As campaigning for Saturday’s nine-in-one elections heats up, the “Han phenomenon” surrounding Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has not just been making a lot of noise on the Internet. Some China-friendly news channels have degenerated into a “Han Kuo-yu fan club,” broadcasting positive reports about him all day, every day.
This monotonous and one-sided programming tramples on the principle of fairness in reporting, which news channels are required to follow by law. Some news media have even gone so far as to manufacture fake news, such as a rumor that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩) begged people at an election rally in Kaohsiung for her party’s mayoral candidate, DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), not to leave.
Chiu actually thanked attendees for not leaving even though it was quite late.
Such rumor-mongering clearly contravenes the legal requirement to verify facts before reporting a story.
The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission on Wednesday last week published its annual report to the US Congress.
It said that Beijing has been using disinformation and other methods in an effort to interfere in Taiwan’s elections.
In an interview with TVBS that was broadcast on Nov. 9, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman James Moriarty said that “external powers” were trying to alter the debate in Taiwan and spread false information to change the outcome of the elections, which he said is dangerous.
The government, and especially the National Communications Commission (NCC), which is responsible for matters to do with broadcasting, must seriously consider the warnings emanating from the US and be more decisive in enforcing the law.
Article 27 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法) says: “The content of the program and advertisement produced and broadcasted by a satellite broadcasting business and the branch office or agent of a foreign satellite broadcasting business shall respect cultural diversity, protect human dignity and fulfill social responsibility. The produced and broadcast news and comments shall pay attention to fact verification and principles of fairness.”
Paragraph 4 of the article says that satellite TV and radio news broadcasts must not violate the principle of fact verification or harm the public interest.
Article 48 and other articles in the penal provisions chapter of the act say that satellite broadcasting companies that contravene these regulations face fines of NT$200,000 to NT$2 million (US$6,471 to US$64,712) and are required to suspend transmission of the offending program or advertisement, or take corrective measures.
Given these clearly stipulated regulations and the warnings raised in the US congressional report and by the AIT, the NCC should stop condoning the biased reporting of the “Han Kuo-yu fan club” news stations. It should also stop turning a blind eye to fake news.
Before Saturday’s elections, the NCC must implement measures to hold offenders responsible and take corrective action. Only by so doing can it perform its duty of safeguarding the nation’s hard-won democracy and the rule of law.
Huang Di-ying is a lawyer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past