China is taking its rivalry with the US to the heavens, spending at least US$9 billion to build a celestial navigation system and cut its dependence on the US-operated GPS amid heightening tensions between the two countries.
Location data beamed from GPS satellites are used by smartphones, car navigation systems, the microchip in your dog’s neck and guided missiles — and all those satellites are controlled by the US Air Force. That makes the Chinese government uncomfortable, so it is developing an alternative that a US security analyst called one of the largest space programs the country has undertaken.
“They don’t want to depend on the US’ GPS,” said Marshall Kaplan, a professor in the aerospace engineering department at the University of Maryland. “The Chinese don’t want to be subject to something that we can shut off.”
The BeiDou Navigation Satellite System, currently serving China and its neighbors, is to be accessible worldwide by 2020 as part of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) strategy to make his country a global leader in next-generation technologies. Its implementation reverberates through the corporate world as makers of semiconductors, electric vehicles and airplanes modify products to also connect with Beidou to keep doing business in the world’s second-biggest economy.
Assembly of the new constellation is approaching critical mass after the launch of at least 18 satellites this year, including three this month. On Monday last week, China launched two more Beidou machines, increasing the number in operation to more than 40. Beijing plans to add 11 more by 2020.
Beidou is one element of China’s ambitious campaign to displace Western dominance in aerospace. A state-owned company is developing planes to replace those from Airbus and Boeing, and domestic startups are building rockets to challenge the commercial launch businesses of Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin.
Next month, China is scheduled to launch Chang’e 4, a lunar probe that would be the first spacecraft to the far side of the moon. A Mars probe and rover also are scheduled for liftoff in 2020.
“It is classic space race sort of stuff,” said Andrew Dempster, director of the Australian Centre for Space Engineering Research in Canberra.
China started developing Beidou in the 1990s and is to spend an estimated US$8.98 billion to US$10.6 billion on it by 2020, an analysis published last year by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission said.
The system is to provide positioning accuracies of 1m or less with use of a ground support system.
By comparison, GPS typically provides accuracies of less than 2.2m, which can be improved to a few centimeters with augmentation systems, the commission said.
“The Beidou system has become one of the great achievements in China’s 40 years of reform,” Xi said in a Nov. 5 letter to the UN International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems.
The system, named after the Big Dipper star pattern (beidou, 北斗), is at the core of an industry that could generate more than 400 billion yuan (US$57.58 billion) in revenue in 2020, the China Satellite Navigation Office forecast.
Beidou also has potential for export as part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the US-China security commission said.
NavInfo, a maker of electronic maps that is backed by Tencent Holdings, wants to begin mass-producing semiconductors for navigation systems using Beidou in 2020, project director Wang Yan said.
Beijing-based NavInfo, which supplies Tesla and BMW, said it expects annual demand of 15 million Beidou-linked chips for autonomous vehicles.
In September, NavInfo started providing Beidou-enabled mapping and positioning services for the Singaporean government.
“China needs to have its own satellite navigation system from a long-term, strategic perspective,” Wang said. “Beidou is the only option.”
That carries potential implications for the balance of power between the nations, as Beidou’s deployment likely will fuel creation of a supply network for China’s People’s Liberation Army.
“The PLA will additionally have its own domestic ‘industrial chain’ on which to draw for secure components,” the US-China commission said.
Qianxun Spatial Intelligence, a Shanghai-based venture between e-commerce titan Alibaba Group Holding and state-owned defense contractor China North Industries Group, provides positioning services for cars, public safety and civil aviation using Beidou and other networks.
To help stay competitive against budding Chinese counterparts, foreign companies are including Beidou compatibility in their products.
Qualcomm, the biggest maker of chips used in smartphones, has been supporting Beidou “for a long time,” the San Diego-based company said.
Those chip sets are also used in wearables and automobiles.
Most smartphones from global sales leader Samsung Electronics support Beidou in addition to GPS, the Suwon, South Korea-based company said, as do handsets from Chinese rivals Huawei Technologies and Xiaomi, according to state media.
Huawei is China’s top-selling brand.
China is also the largest auto market and the government wants all car navigation systems to be Beidou-compatible within two years.
Volkswagen — the market leader in passenger car sales — is changing the equipment in its vehicles to enable network access, the company said.
“At the moment, Volkswagen Group China does not sell cars with Beidou-enabled equipment, but the next infotainment system generation for cars in the Chinese market will be rolled out in 2020,” the Wolfsburg, Germany-based company said. “This system will be ready to receive Beidou information.”
Toyota Motor is in discussions with companies about Beidou, the Japanese automaker said.
In the sky, a regional jet developed by state-owned Commercial Aircraft Corp of China (COMAC) last year became the first plane to use Beidou.
Avionics-systems maker Rockwell Collins, a supplier to Airbus, Boeing and COMAC, does not offer products that can access the Chinese satellite network, the company said.
That might have to change, as the Chinese government eventually would require airlines flying in the country to add Beidou equipment, Kaplan said.
“They will have to have the Chinese system on board,” he said, citing the Chinese government’s security concerns. “The Chinese will require airlines to have both systems.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers