The Central Election Commission (CEC) has taken so much criticism over problems with Saturday’s elections and referendums that its chairman, Chen In-chin (陳英鈐), took the blame and resigned.
Many people said it took too long to vote, with some having to line up for more than two hours. Some people simply gave up and did not vote at all.
Many blamed the slow procedure on factors that fall within the remit of the CEC, such as the way the ballots were printed, the routes voters had to follow inside polling stations, the arrangement of ballot boxes and so on.
While there is room for improvement in all of these, we must not overlook five problems that affected the referendum polling on this occasion.
First, the procedure by which current referendum policies were drawn up was too haphazard. Amendments to the Referendum Act (公民投票法) were enacted on Dec. 12 last year without sufficient discussion.
By lowering the thresholds for initiating, seconding and passing referendums, these amendments led to an explosion in the number of referendums. To make matters worse, the schedule for processing referendums was dramatically shortened. In amending the act, legislators did not take into account the difficulties that might arise in implementing it, leading to the chaos seen when these policies were carried out.
Second, there are insufficient incentives for election officers. On this occasion, the great number of referendum proposals required more working time to process, without enough election officers to do it. This led to senior executives at local governments having to serve as election officers at polling stations. More election officers than before were forced into the role.
We need to discuss how to create better incentives to encourage people to serve as election officers.
Third, the time frame to prepare the election was significantly compressed. Local elections that do not include referendums are usually finalized at least four months in advance, allowing enough time to recruit election officers, and to plan and implement polling station layouts and procedures.
However, this time the nine-in-one elections were held alongside 10 referendums that were still not finalized one month before election day. The shortened preparation time caused confusion among election officials both nationally and locally, who came under immense pressure while implementing the policies.
Fourth, the referendum topics were badly presented. Apart from the large number of referendums, many voters also complained about their long-winded wording. Even highly literate people found the referendum texts difficult, never mind elderly people in rural areas who might have difficulty reading. We must think about how to make referendum questions simpler and clearer.
Fifth, there was not enough communication about the referendum topics. The greatly shortened schedules for the referendums did not allow for sufficient public communication and education, making them more like opinion polls.
Voters should be able to commit sufficient thought and discussion to referendum topics before they eventually make up their minds and vote. Furthermore, any policy decided upon will require complementary measures, so if policies are decided through referendums without adequate discussion, it might not be practical to carry them out.
Considering the slipshod way in which the policies for this set of referendums were drawn up, the people responsible for election affairs deserve a pat on the back for completing this “mission impossible.”
While the CEC does need to reflect on the way these elections and referendums were planned and carried out, and how it could be improved, we cannot overlook the slipshod way in which the referendum policies were drawn up and passed, without considering the problems that local governments might face in implementing them.
This will be an important topic not just for the CEC, but also for the legislature and Cabinet to deal with.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US