There have been reports that the Taiwan Telecommunication Industry Development Association has issued a letter to the Judicial Yuan, Control Yuan, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of National Defense and the Cabinet’s National Audit Office, saying that it would scrap the free-of-charge policy for providing communication records to judicial agencies, with fees to be implemented next year.
This runs counter to the trend of corporate governance that promotes corporate social responsibility.
When judges and prosecutors handle cases, they try to piece together information so that final verdicts are not made rashly based on insufficient evidence.
That being so, they sometimes have to request footage from public or private security cameras, and transaction details from financial institutions, as well as medical and communications records.
In particular, when investigating fraud or drugs cases, which has been the focus of a Cabinet crime-prevention project, they frequently need to check communications logs to clarify the movements and interpersonal networks of members of organized crime rings.
Public and private institutions have taken corporate social responsibility into consideration when providing communications records without charge.
District prosecutors’ offices have also followed the principle that the judiciary is for the people and never profited by pursuing of fees when working on criminal cases.
In other words, by placing social responsibility over personal gain, agencies have worked together, sharing resources to create a selfless judicial system.
If telecommunications companies begin to charge government agencies for communications records, then financial and medical institutions, convenience stores and land administration offices might follow suit. If that happens, judicial organs would have two options: Increase budgeting or make fewer such requests.
Even if they were to increase budgeting, if the funds for such services were spent by October, would that mean they would not be able to request communications logs for the rest of the year? If footage from a security camera were erased while an agency waited on funds, who should be responsible for the absence of evidence from a trial?
It is clear that competition in the telecommunications sector is high, but judicial interests are part of corporate social responsibility. It would not be wise to “kill the hen to get the eggs,” sacrificing judicial integrity for a tiny profit.
Who knows, the telecom association’s letter might mean that the response to a prosecutor’s request for communications records would be: “Please first pay the NT$1,000 fee at the cashier’s desk.”
In a free market, nobody should criticize a business for seeking a profit, but a business that also pursues sustainable management has the long-term vision of true entrepreneurship.
Chuang Chia-wei is a Changhua district prosecutor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers