearby emerging economies can only accommodate new businesses on a “first come, first served” basis.
Vietnam and Thailand are emerging as preferred destinations, but they still face capacity constraints ranging from red tape to skilled labor and limited infrastructure.
Interviews with more than a dozen company executives, trade lawyers and lobby groups in various industries revealed a frenzy of activity across Asia in the past few months: Executives are requesting product samples, touring industrial parks, hiring lawyers and meeting with officials.
In June, Hong Kong-listed furniture maker Man Wah Holdings bought a factory in Vietnam for US$68 million and earlier this month said that it plans to almost triple its capacity to 373,000m2 by the end of next year.
“The acquisition is to mitigate the risks posed by tariffs,” Man Wah said in a statement.
Vietnam-based industrial real-estate developer BW Industrial said that inquiries have surged since October and all its factories are now leased out.
“The manufacturers are from all over the world, but they all have production plants in China and need to start production ASAP,” BW Industrial sales manager Chris Truong told reporters.
In Thailand, SVI PCL, which provides electronics and manufacturing solutions, said it has just selected four new deals worth about US$100 million with existing customers who have operations in China.
“The trade war is good for us,” chief executive officer Pongsak Lothongkam said. “We have been approached by so many companies that we have to prioritize.”
KCE Electronics, Southeast Asia’s biggest maker of printed circuit boards, has been contacted by US companies that want to seek a new supplier to replace one in China, chief executive officer Pitharn Ongkosit said.
“It’s a good opportunity. Many customers have contacted us to ask about our products and prices. But there are no sales yet, as it will take time,” he said.
Stars Microelectronics PCL, another Thai electronics manufacturing services provider, is also getting new business.
“Two [or] three companies will start moving their production base [out of China] to us soon,” chief executive officer Peerapol Wilaiwongstien said.
Cambodia is also attracting interest, with Parsippany, New Jersey-based bicycle maker Kent International Inc shifting Chinese production to the Southeast Asian country.
“We have a big business in the United States,” Arnold Kamler, the company’s majority owner and chief executive, told reporters. “There is no choice, but to as rapidly as possible look to move production away from China.”
The resourcing and relocation efforts mark an acceleration of an already established trend as China’s economy shifts toward services, consumption and high-tech production.
“We are on the cusp of the biggest sourcing disruption that we have seen in a generation,” said Stephen Lamar, executive vice president of the American Apparel & Footwear Association, whose more than 1,000 members contribute more than US$400 billion annually to US retail sales.
“The No. 1 thing I hear from companies is along the lines of: ‘For years we have been talking about diversifying from China and now we have to actually do it.’”
Shifting production can take years to complete: Firms need to secure funding, find the right suppliers, sort out new logistics — all while dealing with new legal and accounting issues in a country they might not know well.
“Any relocation away from China is going to be very slow and very uncertain,” said Aidan Yao, senior Asia emerging markets economist at AXA Investment Managers.
Low-tech goods and low-value manufacturing would be the quickest to migrate, while higher value-added exports in the machinery, transport and IT category would likely take decades to relocate due to high research and development costs, and competitive Chinese labor costs, UBS said in a note last month.
Yet a regional client poll by Citi conducted in October showed more than half of them already adjusting their supply chain to limit upheaval to their business.
China’s sophistication in areas, such as automation, means no one country can replace China, said trade lawyer Sally Peng of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg.
“So everyone is looking for that China plus one, plus two, plus three country strategy, all the way to Africa,” she said.
While Chinese export data show little sign yet of an impact from the trade war, some economists said that is because companies are rushing to get shipments out ahead of more tariffs.
To be sure, smaller emerging Asian economies are not necessarily licking their lips about the prospect of the trade war between the world’s top two economies worsening.
Growth has slowed in the third quarter across Southeast Asia, as well as in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, with officials partly blaming the trade war for it.
Thailand’s exports of electronic integrated circuits, for instance, in October rose 4 percent to the US, but fell 38 percent to China. Vietnam’s manufacturing sentiment indicator is the highest in Asia, but is well off its peak.
A lack of infrastructure is also a problem for countries seeking to pick up business.
Thailand is 41st in World Bank infrastructure quality rankings, Vietnam is 47th, compared with China’s 20th ranking.
Bangkok is seeking to address that with its Eastern Economic Corridor, an ambitious US$45 billion development project that plans improvements to deep water ports, airports and railways.
Beyond infrastructure bottlenecks, red tape — particularly in Vietnam — remains hard to navigate and skilled labor is not easily available.
Vietnam’s unemployment rate is 2.2 percent. Thailand’s is even lower.
“The proportion of unskilled labor in Vietnam remains large and there hasn’t been any effective plan to improve this issue, and I don’t see any significant change in five or even 10 years,” Vietnam Electronic Industries Association vice chairman Nguyen Phuoc Hai said.
“Whether cheap labor will remain one of Vietnam’s advantages in the face of the fourth industrial revolution is questionable.”
Additional reporting by Noah Sin, Marius Zaharia, Khan Vu, James Pearson and Rajesh Kumar Singh
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US