With only days to go before the nation votes on a referendum that seeks to change the national team’s name from “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) sent a letter warning about the consequences of such a plebiscite.
The letter, dated on Friday, was the third of its kind sent by the IOC to the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee (CTOC) over the past six months to voice disapproval of the call for a “name rectification.”
However, it was the first time that the IOC explicitly said that any change to the team’s name could result in disqualification under Rule 27.9 of the Olympic Charter.
The letter’s obvious timing aside, the blatant attempt by the IOC to interfere with Saturday’s referendum — despite its claim that it has no intention to “interfere with local procedures” — as well as its readiness to curry favor with Beijing, proves that it does not have the leadership capabilities expected of an organization that oversees international sports events
Its attempt to interfere with Taiwan’s domestic affairs should be condemned by all democratic nations.
The IOC said that “any attempts to exercise undue pressure on the CTOC to breach the 1981 agreement and/or act against the decisions of the IOC Executive Board” could result in the disqualification of the national team, citing an agreement signed by the two bodies in 1981 in Lausanne, Switzerland.
Meanwhile, the CTOC has been playing second fiddle, urging voters to vote “no” in the referendum to avoid affecting participation in the 2020 Olympics.
It is frightening how the two committees each seem to have the ability to foretell the future and see the result of the referendum, as is their assumption that the government would suddenly forget how to make civilized decisions and pressure the CTOC into filing an application for the name change.
The glaring silliness in their words sound eerily like Beijing talking.
They might soon discover that their well-meaning worries are not only unsolicited, but also unnecessary, as it is none of their concern how Taiwanese would vote or how the government would act on the result of the referendum, if it is passed, not to mention that there are many possible ways in which the latter could be carried out.
They also seem to have forgotten that public discontent over national teams using the “Chinese Taipei” monicker was the reason for the referendum proposal.
At this point, it is anyone’s guess whether Taiwanese athletes would arrive at some kind of agreement to participate in the Games individually if passage of the referendum did lead to Taiwan’s team being disqualified, or what kind of publicity campaign the government would run to lobby for international support for the name change.
If the referendum’s outcome shows that the public demands change, open discussions need to take place to allow that outcome to run its course. The future is unwritten and it most certainly should not be decided by outsiders.
With Taiwan often hailed by observers as Asia’s most vibrant democracy, its elections have time and again drawn the attention of foreign media, academics and others.
With a record-high of 10 referendums to be held alongside the nine-in-one elections on Saturday, the world is waiting to see what choices Taiwanese will make.
That is why voters must vote for what they believe in and not succumb to external influence, for if they are too afraid to speak up for themselves, no one else will.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past