US Vice President Mike Pence traded sharp barbs with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in back-to-back speeches at the APEC summit, showing that neither nation appears to be giving ground in an escalating trade dispute.
Xi on Saturday received applause when he told the summit in Papua New Guinea that implementing tariffs and breaking up supply chains was “short-sighted” and “doomed to failure.”
He called for a stronger WTO and defended his signature Belt and Road Initiative, saying it is “not a trap as some people have labeled it.”
Speaking moments later, Pence told delegates the US offers nations in the region “a better option’’ for economic and diplomatic relations than Beijing’s heavy-handed approach.
He warned against taking Chinese loans, saying the US “doesn’t drown our partners in a sea of debt” nor offer “a constricting belt or a one-way road.”
The back-and-forth on a cruise ship docked in Port Moresby, the capital, suggested the world’s biggest economies remained far from a deal to end a damaging trade spat, even after US President Donald Trump said he was optimistic about a resolution.
Trump and Xi are scheduled to meet in a few weeks at a G20 summit in Buenos Aires.
Trump on Friday last week told reporters that the Chinese response to US’ trade demands was largely complete, but was missing four or five big issues. Those comments helped US stocks erase losses, as investors bet on whether Trump would impose even more tariffs on Chinese goods than the US$250 billion already in place.
China has slapped tariffs on US$110 billion of imports from the US in retaliation.
On Saturday, Pence warned that Trump could still put more tariffs on China.
“We hope for better, but the United States will not change course until China changes its ways,” Pence said.
Later, Pence told reporters he was “very hopeful” the US and China could reach a deal, but “things have to change” for that to happen.
“We’re in a very strong position,’’ Pence said when asked whether there was a deadline to end the trade dispute. “The American people know that we have to do something to reset this relationship with China economically. So, I don’t think there’s a timetable.”
Xi gave no indication of giving in on some key US demands, including an end to technology transfers, support for state-run enterprises and giving up on its “Made in China 2025” plan to lead the world in key industries.
He said intellectual property rights are important to protect innovation, but they should not widen the digital gap between nations.
Xi also made a veiled reference to a new grouping known as “the Quad” that aims to counter China’s influence in the Asia-Pacific region. Consisting of the US, Japan, India and Australia, the group met in Singapore for the third time this week to discuss ways to cooperate.
“Attempts to form exclusive blocs or impose one’s will on others should be rejected,” Xi said. “History has shown that confrontation, whether in the form of a cold war, a hot war or a trade war, will produce no winners.”
China’s growing military prowess and debt-fueled economic aid to smaller nations has increased concerns that it could seek a base for its armed forces in the Pacific or Indian oceans.
The nation’s growing influence in Papua New Guinea was on display in Port Moresby: dozens of red Chinese flags line a new six-lane highway built by China, while a giant billboard shows Xi shaking hands with Papua New Guinean Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.
Pence on Saturday said the US would partner with Papua New Guinea and Australia in redeveloping the Lombrum Naval Base on Manus Island.
Still, while US allies such as Australia welcome its firepower in the region, they also worry about its tactics on trade.
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison used his speech at APEC to strongly criticize the US-China trade dispute, while inviting other nations to participate in a revamped Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
“Tit-for-tat protectionism and threats of trade wars are in no one’s interests economically, and undermine the authority of the global and regional trading rules that benefit us all,” Morrison said.
Trump’s withdrawal from the TPP last year and his push for bilateral trade deals are causing concern among allies, said Ashley Townshend, director of the foreign policy and defense program at the US Studies Centre at the University of Sydney.
“By withdrawing from multilateral trade agreements and pursuing unilateral tit-for-tat tariffs that are damaging not just for the US and China, but for the broader regional and global trading system, the Trump administration is putting itself at odds with America’s Asian allies and partners,” he said. “That’s the concern.”
Pence is representing Trump at the summits after the president opted not to attend — becoming the first US head of state to skip the marquee Asian conferences since 2013.
Pence sought to reassure nations that are concerned that the US-China dispute “will hurt the region economically.’’
He said the US was working to improve relations with Beijing and pointed to Trump’s upcoming meeting with Xi as an opportunity for progress.
“We believe that progress could be made between our two nations, even as the United States remains in a strong position,” Pence said.
Meanwhile, Xi said talks would only work if both sides treated each other with respect.
“If countries can only treat each other equally and understand each other, there will be no issues that can’t be settled by negotiation,” Xi said.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS