In a community hall, a group of men sit cross-legged on mats, poring over documents and maps marked with forests, farmland, a river and the village of Gajah Bertalut in Indonesia’s Sumatra island.
They are gathered to work on their claim to legal rights and a collective title to 4,414 hectares of land on which they have lived and farmed for years.
“This is proof that you have lived here and used the forest land, and that you have customary rights over it as indigenous people,” said Rakhmat Hidayat of research organization World Resources Institute (WRI), holding a sheaf of papers.
“Once you get the title, you will have more control over the land and you need not worry about the land being taken for mining or palm oil plantations against your wishes,” he said.
Gajah Bertalut in Riau Province is among the first villages to have its land mapped by WRI as part of the government’s drive to clarify land holdings using satellite technology and local records, with the help of community leaders and researchers.
Indonesia aims to register all land holdings under its One Map initiative by 2025.
Following a landmark 2013 ruling by the Indonesian Constitutional Court to remove customary forests, or hutan adat, from state control and restore them to indigenous communities, Indonesian President Joko Widodo has vowed to return 12.7 million hectares of land.
As of last year, titles to 1.9 million hectares of forest land have been given, benefiting about 500,000 households, the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry said.
However, progress has been slow because of conflicting claims, a paucity of records and a multiplicity of maps, said WRI, which compiles competing claims on a single map and attempts to resolve conflicts by bringing everyone together for talks.
“We have lived here a long time, and we have used the forest and cultivated the land with our traditional knowledge,” said Darman, who goes by one name, a resident of Gajah Bertalut.
“All around us, we have seen forest land taken for mining and for palm oil plantations that are not good for the environment or for the people. When our rights are recognized, we will preserve the forest and plan for the future,” he said.
Indigenous and local communities own more than half the world’s land under customary rights, yet they only have secure legal rights to 10 percent, advocacy group Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) said.
Governments maintain control over more than two-thirds of global forest area, much of which is claimed by local communities, RRI said in a report.
In Indonesia, indigenous people are estimated to have ownership rights over 40 million hectares of customary forest and other land.
The concept of adat, or custom, has been in place since the Dutch colonial era in the nation, and refers to the rules that determined who used land and resources, and how.
When the federal government took charge, it declared much of the forest land as state forest area and decided who could use it. This undermined customary adat rights and dispossessed many communities of their land, activists say.
Decentralization in 1999 led to the granting of land concessions to investors tapping the palm oil boom, further weakening indigenous rights and their claims over land.
The 2013 ruling has “dramatically strengthened” indigenous peoples’ tenure rights, said Rukka Sombolinggi of the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), but claims can only be recognized at the federal ministry level and not by local officials.
This has led to an expensive and time consuming process, made more challenging by the requirement of clear titles, she said.
“The government’s insistence on ‘clean and clear’ titles places an unfair burden on indigenous people, many of whom have never had formal titles,” she said.
AMAN, which is also a part of the One Map program, has submitted maps of indigenous land of about 9.65 million hectares to the government to be recognized, she said.
In addition, passing a long delayed law on indigenous people would speed up the return of land, she said.
The draft law recognizes their customary and collective rights over land, as well as their right to self governance.
Indonesia is one of only a few Asian nations, including India and the Philippines, with legal frameworks recognizing communities as forest owners, but the process is beset by delays and attempts to dilute the laws, activists say.
Villagers also need support to manage their resources better and diversify land use.
In Gajah Bertalut village, where families have tapped rubber trees and cultivated forest land for generations, WRI is teaching residents organic farming to supplement their income from fishing and to conserve the soil better.
A group of young men and women is growing chilli, spinach and vegetables on common land with training from WRI, said Elin Purnamasari, 24.
“It’s only a small plot now, but when we get the community rights, perhaps more people can join and we can cultivate on more land,” she said. “This can be our future.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past